Qty:1
$10.90 + $4.99 shipping
In Stock. Sold by WCCorp

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Art Nudes - Playing Cards

by Piatnik
4 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: $10.90 + $4.99 shipping
Only 2 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by WCCorp.
3 new from $10.90

Games we love
$10.90 + $4.99 shipping Only 2 left in stock. Ships from and sold by WCCorp.


Product Description

Deluxe single deck playing cards by Piatnik. Includes one 52-card deck. Made in Austria. All Piatnik Playing Cards come in sturdy, beautifully made boxes with illustrations that match the specific Piatnik Playing Card design theme you choose. Piatnik has been known for the highest quality playing cards around for more than 100 years.


Product Details

  • Product Dimensions: 5.2 x 3.9 x 0.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 3.5 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • ASIN: B0002HL6QI
  • Item model number: 1129
  • Manufacturer recommended age: 13 years and up
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #787,476 in Toys & Games (See Top 100 in Toys & Games)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)

Customer Reviews

5 star
0%
4 star
100%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
This is a beautiful collection of classical and some modern fine art nudes. It's a very classy take of the "pinup playing cards" concept, and a great conversation starter. My only dissatisfaction is that of being an artist, in that the color or reproductions on some of the images, such as "La Source" by Ingres, aka 9 of Spades, is poor, inconsistent, and dissatisfying to an admirer of the piece. Again, this issue, and perhaps with some personal disagreement with the way some paintings were cropped, takes away nothing from their use as a deck of cards or "Know Your Nude" flashcard set, and rather a desire that the source images had been selected or processed with more care.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse