The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more



or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) [Paperback]

Robert Spencer
3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (592 customer reviews)

List Price: $19.95
Price: $14.65 & FREE Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $5.30 (27%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it Wednesday, May 22? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $9.99  
Hardcover --  
Paperback $14.65  
Audio, CD $26.96  
Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged $14.95 or Free with Audible 30-day free trial
Image
Save on Popular Books This Summer
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more.

Book Description

August 1, 2005
Islam expert Robert Spencer reveals Islam's ongoing, unshakable quest for global conquest and why the West today faces the same threat as the Crusaders did--and what we can learn from their experience.

Frequently Bought Together

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) + The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran + The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World's Most Intolerant Religion
Price for all three: $44.45

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

Review

"A clarion call for the defense of the West before it is too late." -- Ibn Warraq, author

"A much-needed antidote to the poisonous propaganda that compromises our current battle against jihadist murder." -- Bruce Thornton, historian

"An enormous amount of well-researched material. Throws the ball back into the camp of Arabist historians." -- Walid Phares, terror analyst

"Assails, with much erudition, the taboos imposed by the Politically Correct League." -- Bat Ye’or, historian

"The courageous Robert Spencer busts myths and tells truths about jihadists that no one else will tell." -- Michelle Malkin, bestselling author and columnist

From the Back Cover

Everything (well, almost everything) you know about Islam and the Crusades is wrong because most textbooks and popular history books are written by left-wing academics and Islamic apologists who justify their contemporary political agendas with contrived historical "facts." But fear not: Robert Spencer (author of the bestseller Islam Unveiled) refutes the popular myths in The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades). Spencer reveals facts that you won't be taught in school and will never hear on the evening news, supplies a revealing list of "Books You Must Not Read" (as far as the PC left is concerned), and takes you on a fast-paced politically incorrect tour of Islamic teaching and Crusades history that will give you all the information you need to understand the true nature of the global conflict America faces today.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 270 pages
  • Publisher: Regnery Publishing; Later Printing edition (August 1, 2005)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0895260131
  • ISBN-13: 978-0895260130
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 7.3 x 0.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (592 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #79,074 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

ROBERT SPENCER is the director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and the author of twelve books, including two New York Times bestsellers, The Truth About Muhammad and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) (both Regnery). His latest book is Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam's Obscure Origins (ISI).

Spencer has led seminars on Islam and jihad for the United States Central Command, United States Army Command and General Staff College, the U.S. Army's Asymmetric Warfare Group, the FBI, the Joint Terrorism Task Force, and the U.S. intelligence community.

Spencer is the Associate Director of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI). He is a weekly columnist for FrontPage Magazine and has written eleven monographs and well over three hundred articles about jihad and Islamic terrorism. In addition to the above books, he is the author of Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World's Fastest Growing Faith (Encounter); Onward Muslim Soldiers: How Jihad Still Threatens America and the West (Regnery); Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn't (Regnery), a refutation of moral equivalence and call for all the beneficiaries and heirs of Judeo-Christian Western civilization, whatever their own religious or philosophical perspective may be, to defend it from the global jihad; Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam is Subverting America without Guns or Bombs (Regnery), an expose of how jihadist groups are advancing their agenda in the U.S. today by means other than terrorist attacks; and The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran (Regnery). He is coauthor, with Daniel Ali, of Inside Islam: A Guide for Catholics (Ascension), and editor of the essay collection The Myth of Islamic Tolerance: How Islamic Law Treats Non-Muslims (Prometheus). He is coauthor, with Pamela Geller, of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War On America (Threshold Editions/Simon & Schuster). Spencer's books have been translated into many languages, including Spanish, Italian, Finnish, Korean, and Bahasa Indonesia.

Along with his current weekly columns, for nearly ten years Spencer wrote the weekly Jihad Watch column at Human Events. He has completed a weekly Qur'an commentary at Jihad Watch, Blogging the Qur'an, which has been translated into Czech, Danish, German, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese. He has served as a contributing writer to Steven Emerson's Investigative Project on Terrorism. His articles on Islam and other topics have appeared in the New York Post, the Washington Times, the Dallas Morning News, the New Criterion, the Journal of International Security Affairs, the UK's Guardian, Canada's National Post, Townhall, Middle East Quarterly, WorldNet Daily, First Things, Insight in the News, National Review Online, and many other journals.

