Amazon.com Review
"Even presidents have private lives," declared Bill Clinton in August 1998, as he admitted his affair with Monica Lewinsky to a live television audience. Yet in recent years, a cursory examination of news coverage would suggest that almost nothing about politicians' lives is private. Most Americans--as well as journalists--would have it otherwise, write media experts Larry J. Sabato (of the University of Virginia), Mark Stencel (politics editor of the
Washington Post's Web site), and S. Robert Lichter (of the Center for Media and Public Affairs). In
Peepshow, they propose a few rules governing what should and should not be off-limits to the press. Acceptable areas of coverage, in their view, include financial information about candidates, health as it pertains to job performance, "any incident or charge that reaches the police blotters or a civil or criminal court," sexual activity that blurs private and public duties, debilitating behavior (such as drug use), and private behavior that involves public funds. Out of bounds are nonlegal matters involving a pol's family, discrete extramarital sex, sexual orientation, and past drug or alcohol abuse.
What makes Peepshow an engaging book is its string of up-to-the-minute anecdotes. The authors take real-life incidents that made it into the press and assess whether they should have been there in the first place. When Colin Powell's wife convinced her husband not to run for president, a few media outlets reported that she had been treated for depression. This, say the authors, is out of bounds. On the other hand, the story of a Republican member of Congress from North Carolina who allegedly caused a traffic accident, left the scene, and traded places with his wife in the passenger seat before returning is worth public examination. Sabato, Stencel, and Lichter relate dozens of similar examples, touching upon recent stories and rumors involving Bob Dole, Newt Gingrich, Rudy Giuliani, Al Gore, Henry Hyde, and others. The book at times reads like a gossip column; even political junkies may find themselves saying, "I didn't know that!" about certain figures. But the point is not to titillate. The authors earnestly lay out a few principles that, if followed, will make the news business seem more dignified, even when it's covering indignity. --John J. Miller
From Publishers Weekly
Here, joining forces with news editor Stencel and media analyst Lichter, Sabato (University of Virginia) revisits questions he originally raised in his 1991 book Feeding Frenzy: How Attack Journalism Has Transformed American Politics. In that text, he proposed that a politician's private life should be subject to public scrutiny only in limited circumstances, such as when it comes to health and use of public funds--not regarding internal family matters and past sexual activity. In this latest analysis of the relationship between the media and electoral politics, the authors attempt to make sense of the state of the media and several recent political contretemps, and show how the guidelines laid out in Feeding Frenzy are less and less applied. Today's accelerated news cycles, they suggest, contribute to the escalation of reporting with weaker standards of proof (they also assert that candidates who campaign on popular television shows--think Leno and Letterman-- cheapen political discourse). The authors flesh out their arguments with case studies: press coverage of Georgia attorney general Michael Bowers's adultery, they argue, was legitimate (if overemphatic), since he admitted publicly to the infidelity and supported state laws criminalizing adultery; reporters' accusations that New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani committed adultery, on the other hand, were questionable, since there was no evidence. Even with these salutary standards, the authors acknowledge that gray areas remain; deciding what constitutes hypocrisy, they note, can be highly subjective. Still, treading carefully through complex terrain, Stencel, Lichter and Sabato manage to illuminate workable guidelines for navigating the line between public and private. (Apr.)
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc.