Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Not one of my favorite Schulman books at first . . ., June 27, 2008
This review is from: People in Trouble (Plume) (Paperback)
I didn't love this book as much as other Sarah Schulman novels at first. But it grows on me over time. The story is based on her personal experiences and parts of it were foreign to me since I never lived in an kind of ghetto. For folks outside the gay urban community of that time, it may seem as foreign as the environment in a Shakespeare play.
There's no need to mention the many similiarities with RENT because these were acknowledged by the composer J. Larson before he died. More importantly, discussing comparisons between RENT and People in Trouble mistakenly gives the impression that the two works of art are comparable in important ways, which is absolutely not true. It *is* possible to enjoy one without trashing the other, but when you put them side by side, the musical strikes some false notes to people who actually lived through the early years of the AIDS epidemic, or who were gay and lived during the 70s and 80's.
Larson's musical is a romanticized version of poverty and true love and has some beloved songs and touching scenes. The various characters are whitewashed as is to be expected for Broadway audiences; no body odor, no unpleasant character traits - and neither poverty and heroin addiction can destroy those beautiful white teeth and that shiny hair. Its a lovely but false story like the black and white TV characters in PLEASANTVILLE and it's a great example of art as escapist fare.
Sarah Schulman's novel is a real world version of the AIDS and gay experience story, and it will be harder reading for some people as a result. It may seem a 'rougher' experience, but think of it this way: if you look at two bowls side by side: one unearthed by archeologists from 4000 BC, and the other made by a 20th century artisan that is stunningly crafted and finished, the later bowl is clearly more beautiful. BUT THE OLDER BOWL WAS THE FIRST ONE, AND THE PERSON WHO ACTUALLY INVENTED THAT FIRST 'BOWL' IS a whole universe more original than the 20th century craftsman who made something beautiful after studying 6000 other attempts.
Also: reading People in Trouble is uncomfortable only when it's *meant* to be uncomfortable. It doesn't have accidentally ugly implications that make your pleasure feel a bit guilty. In contrast, the musical occasionaly presents lies about the early AIDS experience in New York, and also makes the unfortunate choice of depicting, side by side, 1) a nasty bickering lesbian relationship; 2) a sad-but-sweet gay relationship that ends in death; adn 3) a sexy and romantic straight relationship that is the only one to survive the end of the show. Oppression comes in a new guise these days.
No matter how you try to get around it, that kind of thoughtless prioritizing of a straight relationship over the gay ones is pretty damaging for so many people. You'd only know this if you every had the fifty million models for your own life taken away as if they'd never existed.
So this novel is a great experience for peopel who want to know about AIDS in the early years, and for gays and lesbians who want to know their history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Absolutely nothing like Rent-, March 15, 2005
This review is from: People in Trouble (Plume) (Paperback)
I admit, the claims that this book was the actual (and unacknowledged) basis for Rent may have colored my perceptions; the book certainly suffered by the comparison. Taken on its own merits it's an acceptable novel. However, it is nothing at all like Rent.
I only purchased this after reading all the Amazon reviews of the Rent book. Every negative review mentioned this novel. Strangely, all of the reviews were anonymous, or from "readers" who had reviewed nothing else, which does not lend them much credibility. This always makes me picture one angry author, or one desperate fan, entering review after review.
People in Trouble is the story of a married couple, Peter and Kate, and Kate's affair with a woman named Molly. The background is the birth of AIDS activism in NYC, and Peter and Kate's successful careers in the arts. It takes place in the summer.
Rent is the story of a group of friends who are kicked out of their homes by a former roommate, who has since become wealthy. In the background is the struggle to live with HIV, homelessness, and questioning the validity of bohemianism. It takes place at Christmas.
There are some similarities: both have riots and tent cities. Both make passing mention of people wearing watches with alarms to remind them to take their AZT. Both have "Robin Hood" subplots- in Rent the ATM is reprogrammed to furnish a "stipend" to anyone who puts in the right code. In People in Trouble, activists steal credit card numbers from restaurant carbons and from eavesdropping at pay phones, which they then use to help those in need. There the similarities end.
The mood of Rent is upbeat and hopeful. The characters are warm, humorous and vaguely mocking, and the music unsurpassed.
The characters of People in Trouble are self involved, pretentious and moody, and the overall tone, while not ironic enough to be called "dark" is certainly gray.
Skip this book, buy the cd to Rent.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Great Book- The basis for RENT?, April 22, 1998
This review is from: People in Trouble (Plume) (Paperback)
Sarah Schulman is one of my very favorite writers in the world. Heck, just the fact she's on the planet makes me smile. In People in Trouble, Schulman returns to themes in all her books, Queerness, loss, and being lost. Incidentally, the plot of this novel is a heck of a lot like that musical RENT. So similar that it can't be a coincidence. And this book came first....
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|