Poly Mop Wringer Bucket, 14 Qt

by Dover Parkersburg

Product Features

• 46PL POLY MOP WRINGER PAIL14QT
• 14QT POLY MOP WRINGER PAIL

Product Description

From the Manufacturer

High grade polyethylene construction; chocolate brown color. Will not crack, rust or dent, will not scratch or mar floors. Oval pail. Extra thick upper rim adds strength. Two wooden rollers squeeze water from mops. Strong steel bail handle with contouredgrip.

Product Description

High-grade polyethylene construction. Will not crack, rust or dent, will not scratch or mar floors. Extra-thick upper rim adds strength. 2 wooden rollers squeeze water from mops. Strong steel bail handle with contoured grip.

Product Details

• Shipping Weight: 4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• ASIN: B00002N5XG
• Item model number: 46PL
• Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

13 of 16 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent for string mops - not a large roller surface for clothes, September 3, 2009

By 

Summer "Breeze" (USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Poly Mop Wringer Bucket, 14 Qt (Kitchen)

This mop bucket with wooden rollers is an excellent tool aid with a string mop to clean floors. For years, I relied on it and appreciated it didn't rust or corrode from the various cleaners I poured unto the water or from the many times the bucket was left out on the back porch.

Recently, I confronted what apartment dwellers face when there is no room for a washer-dryer. Besides the incredible expense, trekking back and forth to the laundromat is not always a convenience. After much research and trying to find a reasonably priced clothes wringer (anything above $100 isn't reasonable), I realized once again American manufacturers and retailers have let their consumers down.

The closest item to an old-fashioned clothes wringer, priced under $100, is a mop bucket with two wooden rollers that are somewhere around eight inches long. Applying appropriate tension to the rollers while pulling the wet clothes through is with the weight of one hand or a foot on the platform above the rollers. Imagine trying to achieve that while hunkered over a bathtub!

Funny thing! The whole planet is talking about going green, so where are the manual clothes wringers? But, wait! Long before going green became the current catch phrase, many American people have been needing manual clothes wringers reasonably priced. We need a competitive market. Not everyone can afford a big house with a laundry room, but everyone needs clean clothes. Why have the go-get-em entrepreneurs not realized how many apartment dwellers there are who need some simple, realistically-priced solutions to everyday issues. The market (and the numbers) in this country is there.

A couple of wooden rolling pins (wood choices that don't stain) stacked on a frame and attached to a geared rotating handle make laundry time simpler as well as easier and less tiring. I wish I had the talent to build a few wringers, and market them here on amazon.com. Okay, Donny Deutsch, how's that for a big idea?

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Small and efficient., February 27, 2011

By 

Elizabeth Draper (Brooklyn, NY, US) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Poly Mop Wringer Bucket, 14 Qt (Kitchen)

This little mop bucket was exactly what I needed for a my small apt. Previously, I had hand wrung the mop (gross!) or had to use a large commercial bucket which just took up a ton of space in the utility closet. This is small, heavy duty, high quality and does the job.

3.0 out of 5 stars poly mop wringer bucket, January 9, 2012

By 

Don C. Howell (Lockhart, Tx.) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Poly Mop Wringer Bucket, 14 Qt (Kitchen)

The bucket is certainly the right size, however, if too much pressure is put on the wringer, it could easily break. Not as substantial as I had hoped. For small mops, it is more than effecient.

d.howell