4 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting read, but the evidence falls short, November 2, 2007
This review is from: Pan's Travail: Environmental Problems of the Ancient Greeks and Romans (Ancient Society and History) (Paperback)
The fall of the classical civilizations, particularly Rome, has engendered intense scholarly debate for centuries. In Pan's Travail, Hughes posits an answer that has seldom entered into the dialogue of historians: environmental degradation. Hughes' stance is unabashedly that of the environmentalist; readers will encounter the occasional diatribe against exploitation of natural resources and other social commentary. The book is intended for a general audience, and makes for a very interesting reading. Though the author depends too heavily on ancient texts for his evidence, he does make an excellent case for the general scope of Greco-Roman impact on their landscape. However, he fails to connect this impact with the actual collapse of those civilizations in a meaningful way. An interesting and informative read, but ultimately unconvincing.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting but somewhat flimsy, August 11, 2005
This review is from: Pan's Travail: Environmental Problems of the Ancient Greeks and Romans (Ancient Society and History) (Paperback)
Pan's Travail covers an interesting topic and is reasonably thorough in looking at the different aspects of environmental problems in Classical times. It does have several problems of its own, though, albeit no fatal ones.
First, while Hughes surveys many different subjects, his examination of each is fairly superficial. He spends much time listing examples and not enough time synthesizing. The sources he cites are too often literary, and therefore of dubious accuracy--Hughes generally seems to accept the written word of the Romans and Greeks a little too readily. More archeological data would have helped. A lesser niggle is the frequent repetition in Hughes's writing, though it seems more a case of bad editing than anything else.
A more substantial stylistic and intellectual fault of the book is its clear ideological stance. That Hughes is an environmentalist of some stripe is obvious though not troubling in itself. However, his analyses come from only a single narrow perspective, viewing everything through the lens of, "people irresponsibly and imorally harming good Mother Nature." He does little to ask why Greeks and Romans may have acted as they did, except to cite greed and ignorance. As a result, Hughes fires off moral judgments rather easily and makes some strange out-of-left-field statements. For instance, in his conclusion, he writes, "...at this period, so little was known about how natural processes work that rationality was of little use."
Hughes' bias does not totally distort his presentation but doesn't make for a very even-handed analysis either. (I was actually surprised to read, on the back of the book, that he's a professor of history and not of conservation.) This may or may not deter you, but be forewarned. If numerous references to man's destructive greed and "Mother Earth" make you uncomfortable (even if you sympathize), you may want to steer clear.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No