Poles and Jews: A Failed Brotherhood (Tauber Institute Series for the Study of European Jewry) [Paperback]

Magdalena Opalski (Author), Israel Bartal (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: December 15, 1992 | Series: Tauber Institute Series for the Study of European Jewry (Book 13)

Examines Polish and Jewish perceptions of the rapprochement culminating in Polish national insurrection against Czarist Russia in 1863.

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

This volume focuses on a lesser-known episode in the stormy history of Polish-Jewish relations, a brief period of rapprochement in the 1860s. Opalski, a professor of East European studies at Carleton University (in Ottawa), and Bartal, a professor of modern Jewish history at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, bring an unusual perspective to the subject, studying the Polish and Jewish literature of the period to understand "the myth of Polish-Jewish brotherhood during the last Polish uprising against Russia." Polish Jews were eager participants in the anti-Russian nationalist wave of 1861-1862, a phenomenon that "gave birth to a peculiar ritual of fraternizing with the Jews." Although the authors paint the overall struggle of Poland for independence, too often the specific historical incidents under discussion are unknown to all but students of Polish history. Opalski and Bartal are much better at elucidating the broad social currents that allowed the Jews to be linked unfavorably in the Polish imagination with the rising tide of capitalism. The book is useful as a survey of an enormous range of 19th-century Polish and Jewish literature, and as an introduction to Polish-Jewish relations before the Holocaust, but the writing is dry and academic.
Copyright 1992 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From the Publisher

6 x 9 trim. LC 92-53865

Product Details

• Paperback: 205 pages
• Publisher: Brandeis; 1st edition (December 15, 1992)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0874516021
• ISBN-13: 978-0874516029
• Product Dimensions: 9 x 5.9 x 0.6 inches
• Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,073,707 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

3 of 6 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Polish-Jewish Relations in the Late 19th Century, September 29, 2006

By 

Jan Peczkis "Scholar and Thinker" (Chicago IL, USA) - See all my reviews
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)   

This review is from: Poles and Jews: A Failed Brotherhood (Tauber Institute Series for the Study of European Jewry) (Paperback)

This book surveys the attitudes of Jews and Poles to each other during the second half of the 19th century, doing so through their respective bodies of literature. Consider this backdrop: "Generally speaking, the 1850's were marked by a sense of growing economic competition between Poles and Jews." (p. 16).

Opalski and Bartal summarize Jewish attitudes towards the 1863 Polish insurrection against Russian rule as follows: "In general, pro-Polish attitudes among the Jews were most pronounced in Warsaw (where the acculturation process was most advanced) and the neighboring provinces. The tradition of loyalty to the Crown prevailed in the eastern provinces of Poland's Russian partition, whose economic backwardness preserved traditional barriers intact...the conservative, religious masses rarely identified with Polish objectives." (pp. 2-4). Those "conservative, religious masses', of course, comprised the overwhelming majority of Polish Jews. In other contexts, the loyalty of wealthy Jewish capitalists to the Polish cause was questioned (p. 68). The Jewish maskilim (the enlightened) were, for the most part, also not supportive of the Polish cause (p. 83).

For a time, the 1863 insurrection did tend to bring Poles and Jews closer together. Opalski and Bartal provide some detail of the Jewish manifestations of support for the cause of Poland's independence. There were, for example, patriotic songs sung in churches and synagogues, common singing of songs, exchange of gifts between houses of prayer, and joint mourning for the loss of Poland's independence. (p. 42). Some Jewish writers juxtaposed the historical experiences of the then-recent Poles with those of the ancient Jews (pp. 51-52). Thus, Poland became Zion, and the Polish fighters were identified with the Maccabees. The fall of insurrectionary Warsaw was compared to the fall of Jerusalem, and the consequences of the 1863-1864 defeat were mapped to the Babylonian captivity and the destruction of the temple.

After the failed 1863 insurrection, Poles and Jews drifted further apart. Jewish prejudices against Poles were just as real as Polish prejudices against Jews. An example of the former is the following: "The Polish nobleman, referred to as porets in Hebrew and Yiddish texts, combined in the Jewish mind cruelty, capriciousness, violence, and rashness." (p. 149). Such prejudices sometimes divided the generations: "Accordingly, Smolenskin's Hersh Holdheim argues bitterly with his son, trying to depreciate the Poles and their culture and values in the young man's eyes." (p. 80).

To what extent did the Jews become part of the fabric of Poland? "This selective and incomplete Jewish acculturation, which many Polish writers saw as dual loyalty or even treason, was, in fact, a common aspect of nineteenth-century Jewish life." (p. 35). Moreover, in the 19th (and 20th) centuries, Polish nationalists increasingly questioned the genuineness of much of what did pass for Jewish loyalty to Poland. It is ironic that some 19th century Jews had voiced comparable sentiments, doing so even earlier: "It should be stressed that even extreme pro-Polish attitudes of some religious authorities, such as Rabbi Meisels, were interpreted by the Orthodox as a clever strategy to cope with the potentially dangerous Polish patriots rather than as an expression of real political affinity with the Polish cause." (p. 149).

A great deal of recent attention (as by Michael Steinlauf and Jan Thomas Gross) has been devoted to the fact that Poles acquired post-Jewish properties in the wake of the extermination of the Polish Jews during WWII. Some have portrayed this as some type of deep moral issue, and one that furthermore cast the Poles as exploiters and plunderers. It is therefore somewhat ironic that the shoe was first on the other foot some 80 years earlier! One theme of Polish writers, following the failed 1863 insurrection against tsarist Russia, was the circumstances under which Jews had acquired Polish and post-Polish properties. For example: "Maria Rodziewiczowna attributes the sudden prosperity of a Lithuanian shtetl to Jewish trade in the confiscated property of rebels." (p. 128). Furthermore, "The town's Jews hurry to buy cattle confiscated during the brutal pacification of a petty nobleman's village, whose entire population was deported to Siberia. They also take advantage of the political situation to purchase wooden lots from Polish noblemen at low prices." (p. 129).

Let us now consider the late 19th century. The divisive nature of the Litvaks is described as follows: "The harsh anti-Jewish policies in Russia and their consequences--pogroms, impoverishment, and massive dislocation of the Jewish population--affected the Congress Kingdom in yet another way. From the 1880's on, there was a substantial influx of Jews from the Lithuanian, Russian, and Ukrainian provinces of the empire into the Congress Kingdom, the so-called Litvak invasion--which added a new source of Polish-Jewish tensions. The Litvaks, Russian-speaking Jewish immigrants, faced a certain amount of hostility from the local Jews because of cultural differences and economic competition. They also provided a focus for the anti-Jewish views of Polish nationalists, who accused them of being agents of Russification and the driving force behind Jewish political separatism." (pp. 104-105).