Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.

Buy Used
$4.25
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: The item shows wear from consistent use, but it remains in good condition and works perfectly. All pages and cover are intact (including the dust cover, if applicable). Spine may show signs of wear. Pages may include limited notes and highlighting. May include "From the library of" labels.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Plants of Colonial Williamsburg: How to Identify 200 of Colonial America's Flowers, Herbs, and Trees Paperback – June 1, 1979

5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Price
New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$1.49 $0.01

Creativebug
Get unlimited access to over 700 online art and craft classes for only $4.95 per month! > Start Free Trial
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE


Product Details

  • Paperback: 193 pages
  • Publisher: Colonial Williamsburg Foundation (June 1, 1979)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0879350423
  • ISBN-13: 978-0879350420
  • Product Dimensions: 0.5 x 4.5 x 8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #499,029 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Love the book, no problems with order
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse