REf Dictionaries Atlas Language Guides Writing Guides Learn more
The Oxford Dictionary of Islam and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy Used
$19.95
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Good | Details
Sold by booksbykate
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Unmarked inside, tight binding. Dust jacket has some wear and tear. Qualifies for Prime Shipping and FREE standard shipping for orders over $35. Overnight and 2 day shipping available! Ships direct from Amazon!
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Oxford Dictionary of Islam Hardcover – May 15, 2003

ISBN-13: 978-0195125580 ISBN-10: 0195125584

Used
Price: $19.95
12 New from $27.71 25 Used from $0.34 1 Collectible from $40.83
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$27.71 $0.34
Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Holiday Deals in Books
Holiday Deals in Books
Find deals for every reader in the Holiday Deals in Books store, featuring savings of up to 50% on cookbooks, children's books, literature & fiction, and more.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press (May 15, 2003)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0195125584
  • ISBN-13: 978-0195125580
  • Product Dimensions: 9.6 x 1.2 x 6.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,611,560 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Booklist

In this volume "designed for general readers with little or no knowledge of Islam," more than 2,000 alphabetically arranged entries treat "the religion of Islam and its impact on history, politics, and society." Editor Esposito also edited the four-volume Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World (1995), from which the new work extracts and updates material. Recent developments are reflected in the entries Bin Laden, Osama; HAMAS; Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO); Qaeda, al-; and Taliban. There are also entries that describe Islam in various countries and regions, while the religious foundation of Islam is treated in the entries Pillars of Islam and Quran. The Islamic perspective on topics such as abortion and homosexuality is also provided. Although the focus is on the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the inclusion of important persons and places in the history of Islam broadens the scope of the work.

The goal of creating a compact resource for the general reader may account for the lack of features such as supplemental bibliographies and an index. Cross-referencing isi nsufficient. The entry for Pillars of Islam has no see reference from "Five Pillars," a name by which they are also commonly known. Further, this entry fails to point the reader to the entries for each of the individual pillars, something an index and see also references could easily accomplish.

The standard reference tool for Islam is the ongoing Encyclopaedia of Islam (Brill, 1954-). Densely academic, it is beyond the scope of many libraries and contains little in the way of contemporary issues. Another option is the single-volume The New Encyclopedia of Islam (AltaMira, 2001), which includes suggestions for further reading, illustrations, and better cross-references, though it, too, lacks an index and bibliographies for entries.

World events have sparked a keen interest in Islam. Despite its drawbacks, The Oxford Dictionary of Islam would be a useful addition to public and academic libraries. RBB
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

Review


"News coverage of the Arab world has expanded and improved in the last two years.... The Oxford Dictionary of Islam may be your best bet short of reading a pile of books, or living next door to a professor of Islamic studies. John L. Esposito, professor of religion and international affairs at Georgetown University, has assembled an impressive team of contributors who have produced a concise, accessible reference volume. With more than 2,000 entries, it covers almost anything you might want to look up, and some crucially important things you might not think to."--The New York Times, Education Life



More About the Author


John L. Esposito is University Professor of Religion and International Affairs at Georgetown University and Founding Director of the Prince Alwaleed Bin-Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding. He is the editor of The Oxford Encyclopedia of Modern Islam and The Oxford History of Islam, and author of Unholy War, What Everyone Needs to Know about Islam, and many other acclaimed works.

Customer Reviews

3.4 out of 5 stars

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

16 of 17 people found the following review helpful By Paul Stevenson VINE VOICE on November 16, 2008
Format: Paperback
I bought this dictionary hoping that it would be a useful reference for a graduate course dealing with the relationship between Christianity and Islam during the early years of Islam. I have found it to be spotty and inconsistent.

For example, I wanted to know the dates of the Abbasid dynasty. I tried looking up "Abbasid." There is no such entry. I tried looking at the timeline at the end of the dictionary. There, the first reference to Abbasids is in the entry for 744-750 (p. 352): "Third Muslim civil war and defeat of Umayyads by Abbasids." There is no statement that this marks the beginning of the Abbasid Dynasty. However, the entry for the year 661 (p. 351) does include the information that "Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan founds Umayyad Dynasty." Why is there no comparable statement about the founding of the Abbasid Dynasty?

I decided to see if the dictionary had an entry for the Umayyads. Yes, it does (p. 326). This makes all the harder to understand why there is no entry for the Abbasids.

Returning to the timeline, the second entry that mentions the Abbasids (750-850) mentions three caliphs of this dynasty: al-Mahdi, Harun al-Rashid and al-Mamun. Does the body of the dictionary have entries for each of these men? No, yes (alphabetized under "Harun"), yes (alphabetized under "Mamun"). I tried looking for al-Mahdi under "al-" and "Mahdi." There are a few entries beginning with "al-," but not nearly as many as would be required were all of them listed consistently. I looked under "Mahdi." There I found an entry for Mahdi as an honorific applied to Muhammad and the first four caliphs; one for Abd al-Rahman al-Mahdi (d. 1959); one for Sadiq al-Mahdi (b.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By B. Marold HALL OF FAMETOP 100 REVIEWER on April 2, 2012
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
There is a sense in which I agree with the reviewer who said that Wikipedia is both more complete and cheaper (it's free). Esposito is a world class expert on Islam and Oxford dictionaries are generally a good authority on their subject. And, the list of contributors is daunting. They seem to have corraled every Anglo-American expert on the subject to contribute articles. The entries are written in a non-technical way, and there is no Arabic to feel you are missing something. I would literally suggest that if you really wanted to find out something about Islam, just start reading this dictionary from front to back (all the really good stuff starts with "A" anyway, in Arabic.)

That's the good part. The drawbacks begin with the comparison with Wikipedia. No self-respecting college scholar or teacher will accept citations from Wikipedia because we have no idea who wrote them, and no guarantee of its authenticity. The day Wikipedia is accepted as a scholarly source is the day books like this will stop selling. But look, in spite of all the contributors, the contributors' names are not given at the end of the entries. I am also disappointed that when one entry refers to another, there is no active link to take you there. The weakest aspect of the dictionary is that there is no bibliography in the entries. I also tend to take issue with some articles, where there are conflicting opinions, the articles cite one and make no mention of the other, such as with the nature of Satan / Iblis.

If it were not for the air of authenticity supplied by Oxford and Esposito, I would not have gotten this. As it is, I can safely refer to this in papers, which I cannot do with Wikipedia...yet.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Comprehensive coverage of Muslim culture. I'm a beginner in Islamic subjects. There is no such a book in my native idiom (Portuguese).
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Very disappointing! Unlike the O.D. of Christianity and Judism the articles were short and lacked elaboration. I expected an explaination as to the various Moslem Sects, what I got a brief note as to what or whom they were followers of. The cross-references were even more lacking. It was wanting as to the structures of each sect or division. All in all a great disappointment.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
By T. Watson on January 1, 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I love this dictionary. I turn to this book when I am in need of a defination as I am a recent convert to Islam and discovering and learning about Islam on my own. When I am reading an article or book and run across a word or saying that I am not familiar with I turn to this dictionary. Very helpful. A must have!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?