QUICK TAKE: This Philips Avent monitor has a lot of nice features, design and functionality (as discussed toward the end of this review). But at two to three times the cost of other audio monitors, the added features don't add enough value to earn a recommendation. And even setting aside price, the very low volume on the parent unit limits the usability and versatility of this product for general use.
The biggest issue is that the volume on the parent unit, even when set to the maximum (and with the baby unit sensitivity at maximum), isn't loud enough for everyday situations. For example, with the parent unit five feet away while feeding a not-very-noisy two year old. And so forget about the flexibility (which other monitors have) to turn it up loud enough to hear a child crying while you're in the shower, or during even a quiet-ish get-together. To be really useful, a monitor should go from very quiet to very loud, with lots of steps in between. But unless you keep it next to you and are in a quiet room, the Philips Avent is just not loud enough.
If you only want a night-time monitor, or otherwise always keep it close to you in a quiet situation, this works well. Also, if you have a toddler, who needs less frequent monitoring and can make herself heard when needed, this may work. (Though at the right price the
Philips Avent Basic Baby Monitor w/ DECT Technology, without the temperature feature, may be the way to go.) But as a real-life, wide-range-of-situations monitor - this Philips Avent doesn't make the grade.
Another issue is the thermometer, which is not very useful for two reasons: First, it always reads 5-7 degrees high, which is at a minimum annoying, and also hard to explain to a babysitter, and can run into the pre-set limits to the temperature range alarm feature. Second, the temperature reading unit is on the back of the monitor. That of course assumes you want to measure the temperature in the same place the monitor is - but depending on the your setup, that is often not the case. The temperature on a high shelf five feet from the baby (where you want to put a monitor) might be very different from the temperature where the baby is. If they really want to offer this feature, it should be accurate and ideally use a separate unit for reading the temperature (and humidity, as on their top-end monitor). (We use the
Oregon Scientific BAR638HGA Weather Forecaster with Temperature & Humidity, it works well.)
That being said, there are lots of things to like about this monitor:
+ It uses DECT technology to transmit, which is a secure, static free digital technology with great sound quality, not robotic like some digital audio. (The best new cordless phones use this, too.) It operates at 1.9Ghz, so it won't conflict with anything in your house. It connects well and stays connected (though we don't use it over long distances).
+ The ability to adjust, from the parent unit, the sensitivity of what sound gets picked up in the baby's room is a very nice feature.
+ The parent and baby units are smaller (and more attractive) than you'd guess from the photo. The parent unit is 2+" wide by 4" high by 1+" deep.
+ The battery life on the parent unit seems very long.
+ The nightlight is appropriately dim for a baby's room, maybe the first time I've seen one that wasn't too bright.
+ The music on the baby unit is the first I've heard that I like, though the fact that you can't turn it on and off from the parent unit limits its usefulness.
+ The ability to talk from the parent unit to the baby unit is a nice feature, both to talk among parents and to let a toddler know you're on the way.
There are also some negatives. In addition to the major issues with the volume and the temperature, and not being able to control the music from the parent unit: The power LED on the front of the baby unit is too bright. (I'm getting a lot of use out of that roll of white electrical tape.) It's lame that the power adapters can't handle 230 volts (as well as the US 115V), it limits this monitor's usefulness as a travel monitor. And the menu system is a little cumbersome.
I can definitely understand the issues people have with the screen. It's really hard to read. Luckily we just don't use it much, since the temperature readout isn't useful, so it hasn't been an issue for us except when using the menu system for the controls.
It is important to fully charge and discharge the NiMH (nickel metal-hydride) batteries the first couple times you use it.
As far as alternatives, I've used and reviewed several other audio and video monitors, only one of which I'd recommend - the
Summer Infant Best View Color Video Monitor. There are two others that seem to get good reviews, and may be next on my list to try: For an audio-only monitor, the
Safety 1st High-Def Digital Monitor. Or, if you're going to pay $100 plus (or give a gift), a better option might be to jump to a video monitor, like the Summer Infant model above or the
Safety 1st High-Def Digital Video Monitor. Video monitors turn out to be more useful than most people would think.
UPDATE (September 2009): Having used this more has confirmed my sense that it is not a monitor I'd really recommend.
SCREEN: The screen really is very poorly designed and hard to read.
BEEPING NOISES: I just don't understand why they thought it was a good idea to make it beep when you adjust the volume. (Maybe because the screen is so hard to read?) When you hear a child at night and want to turn the volume down to minimize the number of people who are disturbed, it beeps! That's ridiculous.
INFLEXIBLE ADAPTERS: This is a product that really ought to have a power adapter that can handle international voltages.
FEATURES NOT USEFUL: We've never used any of the sounds, lights, alarms, etc. The controls and features don't make them very useful. As noted, the temperature feature could be very useful, if it actually worked properly.