Spencer has discussed jihad, Islam, and terrorism at a workshop sponsored by the U.S. State Department and the German Foreign Ministry. He has also appeared on the BBC, ABC News, CNN, FoxNews's O'Reilly Factor, the Sean Hannity Show, the Glenn Beck Show, Fox and Friends, and many other Fox programs, PBS, MSNBC, CNBC, C-Span, France24 and Croatia National Televison (HTV), as well as on numerous radio programs including Bill O'Reilly's Radio Factor, The Laura Ingraham Show, Bill Bennett's Morning in America, Michael Savage's Savage Nation, The Sean Hannity Show, The Alan Colmes Show, The G. Gordon Liddy Show, The Neal Boortz Show, The Michael Medved Show, The Michael Reagan Show, The Rusty Humphries Show, The Larry Elder Show, The Barbara Simpson Show, Vatican Radio, and many others. He has been a featured speaker at Dartmouth College, Stanford University, New York University, Brown University, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the University of Virginia, the College of William and Mary, Washington University of St. Louis, the University of Wisconsin at Madison, the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, and many other colleges and universities.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
549 of 616 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The Comparisons are Glaring September 28, 2006
Format:Paperback
This book obliterates simplistic, politically correct views about Islam. The word-for-word comparisons between the teachings of Muhammed and the teachings of Christianity, Buddhism, and other religions, are stunning. Take, for example, the famous story of Jesus' intervention when a crowd was about to stone an adulterous woman. His words, to let the person "who is without sin cast the first stone", sent the mob retreating in shame. He then told the woman to, "Go and sin no more." As the autor quotes from the Quran, Muhammed was confronted with a similar situation. A pregnant adulterous woman had come to him requesting that he pray with her for forgiveness. He sent her away until the baby was born. When she came back months later, he sent her away until the child was weened. When she came back as directed, he took the child and gave it to one of his men as a gift. Muhammed then ordered the mother buried up to her shoulders and stoned to death. It really is time for media pundits, college professors, and self-serving politicos to stop making shallow moral equivalence statements about Islam, the Quran, and the Crusades. This book needs to be read and studied by those who now are in a position to give away our birthright. It took the ancient Greeks, the Judeo-Christian tradition, the Magna Carta, the U.S. Constitution, and hundreds of years of Western Civilization to produce the most beneficent and free society in history. Here, Muslims and others can practice their beliefs without fear. We must insist that spokesmen and apologists for Islam demand that this "religion of peace" grant its neighbors the same rights the Western democracies have gladly given to them. Read the book. Its an eye-opener.
Was this review helpful to you?
197 of 222 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars worth reading, but check other sources as well. May 12, 2007
By Ambrose
Format:Paperback
I just finished this book, and I think it's worth reading as a balance to a great many works out there which are slanted in the other direction (ie: "Christians bad - Muslims good, yada, yada). I'm not a scholar on any of the subjects Spencer covers here, so I will allow that he might not be 100% right on every point. After reading many of the other reviews here, I'm convinced that many of these folks have not read the book at all. Spencer certainly has serious misgivings about Islam and, yes, I think one could call him "biased" to some extent. But what's wrong with that? I personally don't believe there is any such thing as a completely unbiased scholar, so I just try to get my information from multiple sources (this is the 3rd book on Islam I've read this year). That's why I bought this book - to get another view - one that is not heard much in our ever increasingly PC world. Why do some reviewers have such a problem with that? Some seem to think that only one view is valid (theirs), and that Spencer should not be allowed to enter the debate at all. If you believe some of these reviewers, anyone who says anything positive about this book is just one step away from picking up a sniper rifle and heading over to the nearest mosque. What condescending idiocy is that? I'm not a "hater", or a "bigot" or a "narrow-minded zealot", just a seeker of multiple points of view. That used to be called being "liberal".

