Politicizing Science: The Alchemy of Policymaking and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Qty:1
  • List Price: $15.00
  • Save: $3.29 (22%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Good | Details
Sold by Dana Park
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Pages are smooth and clear, with minimal folds or creases. Minor page curl. Pages and covers have minimal (less than 10% of text) marks/highlighting. Minor to moderate surface and edge wear to cover. *** Fast Amazon shipping, delivery tracking number, no-hassle return policy - your satisfaction is guaranteed!
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Politicizing Science: The Alchemy of Policymaking Paperback – July 15, 2003


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
$11.71
$10.44 $1.57
Year-End%20Deals%20in%20Books

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Holiday Deals in Books
Holiday Deals in Books
Find deals for every reader in the Holiday Deals in Books store, featuring savings of up to 50% on cookbooks, children's books, literature & fiction, and more.

Product Details

  • Series: HOOVER INST PRESS PUBLICATION
  • Paperback: 313 pages
  • Publisher: Hoover Institution Press; 1st Edition edition (July 15, 2003)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0817939326
  • ISBN-13: 978-0817939328
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,539,366 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

Politics and science make strange bedfellows. In politics, perceptions are reality and facts are negotiable. The competing interests, conflicting objectives, and trade-offs of political negotiations often lend themselves to bending the truth and selectively interpreting facts to shape outcomes. In science, facts are reality. This collection examines the conflicts that arise when politics and science converge. In Politicizing Science, eleven leading scientists describe the politicization—through misapplication or overemphasis of results that favor a political decision or through outright manipulation—of scientific findings and deliberations to advance policy agendas. They show how the consequences of politicization are inflicted on the public, including the diversion of money and research efforts from worthwhile scientific endeavors, the costs of unnecessary regulations, and the losses of useful products—while increased power and prestige flow to those who manipulate science. The authors of three essays describe government diversions of scientific research and the interpretation of scientific findings away from where the evidence leads and toward directions deemed politically desirable. Three more contributions analyze the expensive and extensive efforts devoted to altering images of risk in order to establish linkages in the public’s mind between deleterious human health effects and various areas of scientific research. Two essays examine the workings and results of consensus advisory panels and conclude that their recommendations are often based on far-from-certain science and driven by social and political dynamics that substitute group cohesion in favor of independent, critical thinking. Authors of two essays describe the unfortunate results of application of the "precautionary principle," which generally requires proof of no risk before a new product is introduced or an existing product can be continued in use. A concluding essay describes the personal costs of opposing the politicization of science.

Michael Gough, a biologist, has participated in science policy issues at the congressional Office of Technology Assessment, in Washington think tanks, and on various advisory panels.

Contributors: Bruce Ames, Roger Bate, Bernard L. Cohen, Lois Swirsky Gold, William Happer, Joseph P. Martino, Patrick J. Michaels, Henry I. Miller, Robert Nilsson, Stephen Safe, S. Fred Singer


More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.2 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

9 of 11 people found the following review helpful By Midwest Book Review on October 14, 2003
Format: Paperback
Expertly compiled and edited by Michael Gough (an expert on Risk Assessment and Environmental Policy at the George Marshall Institute, Washington, D.C.), Politicizing Science: The Alchemy Of Policy Making is an impressive collection of insightful and informative essays by a diverse variety of learned authors concerning the intersection of politics and science in modern-day America. From the political repercussions of what science had to say of Agent Orange and Dioxin, to the attempted political suppression of science in the Revelle-Gore issue, and more, Politicizing Science is a crucial and very highly recommended body of perspectives for surveying the political workings of society and the impact they have upon the latest science research results.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
10 of 13 people found the following review helpful By Paul Grant on October 19, 2003
Format: Paperback
The following is taken from the opening paragraph of the review by Paul M. Grant of "Politicizing Science" , that appeared in the October 16th issue of the journal Nature:
"This is not suitable bedtime reading - not if you want to fall asleep, that is. Those who think that public policy should be based on sound science will be left in despair that such a goal can ever be achieved in the midst of the competing political interests endemic to modern industrialized democratic societies, exacerbated by scientific illiteracy on the part of both leadership and electorate.
Politicizing Science relates the personal trials and tribulations of 12 scientists whose careers were directly affected when their scientific advice conflicted with the political interests of those in power."
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful By J. L. Williams on February 5, 2010
Format: Paperback
Gough's edited volume does have something important to say: science is an inherently human endeavor and as such, is subject to the vagaries of use and abuse that are typical of the political process. Science has a very large part to play in government risk assessment activities, and consumers of that knowledge should have a healthy respect for its use.

Unfortunately, with the except of the piece by Safe and that of Ames and Gold, the book falls into the same trap it accuses its opponents of falling into. And herein lies the problem; knowledge, in the form of science, is inherently neutral - it is a tool for use by everyone. The selected case studies for this volume argue that science shows that those on the left are wrong and those on the right are correct. But the case study authors, with the noted exceptions, really show is that they are just as guilty of mis-use of science as are the villains they pillory. Facts are drawn from less-than-scientifcally-rigorous sources; arguments are passionate and lacking in context or background information; and conclusions contain little in the way of recommanded ways forward. If you agree that government, liberals, and people who think pollution is a negative are bad for the country and should just keep their traps shut, then this book is for you. Your ideas will not be challenged.

However, if you are interested in experiencing a less-grating, better-cited, and more thorough (and actual) analysis of the full picture of how science is and is not abused by both political parties, I recommend including this in your library but only as one of many sources.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
4 of 22 people found the following review helpful By worddancer VINE VOICE on December 8, 2006
Format: Paperback
What an appalling book.

It's not the fact that the book issues cautions about the dangers of politicized science that is problematical. Clearly the dangers here are real and serious. I wish that more people thought about such problems.

It is, rather, the fact that the so many of the 'arguments' presented are shoddy, blatantly political right-wing polemics against the 'suppression' of 'sound science' (=corporate funded, laissez-faire, regulate nothing, manipulated 'science'). According to the contributors to this volume, the forces of darkness on the left who, because they express concerns about the public health and plantary consequences of not regulating pollution (e.g.), and favor a more precautionary approach to environmental policy questions, are guilty of having failed to pay adequate obeisance to "the historically postive linkage between science and economic development." (Tobacco industry 'science,' anyone?)

If (part of) one sentence can convey the flavor of the book, it is this: "...'[E]nvironmentalism' has attracted some whose motives...are hard to distinguish from those of Lysenko..."

If you actually are interested in reading about the evils wrought by the political manipulation of science, try reading THE REPUBLICAN WAR ON SCIENCE or UNDERMINING SCIENCE.
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again