Most Helpful Customer Reviews
175 of 185 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Slower Shaving than my old Norelco!, October 30, 2005
This review is from: Philips Norelco 9170XLCC Smart Touch XL Shaver (Health and Beauty)
I have been a long time Norelco shaver user. When it was time to buy a new set of Series 7 Lift-and-Cut heads for my old Norelco 6885XL razor, I decided to get the new 9170XLCC razor. Big Mistake! The new 3-ring Smart Touch heads are not as good as the old reliable Lift-and-Cut heads.
Why you say? To make the head look like it has more surface area and thus should cut faster, the Norelo engineers reduced the cutting area of the fastest, outer, ring, to squeeze in the two inner, but slower surface speed, rings. In fact the outer ring cutting blades are only 1.00 mm wide as opposted the the 1.75 mm width cutter width in the series 7 Lift-and-Cut heads. The added inner rings actually cause pulling of the beard hairs if you try to shave at the same speed you did with the older models.
By the Way, the so-called cleaning system is a big bother and not worth the extra cost. You can rinse the 9170XL under the faucet just like the older XL models. In fact, you HAVE TO rinse it because of the sticky mess the cleaning system leaves in the razor after "cleaning."
The bottom line: In a failed attempt to make a quieter, faster, shaving system, Norelco actually made it WORSE than earlier lift-and-cut models. Then to top that off, changed the drive pin design so that one can NOT use the superior heads. Do not waste your hard-earned cash on this sub-par Norelco product.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
69 of 70 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Meh ... it's o.k. but my older one was better, October 14, 2005
This review is from: Philips Norelco 9170XLCC Smart Touch XL Shaver (Health and Beauty)
I had a ten year old norelco advantage razor which is essentially the same configuration but just one cutting ring on each of the 3 heads as opposed to the three that come with this one. I got a better and more comfortable shave with my older norelco than with this one. This shaver still works well and if you're switching from something else these are the way to go but I'd buy an older, less expensive model as this one is not better than my older version. The cleaning system is a gimmicky waste as all you need to do is open the head and rinse it out for 3 seconds (unless you consider that too much work). End result, find the cheapest norelco razor you can and you'll be just as happy.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
32 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not all it's hyped to be, expect more for the price, May 14, 2006
This review is from: Philips Norelco 9170XLCC Smart Touch XL Shaver (Health and Beauty)
I purchased the Norelco 9170 for the following reasons:
1. Three rows of cutting blades to shave faster
2. 90 minutes of shave time per charge
3. A timer that shows how much time is actually remaining versus other models that just tell you the battery is getting low.
4. Easy to clean.
In reality, it does not shave faster than my old Norelco, nor does it shave closer than the old one. The 90 minutes of shave time? The first time I charged it up before the first use, it charged to 85 minutes. The second charge went to 80. I'm now on the third charge and it's down to 78 minutes. I also noticed that as the battery runs down under 20 minutes of shave time, 10 minutes mysteriously drop off so in reality you get less time than what the full charge shows.
It is, however, easy to clean and more quiet than my Quadra. That's the only advantage. I wish I hadn't wasted my money on this model and had purchased a less expensive model. The jet clean system just wastes space in my bathroom.
Overall, I'm rather disappointed at the product I got, especially for the price paid.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|