I was particularly amused by one typical negative review written by Ms. Martie D. Kelley. It sounds to me that she's more biased than Robert Spencer, just in the other direction. Kelley trumpets her "higher education" and status as a "scholar" holding a BA in Religious Studies (doesn't say from where), but Robert Spencer holds an MA (that's a master's degree, Martie!) in Religious Studies from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and has been researching and writing on the subject of Islamic theology, law, and history for 27 years! So, by any objective standard, Spencer is a scholar, and he deserves to say his piece without being labeled a bigot! If he's wrong about something, then let's hear the counter argument - not dismissive insults. The only bit of evidence Ms. Kelley offers to show that Spencer is wrong is the laughable assertion that, "in the Qur'an it is explicitly stated that it is the duty of Muslims to protect People of the Book (Jews & Christians)" Now why does this tidbit come as no comfort to me? Would Ms. Kelley defend a male chauvinist who says that patriarchy states that it is the duty of every man to "protect" women? I doubt it. If Ms. Kelley had bothered to do more than just "skim through various parts" of Mr. Spencer's book, she would have realized that this inane comment plays right into one of the more salient points Spencer talks about in his section on Dhimma (chapter 4). The Muslim idea of "protection" of non-muslims is a far cry from what most Westerners know as religious tolerance and freedom of worship. It's more like how the Mafia dons used to describe shaking down the store owners in the neighborhood. "We're not taking their money and making them live in abject fear. No, we're just offering these good people 'protection'. There's no injustice going on here". Tell me, Ms. Kelley, just who should the other "people of the Book" be protected from, hmmm? I'm also wondering what kind of comfort and assurance Ms. Kelley would offer to a Hindu, Buddhist or an Animist (or any other person not "of the Book") because as Spencer points out, these people have been regarded as no better than animals by Muslims. How can any intellectually honest person make such excuses for a religious system that claims to be religiously tolerant, yet is so narrowly selective in it's tolerance? It just amazes me how far some "educated" people will go to defend the indefensible. Is Ms. Kelley saying that we need not be concerned about how the other religious groups are treated by Muslims as long as the Christians and Jews are "protected" (whatever that means)???

This book might not be the last word on Islam, but it is worth a read, and I think Spencer is bringing some good points to a very important contemporary debate. I recommend the book but, by all means, keep reading and decide for yourself.
Was this review helpful to you?
2,386 of 2,794 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A crucial and timely analysis. July 30, 2005
Format:Paperback
The cover of this study carries the declaration that the contents refute "popular myths" and reveal "facts" that will not be heard on the news.

From the outset this proves to be very much the case as the reader is taken into a courageous investigation of Islam.

Replete with references as well as quotations and examples direct from former practising, learned Muslims, the claims that Islam is a "peaceful" and "tolerant" religion are examined in considerable depth for a book of this nature.

Many quotes are provided which reveal fundamental differences between the statements made by Jesus Christ and Muhammed. This is done with the declared intent of providing the reader with an opportunity to visualise what is cited as the "fallacy" of those who claim that Islam and Christianity are basically "equal" in their ability to inspire good or evil.

Furthermore, these quotes are provided for the reader to understand that a "distinction" can be drawn between what are described as the "core principles" that guide faithful Muslims and Christians.

Beginning with an examination of the life and character of Muhammed himself, the study proceeds to discuss a plethora of other subjects including the alleged Islamic "oppression" of women, historical revisionism, the Crusades, the purported "dangers" of criticising Islam, "Islamophobia" and "Jihad".

The reader is provided, in no uncertain terms, with a visualisation of what allegedly faces the US, Europe, the West & indeed the International arena, should we fail to come to terms with the consequences of what is described as the "real" message and implications of Islam, which are purportedly being denied the public by the powers that be.

One former Muslim is quoted as saying that the theory and practice of Jihad was "....not concocted in the Pentagon....it was taken from the Koran, the Hadith and Islamic tradition...".

This statement is then elaborated and clarified by stating that it is the "divinely ordained duty" of Muslims to fight in the literal sense until man-made law has been "replaced by God's law". (The latter being described as Sharia and Islamic law).

Further to the subjects already mentioned, the book analyses a series of issues which many readers will find disturbing, such as the investigation of the much-publicised promise of "virgins" in Paradise to Islamic martyrs.

Many concerns are echoed towards the end of this work, including a call for what is described as "responsible reporting" from the media and honesty from law enforcement officials about jihadist attacks in the US. This is made whilst still recognising the need to confront an official fear pertaining to vigilantes who would victimise innocent Muslims should certain information be publicised.

Concern is also expressed with reference to the post September 11th statement by US President Bush who warned the world that "...you are either with the terrorists or you're with us...". The book alleging an official refusal to acknowledge who the terrorists really are and what they are fighting for that has subsequently seen the US administration still counting as friends and allies, many states where jihadist activities are extensive.

