A great writer who, before the Holocaust, exposed and protested the treatment of the Jews was Joseph Roth, himself an Ostjuden from Galicia. In the book "The Wandering Jews" (which I highly recommend to anyone and everyone), Roth wrote about the post-WWI Jewish refugees from eastern Europe, including those who had fled to the United States. In the U.S. (circa 1930), according to Roth, "they have people who are more Jewish than the Jews, which is to say the Negroes." Were he alive today and were he to write about Israel, I suspect that Roth might refer to people there who are more Jewish than the Jews, which is to say the Palestinians.
The sad, sad irony of course is that the oppressors are now Jewish, acting under the guise of Zionism. PALESTINE IN PIECES is a compelling and distressing picture, both verbal and photographic, of their handiwork. Reading the book incensed me as few others have done in recent years, regardless of subject. The authors (both CIA political analysts back in the 1970's) state that the purpose of the book is to "show clearly, through maps and photographs rarely seen by the US public, just how permanent th[e] system of Israeli control is intended to be and what the occupation means for the daily lives of Palestinians and for their prospects of ever achieving freedom and independence." Although the book is not without flaws (relatively minor, too minor for me to enumerate here), the authors achieve their objective.
The book is based primarily on the authors' visits to Israeli-occupied territory between 2003 and 2008. It focuses primarily on the West Bank, in part because the authors were not permitted into Gaza after their first visit in 2003. The principal theme of the book is the unrelenting Israeli campaign to "cantonize" the West Bank - in the short term, to render it non-viable as a Palestinian state, both politically and economically, and in the long term unliveable for all but Jews. "Cantonize" is the authors' word; "ghettoize" might be more appropriate, for there is no question that the West Bank Palestinians are being relegated to ghettos much as European Jews were for centuries (Gaza already is a ghetto).
The authors quote Jeff Halper, an Israeli activist and opponent of the West Bank settlement campaign, who uses the Hebrew word "nishul" (meaning "dispossession") to characterize the driving force that has dictated Israel's exclusively Jewish national claims and its extension of its "ethnocracy" over all of Palestine. After 1948, the methods of accomplishing nishul shifted from expulsion of Palestinians to their containment in ever smaller, more controllable enclaves. Ultimately, the Israelis determined that "a cantonized Palestinian state separated from a greater Israel yet posing no challenge to its control of the entire country [was] the most do-able form of nishul."
In the West Bank the chief vehicle for contemporary nishul is the "Segregation Wall" - longer by several times than the Berlin Wall and twice as high, with the potential to become even more infamous in history. The authors describe in some detail the malignant purpose and effects of the Wall, and its illegality under international law. (As the authors observe, Israelis habitually attempt to justify the Wall on grounds of security; numerous points render the claim specious, but the security issue begs the question of why there are Israeli settlements on Palestinian land in the West Bank in the first place.) Augmenting the Wall and aggravating the ghettoization of the Palestinians are (a) the network of permanent terminals for access to and from the occupied territories (a network that went into operation in 2005 and 2006), (b) the web of Israeli-only roads that slices and dices the West Bank, and (c) the ongoing destruction of Palestinian homes and businesses and the expropriation of Palestinian land and water (water usage in the West Bank by settlers is already seven times per capita what it is for Palestinians). And mention should also be made of the practice of settlement towns dumping their raw, untreated sewage from their hilltop perches into Palestinian land below, some of it farmland.
As horrible as the situation is in the West Bank, it is worse in Gaza. If I were a young Palestinian in Gaza - the grandson, say, of people whose families had fled Acre in 1948 - it is almost inevitable that I would be a radicalized supporter of Hamas.
The treatment of Jewish people by European Christians was unspeakably abhorrent for centuries, culminating in the Holocaust. The Israelis seem to be repeating history, but this time as the exercisers of power and against a people who aren't European Christians (therefore rendering nugatory even some misguided notion of revenge).