|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
20 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Real Arthur,
By Scout (VA USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Pendragon: The Definitive Account of the Origins of Arthur (Paperback)
Pendragon: The Definitive Account of the Origins of Arthur does indeed come closest of all the Arthurian literature to identifying the real 6th century man. Mssrs. Blake and Lloyd do a great job of peeling away the later Medieval romanticist mythology to get at the northern Welsh warband leader as depicted in the original Welsh texts. Their examination of the geographic locations associated with Arthur and his compatriots is much more plausible an explanation than any other. Enlightening and again sound is their assertion that he fought most, or even all, of his battles against fellow Welsh Britons rather than Saxons (except possibly at Badon).
If there is one criticism it would be that the authors failed to follow their own evidence to what seems to me to be an obvious conclusion. They claim that Arthur was only a war leader and never a king but admit that Arthur is not a Welsh name. From their own information, it is possible that he started as a war leader under King Maelgwn of Gwynneth, where one of Arthur's hill fort 'courts' resides and where the early documents reveal to be his original homeland. Yet, he may have later become a king in his own right, the one they identify as Cuneglasus of the Bear's Stronghold. (Arthur comes from the Latin Artoris, which means The Bear.) He may well have been one of the adulterous underlings that Gildas criticized but also later one of the five kings who Gildas likewise lambasted. The second hill fort 'court' they identify lies within the small realm of that minor Welsh king. It is a real possibility that Arthur was Cuneglasus. As they point out, it was Gildas who attached animal names to the five kings he criticized, that one being the Bear. They also cite several early Welsh texts that call him a king or sovereign as well. Their analysis of the origin of Pendragon, as part of that discussion, is ingenious. All in all, for anyone who is interested in clearing away the Medieval Romance and finding out about the real Arthur, this is probably the most important tome to read. I heartily recommend it.
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Painstakingly researched,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Pendragon: The Definitive Account of the Origins of Arthur (Paperback)
Pendragon is Blake and Lloyd's second book, and builds creditably on their first one, Keys to Avalon. They have painstakingly documented the evidence which leads them to the conclusion that Arthur was Welsh and lived, fought, and died in Wales. The evidence for this appears incontrovertible, even if the particular details are not necessarily as easily fleshed out. If nothing else, this is an incredibly important gift to Arthurian research, which hopefully will eventually supercede the always dubious, Arthurian claims of regions from Cornwall to Scotland.
As an anthropologist, I most appreciate their attention to the differences in language and culture which prompted later chroniclers and authors to shift Arthur from his original location to Great Britain as a whole. Anyone looking for the 'real', historical Arthur will find him here.
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Pendragon, The Definitive Account of the Origins of Arthur,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Pendragon: The Definitive Account of the Origins of Arthur (Hardcover)
One of the best written historical references I have had the pleasure to read. Gives a historical document based evaluation of the Authurian theory.
25 of 36 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Who was King Arthur?,
By
This review is from: Pendragon: The Definitive Account of the Origins of Arthur (Hardcover)
Who was King Arthur? The honest answer is, "We don't know." However, it certainly is a lot more fun to at least try to see what the evidence says. And in that vein, this book excellently approaches answering that question by looking at the oldest Arthur evidence written more closely in time to when Arthur would have lived and written in a tongue that he was more likely to have spoken. While it's true that for most people these limitations would produce only a small amount of literature akin to a book of haiku, this book uses that evidence as a starting point to make educated suppositions as to who Arthur was and when he lived. For those who's interest in Arthur was piqued by the recent movie featuring Keira Knightly in a leather bikini, it's an interesting topic so read the book. To those who've read only the book, go see the movie because you need to get out more.
4.0 out of 5 stars
Was there a King Arthur,
By J. Finkelstein "music theatre goer" (Grayville, Illinois United States) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Pendragon: The Definitive Account of the Origins of Arthur (Paperback)
This book, Pendragon: The Definitive Account of the Origins of Arthur ,
is an attempt to determine the truth about this famour king. It is an excellant text for those who are interested in this subject. My only reason for giving it four stars and not five, is that it is very tough reading. All of the name, places, etc, are Welsh making the text very hard to follow. But I really liked and enjoyed it. |
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Pendragon: The Definitive Account of the Origins of Arthur by Scott Lloyd (Paperback - August 1, 2006)
Used & New from: $10.68
| ||