- Platform: Windows Vista / XP
- Media: CD-ROM
- Item Quantity: 1
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
26 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Pretty Good Software - Fast Learning Curve,
By Angie's Husband (Pacific Northwest) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Pinnacle Studio HD V14 [OLD VERSION] (CD-ROM)
What I think sets this software apart from others, is how easy it is to use. Just spending a few minutes watching their FREE online tutorials and you are up and running in no time at all. Really, the video tutorials are quite nicely done, and sure beat having to read pages of a help manual.
I'll also point out that their "stabilize" effect to remove camera share is AMAZING (on paper). However, when it comes to delivering a final product, it really falls short. The video ends up highly degraded, and is not tolerable for mastering to a DVD. And if there is motion in addition to camera shake, then just forget about it! Maybe this effect is ok for a youTube video, but most definitely not a 480i DVD. The menu functionality is a bit gimped in this version. Meaning, you cannot have a title page, which leads into different sub menus (only one menu page is supported in the Studio HD version). I will also say that I've had a few issues with the thing crashing when trying to apply some of the audio effects, but not sure if that is the software's fault or not. Other than that, the editing experience has been pretty good. Lastly, I will say that the burning process is PAINFUL. I mean like really really bad. Get ready to make a bunch of DVD coasters while you hunt for solutions to your problem. The best advice I got was to use the software to create an .ISO file (image), and then use a different program (like the one that came with your computer) to burn that .ISO image to DVD.
24 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Less buggy than the competition,
By
This review is from: Pinnacle Studio HD V14 [OLD VERSION] (CD-ROM)
I recently made a 40 minute wedding video for my cousin with Studio HD. I bought the software in desperation after having miserable experiences with Cyberlink PowerDirector and Corel VideoStudio Pro X2. Both PowerDirector and VideoStudio crashed repeatedly and created other quality problems with sound and audio. It was quite frustrating, because I was working on a newly bought computer that should have had more than enough horsepower.
Studio HD was much more stable. The interface was somewhat quirky, but I figured it out without too much trouble. The quality of the final DVD was very good. I did run into major stability issues towards the end, when my project had gotten large. I think I know the solution now: break a longer project into pieces; work on each piece as a separate project and output it as a video file; then assemble the video files into a final project for burning to DVD.
33 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Comprehensive Review of the top 7 video editing software titles,
By
This review is from: Pinnacle Studio HD V14 [OLD VERSION] (CD-ROM)
Sorry about the formatting, Amazon is removing all my spaces when I publish even though it looks fine in the editor.
Computer Specs: Intel Core2 Duo @ 1.86 GHz 2 GB RAM 256 MB Video 32 bit Windows Vista My test: Added 2 videos. Added image stabilization to one 3D transition between them. Rendered the project. AVCHD in and MPG2 out (both in full HD, 1920*1440, Dolby 5.1 if available) Video length 4 minutes and 20 seconds. Overall Review: ***** Corel Video Studio Pro X3 ***** Cyberlink PowerDirector 8 *** Sony Vegas Movie Studio Pro Plus 9 **1/2 Adobe Premiere Elements 8 ** Magix Edit Pro 15 * Roxio Creator 2010 * Pinnacle Studio Ultimate 14 Package Options: My reviews are against the top versions of each product line. You will find that most of the differences between the top versions and the base are Blu-ray export options, and some add some extra sound options. See for yourself the option that suits you at the manufacturer's website in their respective product comparison guides. Windows 7: All seemed to work for me in windows 7, 64 bit with 4 GB RAM. I didn't do any tests with it b/c I wanted to use an older machine that would come closer to representing the average computer. This includes Roxio 2009, but not 2010 for reasons stated below. Final Opinion: If you want something super easy to use, then I would go with Cyberlink PowerDirector 8. If you want something with a bit more power that you can grow into, I would go with Corel Video Studio Pro X3. Sony Vegas Movie Studio Pro plus 9 may very well be good, but I see no reason to purchase it with the power of the Corel package. If you are a masochist, go with Adobe, Magix, Roxio, or Pinnacle. DETAILS: Adobe Premiere Elements 8 65 min render time Pros: You can search effects Layout was good but not great Interface was pretty straightforward Cons: Virtually locked my system Slow and temporarily froze frequently Output menu was cumbersome Corel Video Studio Pro X3 19 min render time Pros: Great Output menu Very fast Easy to use user interface Proxy editing* Autofit for timeline Cons: No search function for effects Cyberlink PowerDirector 8 30 min render time Pros: Output menu was nice Very