Customer Reviews

Pamela: Or Virtue Rewarded (Oxford World's Classics)

5 star:		(2)
4 star:		(2)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

This is one of those books that people should take some time to read solely for it's historical significance, since it truly is a touchstone in the development of the novel as a distinct literary form. Released in 1740, it created a tidal wave of what we would now characterize as "media attention" and "popularity." Pamela was the right book at the right time and this confluence of time/place/text adds importance to the book itself.

The author, Samuel Richardson, was a commoner, without the aristocratic background of his rival, Henry Fielding or contemporary Tobias Smolett:

UNLIKE his great contemporary and rival, Henry
Fielding, Samuel Richardson could boast of no connection, however remote, with an aristocratichouse. He himself has informed us that he came
of a family " of middling note," in the county of Surrey, from which we may conjecture that his ancestors were small landed gentry or respectable yeomen. (<a href="[...]">Samuel Richardson
By Clara Linklater Thomson</a>)

Thomson's biography mentions that in the 1740's, people were still a tad fuzzy on the concept of a fictional story, "Richardson was at once overwhelmed with
letters from eager readers who longed to know
whether the story was true." (Thomson, Samuel Richardson) It is against this back drop that you need to consider the development of the english novel as a real step forward in terms of the cultural sophistication of the readers. You can literally see the human mind moving away from the simplicity of the middle ages (and its literary forms.)

I think it's fair to say that the contribution of Pamela, in a nut shell, is the depth of psychological complexity of the characters. That is what the novel is all about: adding psychological depth to the depiction of character.

And so it is that the reader finds himself/herself relating to these characters, written three hundred plus years ago. Pamela tells the story of Pamela Edwards, a serving girl of 16. Her mistress dies and his son takes over the estate. The son has a thing for Pamela, so after she rejects a couple clumsy advances, he does what any 18th century nobleman would do: Has her kidnapped and imprisoned at his remote estate.

Now, anyone reading the above will understand that the activities depicted aren't in any way contemporary, but the depiction of character is. What we are witnessing in Pamela is the birth of literary consciousness of self and identity. It's interesting to read about but at the same time at 500 pages Pamela turns into a slog at time. You can see where it is an EARLY version of the novel as literary form- sine there is a resolution/climax half way through the book, followed by 200 pages of material that would no doubt not reach print these days.

I read Pamela after learning that Samuel Richardson was Charlotte Bronte's favorite author - and that Richardson is considered to be one of the originators of the English novel. Pamela is a lovely tale,but how the girl does go on about her virtue...and virtually everything else.

the thing I liked about this book was how the main character, who is essentially the most powerless person in the story,manages to change all the other characters and her unfortunate circumstances into fortunate ones by her dogged determination "not to yield", or to say " well it is what it is - better make the best of it and get with the program".

She has her values, and she hangs onto the one thing that she values most, regardless of how much bullying she encounters, because she is not going to aid her oppresors by giving them her consent. If they want to take it , then they will have to take it by force, because she wont hand it over or make it more palatable to them by accepting their terms. She doesn't want rewards or admiration, she just wants to return to her parents so that she can continue to live her life in a way that allows her to respect herself. She gets much more than what she wanted, in the end.

I love this book! I read it in my early twenties and have read it quite often through the years. It may not be everyone's cup-of-tea but as an avid reader of romance novels it's interesting to see how the genre has changed over the centuries. Richardson meant the work to be a parable for why women should hold on to their virtue, but over the centuries it has become more of a romance than a parable. This is not as graphic as Clarissa (no rape), which makes this a much better book. Anyway, it's worth a read.

This really is a beautifully written book. It takes a little longer to read than most of its length because of the wording, but its worth it. You just want to savor every word. The best part is how unchanging pamela's values remain throughout the whole book. Her feelings toward other characters change but never her morals. Great read.