Customer Reviews

Our Living Multiverse: A Book of Genesis in 0+7 Chapters

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

It appears "Our Living Multiverse" is a reissue of "Origins of Existence". So far, I've been unable to locate where this is mentioned by the publisher. It's a shame such a great book was reissued under a new name without clearly so stating in its description.

While this is a good book, it is little more than a re-issue of the author's previous book "The Origins of Existence" (which I enjoyed). I find it disturbing and frankly insulting that the author and publisher do not make this fact more transparent to consumers. Why should readers have to pay twice for the same material? Also, I get a bit turned off by science books that attempt to make parallels (even superficially) with religious scripture, as they (sometimes unintentionally) perpetuate the false notion that science and religion are compatible. At any rate, I would recommend this book or the author's previous book for up-to-date views of contemporary cosmology and "the big picture". But readers beware: they are one and the same!

I like this book. It is enlightening and contains a multitude of information put together in a well defined format.
However...
I found the book quite difficult to read, both because of its use of the language and by the convoluted way the author went about explaining concepts. To give an example, I have studied thermodynamics and have come across dozens of descriptions of entropy but this one seemed the hardest to get through.
Some places you get fed the simplest information. And I understand why, since the author cannot assume every reader have the proper background.
But: You read two paragraphs describing analog vs. digital information, and then you get a sentence like this: "In one theory, the high-energy space-time of the background is subject to quantum fluctuations that cause small portions of the space-time to attain high potential energies for the inflation field."
I don't know if it's just me, but I'll bet you'd be hard pressed to find many people who lack the knowledge of the former concepts but can understand the latter (sentence).
So again, it is a good book, not well written. I'd say read it, but it's not ecstasy.