Many will perceive this book and it's message to be highly contentious and perhaps even offensive, but I feel that it is required reading at this time, irrespective of the reader's personal views. Thank you.
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent book by a respected scholar
I have been reading the work of Robert Spencer for last several years and I must say he is one of the fearless scholars who write honestly about Islam and the threat it poses to... Read more
Published 1 day ago by Rama Rao
5.0 out of 5 stars Perhaps the best Intro to Islam yet published
Robert Spencer's 'Politically Incorrect Guid to Islam, and the Crusades' is much more than a 'dummies' guide book. Read more
Published 10 days ago by Mark S. Goldberg
1.0 out of 5 stars If you are prejudice and mindless than you and the author have two...
This book was written with pre-conceived ideas and agendas. The prejudice and ignorant masses will eat this up, but any one with an objective and truth seeking mind will realize... Read more
Published 14 days ago by guidedpath55
5.0 out of 5 stars Understand the current news about Islam
This book corrects a lot of misconceptions about early Islam and the Crusades. I have heard so many say that early Islam was very generous to Christians and Jews and the Crusades... Read more
Published 25 days ago by MARY M JOHNSON
5.0 out of 5 stars Nothing more scary that scary non-fiction.
The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam is $9.99 for the kindle. This book was published in 2005. That's before we elected a Muslim president. Read more
Published 1 month ago by Jerry Nowlin
5.0 out of 5 stars the incorrect guide
It should be re named as the correct guide...every school student should be reading this one...a real eye openner and should be spread to all schools in Australia as a wake up... Read more
Published 2 months ago by Trevor Keayes
1.0 out of 5 stars Seek information elsewhere!
Political correctness is a term invented by people (mainly on the extreme right) who can't accept that most scholars disagree with them, whether the subject is Islam, global... Read more
Published 2 months ago by Oivind
5.0 out of 5 stars A well-documented introduction to Islam
I took a graduate level elective in Islam that was very helpful in 1998, and that one-semester class explained Islam to me in an understandable and extremely respectful way, full... Read more
Published 3 months ago by William Bond
3.0 out of 5 stars Politically Incorrect Guilde
Another insite in the Crusades.and the war with Islam. I did not understand about it being politically incorrect, if the author was accurate in his writings.
Published 3 months ago by Dr. Bert O. Miller
5.0 out of 5 stars Neded for today
Great for debating todays issues. The facts are easy to comprehend, easy to digest and usually answers all the questions that will be asked in a debate.
Published 3 months ago by William R Howe
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Forums

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Topic From this Discussion
SPENCER brilliant in manipulating facts.
What is Robert Spencer's "agenda"? To inform us about a dangerous ideology is what he is trying to do. Was Churchill evil incarnate for pointing out the dangers of Nazism? I don't think so and unfortunately Suzanne, you and others like you will be shown to be the equivalent of modern... Read more
Aug 29, 2006 by Sean |  See all 240 posts
Isn't there an unbiased book on this topic?
And PS -- you might try "Infidel," by the Somali feminist Ayaan Hirsi Ali. A magnificemt, searing autobiography that's gotten over 300 5-star reviews here on Amazon.
Nov 12, 2011 by Daniel G. Schaeffer |  See all 44 posts
Is it the beginning of the end for the West?
Sorry, Mr Oberwein, but read Hannah Arendt's "Ideolgy and Terror" and you'll draw a very different conclusion -- not all religions are ideologies (Buddhism isn't), but all ideologies functions much like monotheistic religions (Marxism surely did) -- and since Islam was political before... Read more
Aug 30, 2011 by Daniel G. Schaeffer |  See all 12 posts
A Bigoted Diatribe
This reader obviously did not pay much attention when reading this book- that particular passage "Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace on Earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword" (Matthew 10:34). IS QUOTED - very clearly - on page 27. The comparisons between Jesus... Read more
Apr 7, 2006 by A reader |  See all 20 posts
only in USA such a stupid writers can make money
Ignorance is the absence of knowledge. Mr. Spencer is very knowlegable of his subject. He uses,and documents, primary sources including, but not limited to, the Koran and Muhammed himself. The truth may not be liked, but popularity doesn't change the facts.
May 20, 2006 by History lady |  See all 140 posts
ANTI-SEMITIC RANT OF SPENCER
Let's see, what religion institutionalizes the hatred of Jews (Pigs and Apes)? What religion has spread primarily through Jihad and Dhimmitude at the point of a sword? What religion is responsible for undpeakable violence on every continent now? Have you studied the Koran at all? Are you at all... Read more
Aug 29, 2006 by Sean |  See all 131 posts
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 






Look for Similar Items by Category