| |||||||||||||||
|
There is a newer edition of this item:
|
Authors Michael Roskin and James Coyle have written a clear, engaging text that will enable students to better understand the politics of the Middle East. With two separate chapters on Turkey and the Kurds, as well as great, in-depth coverage of Middle Eastern history, geography, and conflictsincluding the 2003 Iraq warthis Middle Eastern politics text illustrates the interrelated complexities of the Middle East in ways that will seem real rather than abstract.
Je ne blame, ni n'accuse. Je raconte.
Talleyrand
One of the authors and a daughter recently chanced upon the film classic Lawrence of Arabia on television. She was curious: Who were these people? Whom were they fighting? When did it take place? Why were the British involved? This bright young college graduate had never learned anything of World War I in the Middle East and the British-encouraged Arab revolt against the Turks. Indeed, few young (and not-so-young) Americans know anything about this colorful episode and how it influences the Middle East to this day. Few Americans care about things distant in time and place. They tend to consign current conflicts to the realm of mystery and futility: "Those people! They're crazy. Their motives are a puzzle, maybe something to do with their religion. I don't know much about the area, but if our government says we'll have to fight, I guess we'll have to." In the same spirit of ignorant bliss we marched into Vietnam.
The authors aim to acquaint American students with this vital, exciting part of the world, which is very much in the news but not, unfortunately, very much among the courses American students typically take. Moving more and more to the vocational and career-related, few students have the knowledge to make sense of the Middle East. Filling the vacuum, many advocate either strong doses of U.S. military might or isolationism: "We should either nuke 'em or stay out."
Many subscribe to the "none of our business" theory: "If those people want to fight, we should just stand back and let them fight." This school-playground approach to the Middle East leads quickly to catastrophe. One recent president started office with a hands-off policy but was soon forced to become more involved than any of his predecessors. He discovered, as did many American isolationists before him, that we are connected to much of the rest of the world. In the Middle East, especially, we can neither fully stay out nor fully control the region, a frustrating situation. Staying out means letting Middle East conflicts roar out of control until they engulf several countries and damage the region's ability to export oil. When that happens, the entire world economy suffers. America imports relatively little Middle Eastern oil (although the percentage is growing), but a shortfall in production anywhere boosts prices everywhere.
The authors noticed that many works on the Middle East are too specialized and scholarly for a first undergraduate course in the area. With years of experience in college teaching on the region, government service, and journalism, we decided to put together our own textbook, covering Middle Eastern history, geography, and conflicts, including the 2003 Iraq War. That war, by the way, illustrates the interrelated complexity of the Middle East. To understand the 2003 war, one must understand a good deal of the history, geography, and politics not only of Iraq but also of all the neighboring countries. Two areas are especially shortchanged in most textbooksTurkey and the Kurdswhich we try to correct by giving each separate chapters.
Knowledge of geography is especially weak among young Americans, so we include "bounding" exercises throughout the book. This old-fashioned exercise requires the student to recite, from forced recall, countries' boundaries, moving clockwise around the points of the compass. If you do them faithfully, you will be able to locate from memory every country of the region. Memorization makes you smarter (and yes, they will be on the exams).
In recent years the news media have used "Middle East" as synonymous with the Israeli-Arab struggle. When they talk about Iraq or Saudi Arabia, they often say "Persian Gulf." Actually, the two are both Middle East and, although a few hundred miles apart, interconnected. Israel angers the Muslim world and serves as fodder for radical Islamists who would like to take over the Gulf oil states, which already encourage and subsidize Palestinian movements, some of them violent.
Instructors may notice that we interweave much general material in our chapters, everything from praetorianism to bureaucratic politics in Washington. All apply to the Middle East but have wider applicability as well. This is part of our purpose, to build what the French call culture generale. Topics in the abstract often become real when introduced in a relevant context. Accordingly, students will learn a great deal beyond the Middle East from this book. The authors thank Cullen Chandler, Mehrdad Madresehee, Robin Knauth, and Steven Johnson of Lycoming College for their valuable comments. We also thank the following reviewers: James L. Lutz, Indiana University-Purdue; Stephen Zunes, University of San Francisco; and Larbi Sadiki, University of Exeter.
The Middle East is full of controversies, and we are aware that our accounts and analyses may anger some readers. In many areas we are likely to be accused of either hostility toward or slavish support of a given cause. We are neither hostile nor slavish; we are simply realists. We look forward to "twining" one letter that calls us anti-X with the next that calls us pro-X. Our purpose is not to take sides but to tell several fascinating, complex stories in an accurate and balanced way. We do not play the "blame game" but recall Talleyrand, who served France before, during, and after Napoleon with equal aplomb: "I do not blame, neither do I accuse. I just tell the story."
Michael G. Roskin
James J. Coyle
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Informative, but entirely biased.,
By
This review is from: Politics of the Middle East: Cultures and Conflicts (2nd Edition) (Paperback)
Authors Roskin and Coyle tackle quite a few subjects in this book -- ranging anywhere from the roots of Islam, to conservative Saudi Arabia, to secular Turkey, and to what lies ahead in the future of Islam. I think that the authors do a fabulous job of making their points clear and concise. Overall, the material is very interesting for someone who is interested in Middle Eastern culture and politics.However, this book is sprinkled with one-liners that are so biased and can turn the reader off to the whole book. For instance, when discussing the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the author says that "Arabs tend to be awfully loose with their words." You can't get any more ignorant than that. Sure, some may view this as comical, and perhaps this would be more acceptable in a novel or editorial column. But this is a scholarly work and such phrases do not belong on its pages if it is to serve an educational purpose. There are countless other examples of similar jargon throughout the book. Again, I will restate that this is an interesting book. It covers alot of ground and has alot of cultural sidenotes that make the history more interesting. But what Roskin and Coyle need to do is leave their personaly opinions about Arabs and Jews out of their academic textbooks if they wish to be taken more seriously.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|