Most Helpful Customer Reviews
34 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, December 20, 2002
This review is from: Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale: Contemporary Theories in Quantum Gravity (Paperback)
Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale: Contemporary theories in quantum gravity edited by Craig Callender and Nick Huggett is a book the gives the reader accessible introductions to the main and sometimes lesser known insight to quantum gravity. This book was a challenge to read, yes, I must admit. But, that being said, I must say that it helped explain one of the greatest challenges in fundamental physics. How to come up with a plausible theory of quantum gravity out of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Yes, that all encompassing theory of everything aka quantum gravity. Space, time and matter all rolled into one grand theory. The so called problem of time in canonical quantum gravity, black hole thermodynamics and the relationship between the intrepretation of quantum theory and quantum gravity. This book is divided into five parts, each of these parts has abstracts written to coorespond to the question at hand in these parts as chapters. These parts are as follows: Part I: Theories of Quantum Garavity and their Philosophical Dimensions Part II: Strings Part III: Topological Quantum Field Theory Part IV: Quantum Gravity and the Interpretation of General Relativity Part V: Quantum Gravity and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics This book not only looks at the physics to these, but also, looks at the philosophy that is concerned with fundamental questions regarding the nature of space, time, and matter. Seventeen authors give this book its body and soul for explaination as to how these fit together. What I particularly liked was the three chapters in "Strings" with "Reflections of the fate of spacetime by Edward Witten, A philosopher looks at string theory by Robert Weingard, and Black holes, dumb holes, and entropy by william G.Unruh. This book isn't for everyone, but should be essential reading for anyone interested in the profound implications of trying to marry the two most important theories in physics. And that's the large and the small of it in a nutshell. But there is also a more positive reason for the connection between quantum gravity and the philosophy: many of these issues arising in quantum gravity are genuinely philosophical in nature. How should we understand general relativity's general covariance... is it a significant physical principle,or is it merely a question about language with which one writes an equation? What is the nature of time and change? Canthere be a theory of the universe's boundry conditions? These are but a few of the questions asked and the explainations of the answers are trying to be resolved. All, in all, this is a very good read and it will definately tax your brain.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good Variety of Approaches and Accessibility, May 10, 2005
This review is from: Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale: Contemporary Theories in Quantum Gravity (Paperback)
I am one who had trouble with college physics, but continued to keep up with it, first through "Scientific American" and then through the various popularizations of the 1990s. I would not consider this volume to be a "popularization" by any means... it may be introductory but sophisticated. Nonetheless, by reading and rereading the contributions of the many authors, I learned a great deal about general covariance and the quantum gravity formulation problem (perhaps just enough to be considered ignorant). I found Rovelli's contribution (walking through the history of fields, relationism and quanta) to be especially valuable to someone at my (college-casual) level, and I also enjoyed Joy Christian's essay. I cannot pretend to follow all the math, and so for me the "philosophy" half of the title was the more important. I will say that prior understanding of the "Hole Argument" would have been useful, considering its importance in general covariance... this volume touches upon it in several places but none in a way that I considered accessible to a generally educated reader. Perhaps I will just have to try harder.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Physical reality of space and time, May 29, 2009
This review is from: Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale: Contemporary Theories in Quantum Gravity (Paperback)
This book, edited by a physicist and a philosopher is described in five sections. The first section gives an introduction to the theories presented in the rest of four sections that deals with the unification of quantum physics and general relativity, i.e., quantization of spacetime. The second section reviews string theory that includes a chapter from the leading string theorist Ed Witten, and the third section discusses the advantages of topological quantum field theory (TQFT) in spacetime quantization. The last two chapters discuss quantum gravity by either using general relativity (minimizing quantum effects) or quantum physics (minimizing relativistic effects). Contributions from well known physicists like Roger Penrose, Carlo Rovelli, and William Unruh are included in this book. There are numerous quantum gravity theories, and one of the features of these theories is that they are highly mathematical, and largely unsupported by experimental evidence. The author's claim that this book is written for a general reader; this is not true because you need to know significant amount of physics and mathematics to clearly understand this book. Philosophical discussion of quantized spacetime and its relevance to physical reality is minimal. You will be disappointed if you are reading this book purely from philosophical interest.
