| ||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Well, it's...different.,
By B "evilbee" (USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Phantom of the Opera (Paperback)
Having been a phan for over a decade, I enjoy reading other authors' spins on the timeless story of Erik. This book was interesting. It's not the worst POTO spin-off I've read, but not the best, either.
The book follows Leroux more than anything, but there are some major adjustments to the story. Raoul is very likeable (I found it very difficult not to want him to end up with Christine!), very smart, and isn't so childish and petty as he is in Leroux. Christine isn't as naive as she was in Leroux, although she's still fairly gullible. Philippe, Raoul's brother, encourages Raoul to pursue a serious relationship with Christine, is happily married, and is actually funny and warm. And Erik is insane - as in literally mood-swings-that-make-you-dizzy-just-reading-about-them, stark-raving-mad, insane. Erik spends much of his time running around and jumping up and down like a little boy, laughing maniacally, and trying to kill people who get in his way. The time frame is also a bit different - the story is set in 1888 (which explains the mention of the Eiffel Tower in the book, as construction started in 1887). The biggest disappointment I had with this book was the ending. I won't give it away - but let's just say that the beatiful themes of redemption and undying love that are found in Leroux's book just aren't in Bischoff's tale. Leroux's Erik is so complex - a genius, a madman, a murderer, a composer, and so much more - and I cannot help but feel empathy for him. Bischoff's Erik, however, is rather flat in comparison. I laughed at some of his antics, but I didn't feel a connection with the character at all. I think your level of enjoyment of this book depends on what you are looking for in a Phantom story. If you're looking for a romantic Erik, definitely skip this book. If you're looking for a story of redemption, this isn't the book for you. If you're searching for a faithful retelling of Leroux, steer clear. But if you're looking for an Erik that is insane, if you're looking to laugh a bit, or if you are a huge phan and must have every book ever written about Erik, well, you might enjoy this.
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Very...interesting,
By Phantom Phan (My swivel chair in front of my computer) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Phantom of the Opera (Paperback)
This is the type of 'Phantom' novel you either like or you hate. It is definately not a copy of the Leroux version, that's for sure. Erik doesn't get very much page space until the end of the book and he is written as being somewhat more...hyperactive than the other versions. The storyline deviates very drastically from the Leroux version and it's not a book for die-hard purists out there. In this version Christine and Raoul have never met before, until the night when she made her debut. Christine has never met Erik face-to-mask either before he takes her down to his lair after kidnapping her from the stage. He then acts somewhat bi-polar and more of a madman than the feel you get from the others. Raoul ends up meeting up with the Persian as in the Leroux novel, but he and Erik aren't as friendly with one another as they were in the Leroux novel or the Susan Kay novel. They really didn't seem much more than aquaintances. Erik's backstory was delved into more in this, though, not nearly as much as in the Susan Kay version. The ending is not at all close to the original novel, save the inclusion of the scorpion and the grasshopper. Also a slight twist...but that's all I can say without giving the book away.I'd recommend it to obsessed phans as a must-read. I myself found it very enjoyable and thought that Erik was adorable, but that's just me. One little thing that I thought was humorous, but that could be percieved as nit-picking: Bischoff mentions Raoul and Christine went out on a little day trip and saw the Effiel Tower. This is very interesting as this version of PotO took place in 1881 and contruction on the Effiel Tower did not begin until the twenty-third of January, 1887.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Horror version of Phantom....and it's for kids too!!!,
This review is from: Phantom of the Opera (Paperback)
After going over the various reviews on this page I realized some people just don't know Phantom, don't get me wrong one or two of you were kind to the book, but most of you must of lied when you clicked yes to the are you over 13 question. This book is not for the romantic phantom lover, it was written before 1986, so the phantom is more of a murderous deformed madman than a half-disfigured Valentino. What Bischoff really did is take the Lon Chaney, Claude Rains, and Herbert Lom film versions, plus a big chunk of the original novel, and mix them together to make this story. I think this would have made a good film version(it's about time we get a phantom who goes back to his Gothic horror roots). Like in the original novel Christine is blonde, but to me she seems more inteligent, Raoul, who is less whiny and more likable in this, still has an older brother named Philippe, but he is warm hearted not cold and approves of Raoul and Christine's relationship(actually Raoul and Philippe act like Anitole and Raoul from the Claude Rains film, but I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing), Erik is still a walking Corpse and crazy( although in this I'm surprised Erik didn't overdose on those crazy pills he was taking, because he is NUTS!!! in this, but I though that was cool), the Persian is in this too but it seems Erik must of never done him those small favors that made them friends like in Leroux. The Lair was cool, it's more like Herbert Lom's Phantom's Lair. My favorite scene was when Erik and Christine are having wine at the table in front of the fireplace, and Christine asks to leave, but Erik ignores her ranting on about something, and she asks again and Erik gets frustrated and says something like "Don't you understand, YOU CAN NEVER LEAVE!" and breaks his wine glass, but then he's full of guilt for what he's doing and puts his head in his hands. Also the Unmasking scene was great, if they ever make a film version accurate to Leroux they should film the unmasking the way it's described in this book. I thought the mask was cool(described as being half the mask of comedy and half the mask of tragedy and white), also the idea of iris and pupil-less glow-in-the-dark eyeballs is a cool one, but not very realistic.
About Erik lusting after Christine in this and not Leroux, that's not true. In Leroux Erik lusted after Christine (he is described by Christine as looking at her in a strange way that made her fear he would rape her) and only wanted to marry her so he could be considered normal, he didn't actually LOVE her till the end when he is redeemed by her. Also about Leroux's Erik not killing women, this is also not true. In Leroux, it is never said, but implied that Christine isn't the first woman Erik has abducted, but she is the first to leave the unmasking alive. The only reason Erik lets her live is because she pretended to love him and he believed her. I thought this version was very good, it was action-packed and entertaining, a good read. I first read this book when I was 5, or 6(maybe 7), but I didn't understand it and so I looked it up when I was 17 and bought it for nostalgia's sake and read it. The book is pretty much Leroux, but action packed, especially toward the end. This book keeps Erik a madman to the end and doesn't redeem him, although I did feel bad for him at the end, but I really don't mind that, if I did I wouldn't have liked the Chaney version. If your a phan of the Horror side of Phantom(because the original novel is a Horror/Mystery novel) and the early philms then you might enjoy this, but if you really only like the Lloyd Webber musical and only pretend to like Leroux than this book is probably not for you.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
