| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
53 of 59 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Edifices: deliberate, fantasmagorical, neural,
This review is from: In the Palaces of Memory: How We Build the Worlds Inside Our Heads (Paperback)
"Whenever you read a book or have a conversation, the experience causes physical changes in your brain. In a matter of seconds, new circuits are formed, memories that can change forever the way you think about the world. [...] I'll never forgive David Lynch for his movie Erasorhead." The first two pages of In the Palaces of Memory introduce remembrance as an act not only of acquisition but of self-exposure. Memories make it possible for us to function; they may also lodge themselves in us "like a shard of glass healed inside a wound," never to be expelled. Some memories are desired and some become a part of the structure of our minds against our will.Memory's palaces, though, may be as much the edifices the theorists construct as they are the ones inside our heads. This slim volume is not only an analysis of the way memory works but also an exposé of the way memory morphs depending on who's studying it. The underlying question, as in so much of Johnson's work, is really "how a theory matches up with some kind of real world," and what the world (in this case the brain) looks like from the point of view of the brain-children, scientific or philosophical, that purport to explain it. In this book the "unruly, creative art of theory-building" occupies center stage with memory. What is remarkable about Johnson's writing is the uninhibited intimacy he seems to have with his subjects and with us, his readers, so that we can feel ourselves to be as close to the Thing, whatever it is, as he is. Johnson has granted me the delightful illusion of being nose to nose with a neuron, with Gell-Mann, with Planck's constant -- almost as though the experience were unmediated by an author. The man's a master story teller. But what comes across is also -- and here's the clincher -- a profound sense of amusement. If I'm not mistaken George Johnson is given to quiet chuckles in the dark over theoreticians and theorems. He infuses his translations of science in the making with a persistent, ironic-affectionate grin. How can we resist.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Superb popular intro to neuroscience circa 1990,
By Michael J Edelman (Huntington Woods, MI USA) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER) (VINE VOICE) (REAL NAME)
This review is from: In the Palaces of Memory: How We Build the Worlds Inside Our Heads (Paperback)
George Johnson is not only a superb writer, he's one of those rare writers of popular science books who actually seems to have a very good understanding of what he's writing about. In this case it's the basics of what was, at the time of the writing of this book, the emerging new multidisciplinary Neurosciences. During the 1980s psychologists, neurobiologists, computer scientists, philosophers and even engineers started talking together and even working together on models of the complete spectrum of neuroscience, ranging from models of individual neurons and neural networks to models of cognitive functions and human performance. This was an exciting time to be in the neuroscience, with new and often competing models emerging, it seemed, every month. Johnson begins with the question of how learning occurs at the lowest levels- that is, what is the biology and the chemistry that enables permanent changes to be made in how and when an individual cell alters its response to stimuli? By means of illustration- and to introduce a bit of drama to the story- Johnson plays the competing theories of two groups, those who believed changes occurred prior to the synapse (i.e., in the cell sending the signal) and those who believed changes occurred after the synapse- and personifies these two groups in the competing theories of Eric Kandell, a major figure to this day, and Gary Lynch, then a young and up-and-coming challenger. This first part of the book is outstanding in the clarity of its presentation of material. Form there Johnson takes us into the worlds of simulation and neural networks, which involves a trip back to the 1950s, when a small group of engineers at MIT and a few other schools began looking into ho neural functions could be instantiated in hardware. McCullogh and Pitts realized that it was possible to describe a calculus of neurons and neural function in humans and other animals, and some researchers even built artificial neurons and neural networks out of the analog hardware of the era- vacuum tubes, potentiometers, resistors and capacitors. This work was ignored by biologists and physiologists of the time, and only began to be rediscovered in the 1980s, when neural networks started emerging at the hottest topic in cognitive and (as it was called then) physiological psychology. The last section of the book is concerned with the philosophers like Patricia Churchland who increasingly found herself troubled that those doing philosophy of mind and those doing psychology were working on the same problems, and yet never spoke to one another- even though each group had much to contribute to the other in refining what sorts of questions could be asked about human cognition and perception. If there is a flaw in this book it's that it's now (2011) twenty years old. Some of the theories being put forward then have found support, some have been rejected, and some have been replaced by newer models. Some, like the question of the role of NMDA receptors in Long Term Potentiation (LTM) of synapses, are still not completely understood. Tools like functional MRI (fMRI) have given the upper hand to the physiologists (for the moment, at least) and the neurophilosophers don't have quite the influence they had in the late 1980s. Yet this is still an excellent book, well worth reading. Understanding what has happened in the neurosciences in the last 20 years requires a firm knowledge of how we got here, and to that end, I would strongly recommend this book to interested lay readers, and undergraduates and high school students with and interest in the philosophy, psychology, medicine or neurophysiology..
4 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
can't judge a book by its cover,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: In the Palaces of Memory: How We Build the Worlds Inside Our Heads (Paperback)
an interesting book, to be sure: well researched and adequately written. BUT: Don't think from the title you're going to learn more about how to use the "memory palace" technique. Not gonna happen. The book is technical, almost bio-medical, in its treatment of memory. Interesting, as I said...but not if your goal is to learn a little about how memory works and a lot more about how to improve YOUR memory.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|