6 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Dense and Dull, October 16, 2010
This review is from: The Penguin History of Modern China: The Fall and Rise of a Great Power, 1850-2009 (Paperback)
I have yet to read a book that convincingly explains how the teetering Manchu-dominated empire of the mid-19th century was eventually transformed into a republic, a Communist dictatorship and then a capitalist power that could become the world's biggest economy in the foreseeable future.
This attempt is no different and is hard going despite the plethora of rave reviews and the author's impressive credentials*. It is a 700-page page slog, pitted with statistics**, accounts of beheadings, atrocities, battles and power struggles.
The author gets bogged down in too many details and makes little attempt to describe the background and significance of events to the lay reader.
We get chapter after chapter of accounts of the rise and fall of leaders. As many of them were of limited historical importance, one wonders why so much space is devoted to them, particularly the warlord generals and gang leaders with names like Big Ears, Dogmeat and Old Crow.
Trivia abounds. "Zhou Enlai lost control of his bowels and soiled his trousers" at one point when he feared that Mao Zedong was about die. Apparently the Soviet leader, Nikita Khrushchev "did not know to swim and had to bob around in a rubber ring" while conversing with Mao in a swimming pool
The place names are also confusing to a Western reader. There are provinces called Shaanxi and Shanxi, Henan and Hunan and Liaoing and Liaoning. Familiar names like Canton and Shanghai have been replaced by Guangzhou and Hangzhou, respectively.
Obviously there is nothing the author can do about this. However, he could at least try and make things simpler or give the reader a general explanation of the regional or strategic importance of the comings and goings of the armies sweeping through once province to another and then back again. The maps could also be a lot better.
The style is rather quaint at times and the author uses words like "memorial" (like Mr. Dick in "David Copperfield") instead of "memorandum". He refers to the "gentry" as though writing about fox-hunting English squires rather than (presumably) the Chinese merchant class.
This quirkiness is probably a leftover from his days at "The Economist" - a weekly magazine that describes itself as a newspaper - where eccentricity is encouraged as a means of covering up shallow thinking.
My conclusion is that China is beyond the scope of any writer, particularly a Westerner. It is just too big to fit into any conventional history. As the author says, the Chinese "can be regarded as being part of a common culture rather than a naturally cohesive country."
*As they include "The Economist" and "Independent" for which he worked, one can reasonably question their sincerity.
**Did you know that the South Manchurian Railway Company had 13,621 employees in 1908?
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No