The relevance of spacetime quantization in relation to existence and reality is summarized as follows: Newtonian mechanics, relativistic physics, and quantum mechanics provide us physical laws that are used to describe existence and physical reality. Newtonian physics is sufficient to describe reality of our normal daily experiences in this world. At the level of atomic and subatomic particles, the reality is described by the laws of quantum physics; the application of Newtonian physics under these circumstances is very limited. At the cosmic level, the physical reality of stars, galaxies, and black holes are described by the theory of relativity. At low velocities (or momentum), relativistic physics is simplified and Newtonian physics becomes relevant; but at high velocities (or momentum), effects of relativity dominate and spacetime gets distorted, and Newtonian physics is no longer applicable. Hence to explain existence and physical reality one needs unified laws of physics that can explain all phenomenon at all sizes; let it be momentum of an electron or an automobile or a galaxy.
Does spacetime exist in quantized state? If yes, then the energy-momentum will not be conserved or the superluminal (faster than speed of light) signaling will be allowed in quantum spacetime. How do we combine the quantum theory and relativistic physics into one theory that treats matter fields governed by quantum physics evolving on a curved spacetime that is governed by the theory of relativity? The main quantum gravity theories are; canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory. Alternative theories are twister theory, holographic hypothesis, non-commutative geometry, topological quantum field theory, and many others explore different avenues to the unification of spacetime. General relativity is a theory of gravity, hence a theory of space and time. Application of quantum physics into the concept of spacetime doesn't have to be like converting continuity to discreteness, the conception space and time could be still be held at the most fundamental level. One of the fundamental issues is that there are no phenomenon that is a result of interplay between general relativity and quantum physics. The lack of empirical data originates from a dimensional argument. The quantum scales; Planck's length, Planck's mass, Planck's time are extremely small and Plank's energy is extremely large. The theory of blackbody radiation gave the first indication that the field such as electromagnetic fields is quantized. Later developments showed that except gravity, all other three forces are unified in quantum field models. The values of these fields consequently are subjected to Heisenberg uncertainty which means that exact strengths at any given point are not specifiable. Hence any quantum theoretical description of gravity must provide for uncertainty in the value of gravity. One of the basic problems is that theory of relativity, the principle of equivalence, the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass regard classical gravity as a theory of spacetime geometry. Quantum field treatment of a point results in quantization and no definable point is possible. If we use a massive object, the position is measurable with accuracy with respect to the classical background but it also amounts increasing gravitational charge and hence it interacts with the quantum gravitational background one is trying to measure. Thus the classical gravitational observables are diffeomorphism-invariant, which means we can not isolate a system gravitationally, and all matter and reference objects must be included in the description and these raise profound difficulties at the quantum level. One way to quantify the effects of gravity at a point is to make use of the relational properties but the downside of that is it fails to capture all observable gravitational phenomenons. In canonical quantum gravity the obvious part is the difficulty in finding any observable. The one that is expected to be found is highly non-local observable, yet the quantum gravity at a point corresponds to Planck's length. The second problem is the problem of time in quantum gravity. The fact that there is no definite quantum field strength at a point suggests that there is no adequate definition of local energy density.
The applications of quantum physics to field theory, the conventional quantum field theory, rely on the existence of stage or fixed non-dynamical background metric structure, the Minkowski metric and this can not be replaced with quantum fields. Hence one way is to disvalue general relativity concepts and define gravitational field (spacetime curvature) to include Minkowski metric and the quantum fluctuations. Quantize only the fluctuations and hope to recover general relativity later; this approach has been used in perturbative string theory. The second approach is to find a theory that does not use background space. Each theory has its advantages and disadvantages but none comes close to the description of reality.
1. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science
2. Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics
3. What Is Life?: with "Mind and Matter" and "Autobiographical Sketches"
4. The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism (25th Anniversary Edition)
5. Niels Bohr's Times,: In Physics, Philosophy, and Polity
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
