From Publishers Weekly
For Perry Farrell fans who have read all the articles about him, there isn't any new ground covered in Thompson's account. There are no true confessions here: no pulling back the curtain to find out who the real wizard is. Thompson (Red Hot Chili Peppers) chronicles Farrell's life from his boyhood in Flushing, Queens, to his adolescence in Miami and onward to Los Angeles. This is where he forms his first band, Psi Com, before finding his first fame, with Jane's Addiction. It's obvious that Thompson considers Farrell a man of genius, but the evidence offered only points to a genius for self-promotion. We never get inside Farrell's head, or even close. Thompson has pieced together things that may or may not be true, because Farrell is the first to admit he's lied in interviews. Thompson can't really do any more than scratch the surface of so secretive and ambiguous a person. Even after finishing Thompson's biography, Perry Farrell remains a mystery: which, if the book is any indication, is the way Farrell wants it. Photos not seen by PW.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
Rock'n'roll biographies are generally lightweight fare, and there's nothing inherently wrong with that. This one, however, commits the cardinal sin of taking far too seriously an artist who, taken on the evidence the book itself provides, is only a marginally talented musician with an outsized ego. Farrell came to prominence in the late 1980s as the leader of the successful, if derivative, Jane's Addiction and as the organizing force behind Lollapalooza, an itinerant and highly successful alternative-rock package show. As a publicist and an impresario, then, Farrell is clearly gifted. As a thinker and social commentator, however, he is sadly lacking?a fact that author Thompson (Depeche Mode, St. Martin's, 1994) appears to miss completely. Nowhere does the author make a serious attempt to evaluate or analyze Farrell's music, and rarely does he offer any challenge to Farrell's assertions or offer any contrasting perspective. Thompson's writing is not only painfully uncritical; it is also shot through with hysterically funny malapropisms and tortured syntax. Not recommeded. (Photos not seen.)?Rick Anderson, Contoocook, N.H.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.