- Explore more great deals on thousands of titles in our Deals in Books store.
|Amazon Price||New from||Used from|
Q: Why did you write this book?
A: I am exceptionally proud of the leadership that President Obama and his senior advisers showed in insisting that we do the right thing, as opposed to the expedient thing, and felt that that story deserved to be told.
Q: Most Washington memoirs tend to be either dry policy books or centered on the author’s recollections. How does yours differ?
A: I did not want to write either an unreadable quasi-academic tome or a book about me! So I decided to use my background as a journalist to "report out" the story, extending it to include events before and after my time at the Treasury. I interviewed more than 150 people, covering a period that began with the decision by the Bush administration to provide GM and Chrysler with bridge financing and ended with GM’s filing of its initial public offering and its naming of Dan Akerson as CEO. And I also tried to use my journalistic training to write the book in a lively, engaging manner.
Q: Are there any particular ways that you tried to make the book readable?
A: I tried to bring to life the many interesting characters who were part of this extraordinary restructuring. I came away from my time in Washington with enormous respect for President Obama, Rahm Emanuel, Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, and many others, and I thought readers would be interested in human portraits of these exceptional people. I also got to know the CEOs and other key players in the auto industry and worked hard to also bring them to life for readers.
Q: Most Americans these days have a low opinion of Washington and what goes on there. As a newcomer to government, how did you find your experience?
A: It was eye-opening. On the one hand, because of President Obama’s leadership and because of the existence of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (better known as "TARP"), we were able to successfully restructure these companies using the bankruptcy process and $82 billion of TARP money. But I also learned that the success of the auto effort was quite unusual by Washington standards because almost any other initiative would require congressional approval, and Congress is every bit as dysfunctional as polls suggest Americans believe that it is. If we had had to secure congressional approval of the auto bailout, I have no doubt that at least one or both of the automakers would have ended up running out of money, going into an uncontrolled bankruptcy, and liquidating, possibly putting a million more Americans out of work and causing a depression in the Midwest.
Q: Some commentators say that the government should not be making these kinds of interventions. They argue that the market should be allowed to work.
A: I agree that wherever possible, the market should be allowed to work. But in this case, we had no alternative. GM and Chrysler were running out of money, financial markets were frozen and there was no possibility of them raising additional funds, either in or outside of bankruptcy. So without government help, the entire auto sector would have collapsed, with disastrous economic consequences.
Q: What was it like to work in Washington on a day-to-day basis?
A: It’s certainly different from my previous positions in the private sector. In writing the book, I tried to paint a picture of what working in the world’s largest and most powerful bureaucracy is really like, with revealing, sometimes humorous anecdotes. For example, I ended up paying for beverages and lunch every time we had visitors; the Treasury had no budget for such things. Even getting visitors cleared for entry into the Treasury building could be challenging—one guest who had flown in from Detroit ended up having to speak to us from a nearby Starbucks. On the other hand, when you call and say you are from the U.S. Treasury, you get a very different response from when you call from a private investment firm!
Q: What is your outlook for the auto companies?
A: It’s too early to say for sure, but the preliminary indications suggest that both GM and Chrysler are on a path to sustained viability. GM has now reported two quarters of significant net income, and with luck it will complete its initial public offering in November. Chrysler still needs to successfully fill out its product line, but its financial results to date are also well ahead of our expectations. The new management teams at GM and Chrysler have already made a huge difference—management matters!
excellent acocunt, but missing the financial summary at the end of the book - so how much did the taxpayer pay and what did they get back??Published 6 months ago by kkc
He's honest and thorough. He establishes without doubt that Team Auto was entirely in charge of both bailouts. Read morePublished 8 months ago by steven r. jakubowski
The book gives an interesting history of the need to reorganize GM. This is great, except GM shouldn't have been reorganized. Read morePublished 14 months ago by Erica Ford
As a native Detroiter, am interested in the auto industry as well as the devolution of this great city. Read morePublished 16 months ago by Marilyn Carlson-Swafford
Steven Rattner is a smart guy. Easy and entertaining read, I learned and gained an understanding that eluded me in this mixed up world.Published 16 months ago by teatime
This book is a case study in extremes; extremely good and extremely annoying. On one hand it provides a fascinating look at the work done to salvage the automotive industry from... Read morePublished 18 months ago by Michael
steven rattner gave a self serving accounting of himself during the crisis. At times it was entertaining and informative. He carried the water for the Obama administration.Published 21 months ago by turk