Most Helpful Customer Reviews
28 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good, but still not the book Petrosian deserves, July 26, 2007
This review is from: Petrosian vs the Elite: 71 Victories by the Master of Manoeuvre 1946-1983 (Paperback)
The main reason Petrosian won for so many years is that no one could figure him out. That remains true today. Kasparov makes a great contribution, but the final remarks he quotes from different masters on Petrosian show that unfortunately the memory of Petrosian is dominated by his match strategy in the 1971 world championship cycle [after he had already played in three world championship matches] in which he tried to totally restrain his opponents and took two matches by winning just one game each. His amazing win rate in Olympiads and record in tournaments, Soviet Championships, and Interzonals is mathematically impossible for a drawing master. Vasiliev unfortunately spends his entire book trying to show that he is a sparkling tactician. That's fine but it misses the uniqueness of Petrosian's style. Soltis' poor book sees Petrosian as an ugly pragmatist. Who could deny that Petrosian had a unique and mystifying style? So, as with Spassky, I have waited a long time to read the book that would be a monument to his career.
There are some good annotations in this book and the games are very well chosen. However, there are no photographs, the introduction is skimpy [15 pages] and there are no introductions to the games at all. The book is a collection of annotations without context that dehumanizes this unique personality and his intensely personal struggles and fascinating clashes of style with characters like Korchnoi. Each game deserved at least a little introduction to set up and enrich the reader's appreciation of the games as sporting events and fierce human struggles. I kept going to other books to look up where he stood in a tournament or match. If as a lover of chess, you want to enjoy Petrosian, then this book is really just a companion to Kasparov who gives a much richer treatment that brings Petrosian's games to life. Keene has made a career of pumping out little books. A second edition that addresses the inadequacies could also be the monument to Keene's career as a chess writer as well as the great book on Petrosian.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
18 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A "weak" world champion? Not on your life, July 21, 2007
This review is from: Petrosian vs the Elite: 71 Victories by the Master of Manoeuvre 1946-1983 (Paperback)
Some world champions are seen by the chess public as "weak" and "boring". Petrosian is one. This injustice is corrected by Keene's latest book, which gives us 71 of his victories.
Nowadays, with databases and computers, to find games and variations is easy, so quality depends on explaining which variations are critical in "real life" (something computers are still not that good at) and how the variations are tied together into an overall game plan. Here, Keene and Simpole do a good job. The annotations are detailed, try to explain why the game "worked out" as it did, and--an indicator of quality--the opponent's moves are sometimes praised and Petrosian's sometimes criticized. Sadly, Keene's overheated writing is sometimes on display: "the entire black army is consigned to an Hadean frozen lake of Dante-esque or Miltonic dimension", he writes of Petrosian-Fisher, 1959.
Keene writes both good and bad books. The more Keene cares about his subject, the better the book. He cares most about unfairly-maligned or misunderstood chapions of the past; his best books are those about Staunton, Nimzowitsch, and--now--Petrosian. If only there wasn't so much chaff in Keene's total output along with the wheat.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
27 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Petrosian in a full glory of his play, January 6, 2007
This review is from: Petrosian vs the Elite: 71 Victories by the Master of Manoeuvre 1946-1983 (Paperback)
When I looked at the shelf of the book store, when on trip to Amsterdam two months ago, it came as complete surprise to me finding this book. It was thick, fine packed, and most surprisingly it was about Petrosian. In last two months having it I came to conclusion that this is a classic. First of all it has 71 fantastically annotated games divided into eight chapters, Introduction and Significant moments in career are nicely described, and at the end of book Tournament tables speaks for itself.
I didn't ever studied much of Petrosian, so his style of play and unique ideas in almost every game gave me much joy. Descriptive style of authors Ray Keene and Julian Simpole is ideal for long, enjoyfull and consuming study of the games at the real chess board on the table.
Since the era of computers came, any Petrosian game actually needed some kind of checking and revision. And without much of annoyance author excellently incorporated that in their analysis. I had even much fun studying knowing that Petrosian positional style is becked and verified in that manner too.
One thing I didn't understood: name of the eight chapter is "Gotterdammerung". Is it a typo for some german translation or what.
I warmly recommend this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|