| Brand Name: | Philips |
| Color Name: | silver |
| Special Features: | Includes Emerson EAN-3000 power amplifier normally not included with this item |
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
59 of 61 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great product. It srprised me,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Philips SDV2940/27 UHF Digital and Analog Indoor/Outdoor TV Antenna (Electronics)
I tried SDV2750/27 first after read some recommendation. It worked. I did get a lot more channels. But, I didn't get the VHF channel as it advertised, and some channels are not stable. Then I tried this SDV2940/27. It is much, much better. I even get more channels. I was not a believer of amplified antenna before since I thought it aplify noise as well as signals. I had not expected it to works so well. It really surprised me. I live in down town San Jose, the the antenna find about 50 channels. 90% of them are very clear like using the cable TV. Many of them have clear 6-channel suround sound. It really worth it.
Amazon is great. I haven't got any hassel in returning the first SDV2750/27 antenna.
56 of 64 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Rabbit Ears vs. Philips sdv2940 antenna,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Philips SDV2940/27 UHF Digital and Analog Indoor/Outdoor TV Antenna (Electronics)
I compared the Philips sdv2940 antenna to a standard "rabbit ears" antenna (made by RCA purchased at Walmart, $10).
I live on the bottom of a hill on the wrong side from the TV towers. I have very sketchy TV signals which are very sensitive to the orientation of the antenna. The reception with the this antenna was NOT noticably better than using rabbit ears. I tested the signal strength through a TV tuner card in my computer. Most of the channels had very similar signal strength. The rabbit ears picked up a couple channels that the Philips antenna didn't and vica versa. There was no clear winner between the two as far as reception goes. Also the Philips antenna has to use the included powered amplifier or you get no signal at all. That said there are some compelling reasons to use the Philips antenna. Pros: - compact design; not gangly like rabbit ears - can be mounted on a variety of surfaces, such on the wall or in a window frame or a pole, using the included mounting hardware - can be mounted outside Cons: - no better reception than rabbit ears - costs 3x as much as rabbit ears - Must use the included inline amplifier to get any signal which requires power. This can be installed right before your TV so it isn't too much of a hassle. Summary: Don't expect improved reception, but it is a much more compact, aesthetic and versatile way to get the same signal you can from rabbit ears.
30 of 34 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Good indoor reception despite the indirect signals,
By T. Sun "Harry" (New York, NY, USA) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Philips SDV2940/27 UHF Digital and Analog Indoor/Outdoor TV Antenna (Electronics)
I use this as an indoor antenna. My living room is not facing the TV broadcast signal directly. Without the amplifier, the signals are too weak. But with amplifier, the HD channels are as clear as you can get from the Cable.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Search Customer Discussions
|
|