-- "Philosophy and Literature"
-- "Philosophy and Literature"
"[Danto is] a fluent writer and cogent theoretician... A coherent treatise both accessible to critically aware general readers and of value to students and scholars of philosophy and art." -- Library Journal
"Danto's view is an important corrective to naive formalism as well as to the recent 'institutional analysis of art'.... The magnitude of the issues Mr. Danto's book raises is a mark of the book's importance." -- The New York Times Book Review
"Danto's critical pieces -- witty and urbane essays -- are uniformly a joy to read." -- The Journal of Philosophy
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
What came first, Arthur Danto ideas or the artist's work?,
By David Dalessandro (NY, NY) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art (Paperback)
Arthur Danto raises many interesting points to help understand art today. In many cases his ideas are very insightful. It made me wonder about what came first, Danto's ideas, or the artist's ideas as revealed in their work?
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|