Customer Reviews

The Oxford History of the Roman World (Boardman)

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

The Oxford History of the Roman World is, first and foremost, an excellent edition and a perfect primer for the lay-historian and undergraduate. I am not denying that fact (though in this case I wish it was possible to give this book 4 1/2 stars, but nevertheless...); what I will do now, however, is go into a bit more detail about the positives and negatives of this broad history.

Being The Oxford HISTORY of the Roman World, one logically starts with the pure historiography. It is very good indeed, but, unlike the Oxford History of Greece (a superior volume), the pure history stops about mid-way through the book and is replaced with more specific chapters dealing with literature, philosophy, religion, art and architecture. All of these are fascinating, in particular literature and philosophy, but the history of the later Imperial times becomes somewhat muddled due to no chapter dedicated solely to the background of the period. This is disappointing, even more so because it certainly could have been done: the final chapter, Envoi: Taking Leave of Antiquity, is an excellent chapter on, among other things, the (very) general history of the fifth century Roman Empire (up to its collapse in 476 AD by the Goths), and the Cambridge authority who wrote it, I feel, could have easily written a larger chapter on solely the history of the Imperial period to be slotted into it's appropriate place. Unfortunately that is not the case and the volume, in this regard, is left feeling naggingly incomplete.

The chapters on philosophy and literature, as I have said, are excellent (philosophy, I feel, more interesting.) Like the Greek history had its chapter dedicated to Homer, so does the Roman history have a chapter dedicated to Virgil - both are fascinating. The philosophy component is excellent, but I felt it was underrepresented in this volume. It had a large presence in the Greek edition and I found it enthralling reading.

The chapters on art and architecture were interesting indeed, but there were too many and they were too lengthy. Art and architecture for the casual historian is important but perhaps too specialised a field to have such a large presence in the general history of a period. They would do better to be either cut down in length and number or saved for another, more comprehensive, volume. As they stand they are interesting; but it leaves me wondering what they left out to include these (perhaps my missing history of later Imperial Rome!)

Overall, this is an excellent volume and a great primer for those wishing to understand ancient Rome from it's foundations to the collapse of the Western Empire. For all its faults I couldn't bear to give it four stars - four and a half would have been perfect but, alas, that cannot be done. So I give it five.

As always, the bibliography and further reading sections are excellent, as are the maps and the overall quality of the book's construction.

Enjoy (and I won't hold it against you if you skip the Art and Architecture essays!). You won't regret it.

This book might perhaps be good for those who whish to learn about Roman literature. It contain almost no information on poltics or economics. The corresponding Oxford book on Greek history is generally speaking a much better book than this one.

I purchased this after finishing the excellent Oxford History of Greece and the Hellenistic World, and while I found this book useful it was a bit of a let down after in comparison with its counterpart.

I appreciate the broad range of both, devoting significant space to social and cultural topics. However, the structure of the Greek history was much better in the way it divided the history of Greece by era and addressed each more or less in a parallel manner, beginning with a basic political history that was both useful in and of itself and grounded the following sections on religion, literature etc.

In contrast, this book has far less straight history and what exists is all front-loaded, essentially unmooring some of the later chapters from any historical contrast. Additionally, entire eras of political history are left unaddressed or are merely alluded to, which can be confusing for a neophyte like myself. Finally, there are some sections (particularly the first) where the style can be a little opaque.

As I said, this was still an interesting book, but in my opinion it's not an ideal primer on the subject and falls short of the standard set by the companion edition on Greece.

Disapointing. Too little history and too much culture. Writing also not up to ususal Brit quality