Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Paradoxes from A to Z Paperback – May 12, 2002


See all 7 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Rent from
$4.71
Paperback
"Please retry"
$8.99 $0.01

There is a newer edition of this item:

Paradoxes from A to Z
$27.54
(2)
In Stock.


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE
Image
Looking for the Audiobook Edition?
Tell us that you'd like this title to be produced as an audiobook, and we'll alert our colleagues at Audible.com. If you are the author or rights holder, let Audible help you produce the audiobook: Learn more at ACX.com.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 232 pages
  • Publisher: Routledge (May 12, 2002)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0415228093
  • ISBN-13: 978-0415228091
  • Product Dimensions: 0.7 x 5.5 x 8.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,821,062 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

'Self-contained courses in paradox are not usually taught as part of a philosophy degree. There is good reason for thinking they should be, and this book would make the ideal text for just such a course.' – Times Higher Education Supplement

'Clark's survey is an entertaining junkshop of mind-troubling problems.' – The Guardian

--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

About the Author

Michael Clark is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Nottingham.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

15 of 17 people found the following review helpful By A Philosophy Guy on June 26, 2007
Format: Paperback
Let me begin by saying that I am happy that I own this book. The price was right and I use it to look up paradoxes with which I am not familiar. That said, the treatment is brutally bad in spots, and does not convey a sense of the true recalcitrance of many of the paradoxes. As one example, take the first entry is the book, Achilles and the Tortoise. Clark seems to take the line that since we can sum infinite series, there is no more paradox:

"So the sequence of partial sums is 1/2, 3/4, 7/8,... It goes on for ever, getting closer and closer ('converging') to 1. In this case 1 is the limit, and so the sum, of the series. Achilles gradually closes in on the tortoise until he reaches it."

What? The "explanation" continues by simply explaining limits. This is inane hand waving. Worse still, Clark cites Salmon's excellent collection of articles on Zeno's paradoxes (of which Achilles and the Tortoise is one). A main theme of many of the articles in Salmon's book is that limits do NOT dissolve the paradox.

In the same entry as Achilles, Clark discusses Thomson's Lamp, where the dominant line taken today is that there is no spatio-temporal continuity through an infinite sequence of tasks. "But the description of the supertask entails nothing about the lamp's state at one minute..."

So be it. But then in "explaining" Achilles, Clark writes, "Why then is Achilles at the limit, 1? ... The answer is that, if he is anywhere, as surely he is- he must be at 1."

The problem is the "as surely he is." This echoes Thomson's own, "Surely the lamp must be on or off." If there is no (spatio-temporal) continuity through an infinite task, as was just explained to dissolve Thomson's Lamp, how is there continuity in the case of Achilles?
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By M. Maxwell on January 31, 2011
Format: Paperback
I had high hopes for this book, but found it disappointing. First, it is a comprehensive resource for the most well known paradoxes, and it strikes a good balance between accessibility and the technical aspect of this subject. For paradoxes involving math (Cantor's/Galileo's/Monty Hall/Two-envelope) it serves as a good primer.

After reading a few of the entries I got the feeling that this author dismisses the concept of paradox out of hand. That's over-simplifying it a bit, but pretty close to the mark. Of course, not all paradoxes are worthy of serious consideration - some fall under the "amazing but true" (Simpson's/Placebo) or the "complete BS" (Buridan's) categories - but most, especially those which have been debated for thousands of years, are perplexing for good reason.

Take for example the "Heraclitus/Ship of Theseus" paradox, which the author proclaims as fallacies in the book. At the end of the chapter the issues they raise persist... the question of what makes a thing the same thing after undergoing changes through time is not resolved by stating that the premises are flawed.

Same with "The Heap". Determining at what point something changes from one thing in to something else during a gradual process is not a mere exercise in abstraction, it is crucial in sociology, economics, legal theory, biology... to say nothing of one's fundamental outlook on the universe. Other important fallacies given just a cursory glance include the paradox of "Knowability" (AKA Meno's) and the paradox of "Analysis". The latter is especially threatening, as it proposes that all deductions are trivial which would have grave implications for logic itself.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
great stuff. I have never seen such elegant and succinct a treatment of
so many puzzling things as Clark has here provided.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
By L. King on December 4, 2011
Format: Paperback
And that is the problem. The picture of the chicken and the egg on the cover is the most entertaining aspect of the book. The explanations are alphabetical, easy to understand, the collection reasonably complete - and reading it is boring.

Paradoxes are supposed to be fun. The contradictions should gobsmack you at the back of your head and turn you upside down looking for a way to get out. This is more like the guidance councilor talking to you about sex - after listening to her talk you wonder what all the fuss was about and you lose all interest.

A useful reference for schools or public libraries. Since I love self referential conundrums I'll keep it around, but for more fun try Vicious Circles and Infinity: An Anthology of Paradoxes, This Book Does Not Exist, Paradoxes (by Sainsbury), Martin Gardiner's aha! Gotcha: Paradoxes to Puzzle and Delight or anything at all by Raymond Smullyan.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
7 of 11 people found the following review helpful By Patrick Linnen on August 6, 2004
Format: Paperback
24 short (1-3 page) treatments of various paradoxes. The main problem with this book is the unequal quality from one description to another. My best guess as to the target audience would be under graduate philosophy students.

'Gould, Escher and Bach' is a better book for those interested in paradoxes.
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?