nice and easy to use layout Cons: No Blu-ray output Magix Edit Pro 15 41 min Render time Pros: Simple Cons: Poor user interface Oversimplified (Too simple I think for most people) Very Cumbersome to use and add effects Output options were confusing and cumbersome Extremely limited options for PC output (which is what many will be doing) A couple of lock ups Pinnacle Studio Ultimate 14 Pros: Nice little finished project to see what can be done Nice interface for editing Cons: ONLY SOFTWARE that I was not able to import a video Locked up my system many times and left errant process running at 80% CPU Took 50 seconds just to load the import video TAB When I selected videos to import and hit start import, absolutely nothing happened Tried one of their movies and went to help to find stabilization and it crashed on me b/c I didn't have enough memory No Blu-ray output Cons on install on windows 7 computer: Failure on export of file on all formats I actually tried Pinnacle about 10 years ago and had absolutely nothing but problems. Spent many days downloading patches just to get it to work. Then, like a moron, I did an entire project and when I went to burn it, the burn failed every time. I see a decade later, I still can't export a file. Roxio Creator 2010 Pros: ----- Cons: They don't allow a trial download. I contacted them asking them if I could download a trial and even noted that I was a current customer. I personally like the 2009 Roxio. It was a nice "all-purpose" program. They told me that I had to buy it. I was offered a money back guarantee, but to do so, I had to send in a letter of destruction. This is way too much effort on my end to see if your software works for me. I find it ridiculous in this day and age that you can't have a trial version of something, especially when EVERY ONE of your competitors does. In addition, this is how they were treating an existing customer! You throw in all the compatibility issues that can occur in software in general and video software in particular, and that leaves me to think they have nothing to hide. As icing on the cake, the following sentence was in their reply. "Creator 2010 does support AVCHD software and hasn't been know to have any issues thus far!" I replied to them about this OUTRIGHT LIE! First, you can read the compatibility issues on Amazon. Second, as a person that writes programs, there is no such thing as bug free software, especially video editing software. Sony Vegas Movie Studio Pro Plus 9 14 minute render time (NO ANTI-SHAKE IN RENDER, see below) Pros: Computer stayed pretty responsive during render Savable packages of effects How to guide is nice Cons: Couldn't search effects Very, very cumbersome to use Couldn't find stabilization The render time approximation stayed at around 1 minute or 2 left the entire time Here is my issue with Sony Vegas. I have compared its features with many of the other programs and they are all very similar. Now, when compared with Corel Video Studio Pro X3 and Cyberlink PowerDirector, they are virtually identical. I personally think Sony leaves their software cumbersome so that it "looks/seems" more powerful. I was definitely most disappointed in this product because it was the one that I was looking the most forward to using. When I say that it is cumbersome to use, it doesn't mean that it can't be used. Let me give an example. I am a programmer, and in something like excel, I like the ability to write my own code to create functions and tools that it doesn't offer or to tweak ones that it does. HOWEVER, when I want to enter numbers in boxes, I just want to enter numbers in boxes. I don't want to click in a box, go to a menu or right click, select some gadget and then enter a number. It is ok for complicated things to be complicated, but simple things should not only be simple, but also INTUITIVE. The main thing that I saw that you could do in Sony Vegas that you couldn't do in the others is change your transitions (both audio and video) ramp as far as how quickly they come in and go out. I am not talking about changing the time, but how your out video accelerates out and how you in video accelerates in during that time. It is a cool feature, but something that 99% of people will only not use, but won't care about either. Another thing, the image stabilizer should be easy to do, and it may be. However, I did a search in help for stabilize, stabilizer, sta, shake, anti, etc. and could not find out how to do this very simple thing. This worries me greatly that if this isn't readily available in the help docs, then much of the other stuff probably isn't either. *A note on proxy editing. Proxy editing is basically you working on a very low def version of your file, but when it comes time to actually render your output, the original file is used. Some view this as a crutch because they say you should be able to optimize the software to work with the high def video. My opinion is that if I can work faster, then I will work faster. Who cares what my resolution is while I am editing. If you have the fastest software out there for HD, and you can do your edits in very low def and it is even faster still, then why would you not want that?
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|