Most Helpful Customer Reviews
18 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Enjoyable but disappointing, June 1, 2003
This review is from: The Passions of Andrew Jackson (Hardcover)
First and foremost, THE PASSIONS OF ANDREW JACKSON is compelling. This short book moves along at a quick pace. While the early life stories of some historic figures are dull necessities in larger biographies, Jackson's early life is the action-packed focus of this biography. The story of Andrew Jackson is a story of violence, sex scandal and adventure. Author Andrew Burstein does a good job of maximizing the drama of the story, and I enjoyed reading it very much. Yet, while on the whole, THE PASSIONS OF ANDREW JACKSON is an enjoyable book, it also contains a major disappointment: Burstein's treatment of Jackson's presidency. Burstein set out to write a book about Jackson's character with an emphasis on exploring his friendships. He explicitly did not intend to chronicle Jackson's presidency, so his brief treatment of that part of Jackson's life was not especially surprising. It was, however, disappointing for a number of reasons. To begin with, Burstein hurls the gauntlet in his introduction at other Jackson biographers, especially "the reigning Jackson authority," Robert Remini. His basic criticism of Remini, who wrote a three-volume biography of Jackson, is that Remini bought into Jacksonian mythology a bit too much. By contrast, Burstein sets as his goal writing about Jackson as he really was. I found the assault on Remini to be odd and out of place. Remini's last volume was published in 1984, so I'm not sure why Burstein felt the need to justify writing a new book. More importantly, by contrasting his own book with Remini's, Burstein suggests a parallelism that doesn't really exist. THE PASSIONS OF ANDREW JACKSON is much more limited in scope than Remini's work. Its focus is almost exclusively on who Jackson was rather than what he did. Burstein falls short in not explaining enough what Jackson did. He assumes the reader's familiarity with the Jackson record and policy-making style. He alludes to important events associated with Jackson, such as the tragic "trail of tears," without fully explaining Jackson's role. Burstein probably could have done the job with an additional 20 pages, but it almost seems that the author lost interest in his own work at the point Jackson became president. The overall quality of the story degenerates after that. Burstein made his point already, the rest of Jackson's life is glossed over. The final several pages of reflective, explanatory writing seems almost redundant, which is a problem in a short book. What is Burstein's point? It seems to be that Jackson was an impulsive, violent, unreflective man whose popularity was out of sync with his aptitudes for governing. His success at arousing emotional public support for short-sighted policies was the dark side of democracy. Beyond that, Burstein seems to very subtly be drawing a comparison between Jacksonian era politics and the politics of today, but this point is not developed probably because Burstein wanted his book to last. But by including this implied, under-developed comparison at all he fails to develop other implications, such as the idea that the early founders' elitist republicanism may have been a superior form of governance (another of Burstein's implications). In the end Burstein's only conclusions that stick are about Jackson's character, and not how any of this means anything larger. The most disappointing aspect of THE PASSIONS OF ANDREW JACKSON is that there hasn't been a well-known popular Jackson biography published for several years. Jackson was too important a figure for "the reigning authority" to keep his crown for 20 years without a new contribution. As enjoyable as THE PASSIONS OF ANDREW JACKSON is, if Remini holds the title, Burstein does not quite pose a threat to win it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A good book for a rainy day..., May 10, 2005
This review is from: The Passions of Andrew Jackson (Hardcover)
While the book was a pretty enjoyable read, I am not really sure that Burstein accomplished what he set out to do.
It seems en vogue nowadays to go against the grain when writing biographies, and Burstein's effort is no exception. I decided to read this book after seeing an hour-long documentary of Jackson on the History Channel.
I was particularly interested in the executions of Ambrister and Arbuthnot. Ironically in a book filled with anti-Jackson material this event wasn't covered in as much detail as I figured it would be.
While it doesn't appear that Burstein set out to discredit Andrew Jackson's image, the book definitely trends toward the negative. Burstein uses a lot of Jackson's own words, and in many cases they aren't pretty. Burstein also keeps a running count of all of the duels, scuffles and scrapes that Andrew Jackson was drawn into to protect his honor. Burstein DOES discuss Jackson's devote love towards Rachel Donelson Robards, (even if the events leading up to the marriage are rightly questioned) and as well as his acts of charity, but the majority of the books serves to tear down Jackson's image.
Burstein does try to account for Jackson's flaws by discussing the political and social environment of the times, as will as addressing the fact that Jackson was the first President from 'the frontier', however I was left with the impression that Jackson was an extremist, when it came to protecting his honor. With Jackson there were no middle grounds, it was a personal affront to him to disagree with him politically.
Some of the book reads more as a general history book with Jackson as the main character rather then a biography. This is good in the sense that it may peak the reader's curiosity (as it did mine) to learn more about Burr, Calhoun, Clay and Monroe.
One very irritating part of the book, as one reader has already mentioned was Burstein's lack of structure with regards to his references. Bursteins uses 'notes' and while they are easy to follow, I found myself flipping to the back of the book way too much. What was really annoying was the fact that several of the notes were a paragraph long and should have probably been included in the main text of the book.
While Burstein uses his 'Introduction' to alert that reader that what he is about to write is not a 'heroic saga' as many prior biographers have written, after reading this book I was left wondering whether the definitive Jackson biography is still waiting to be written.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Purposes of a Biography, January 2, 2005
This review is from: The Passions of Andrew Jackson (Hardcover)
Biographies concentrate on many subjects - detailed analysis of actions and their motives, character studies, descriptions of times and events or, as in this case, an examination into what motivated the seventh president of the United States to do and say what he did. I sympathize with reviewers who castigate the author for skimming historical events, but he plainly states that the purpose of this book was an explortaion of the early 19th century mindset and what makes it so "American" and even compelling to this day.
As a Tennessean, where AJ takes on demigod status, I judged the author to be harsh but in the end, just. The question persists - were his "passions" atypical of the times? One must remember that Jackson's life encompassed the most important years of the nation. A Revolutionary War incident forever soured his view of Britain. He witnessed the founding of the Republic, the settling of the West, the coming of age of the body politic. He may be a grand - even great - figure but his flaws are legendary and it is these upon which Burstein dwelled.
Whether it was slavery, duels, treatment of Indians, inability to compromise, hot temper or pattern of blaming others for his own mistakes, AJ fares poorly. What is missing is that inner self so brilliantly illuninated in recent books on Franklin, Hamilton and Adams. What caused his monomania over the US Bank, why could he never accept criticism, keep friends? In a sense, he was a "modern" politician - opponents were not simply mistaken but instead were morally corrupt.
It is the politics that is missing. I mean, he was President for two terms through sheer force of will. A diehard Jeffersonian, a believer in an agrarian American, a populist, a foe of "special interests", a defender of states rights. His ideas changed once in office and that in itself would have made for good reading. All in all, a good overview.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|