| ||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
You'll enjoy this book,
By
This review is from: Port Out, Starboard Home (Hardcover)
Chances are you've received via e-mail one of the many lists of the etymological origins of words and phrases. As you have probably learned from more respected sources than your e-mail buddy, most of these putative origins, although interesting and clever, are nevertheless false. One of the most vibrant and entertaining of the respected sources is Michael Quinion, researcher and contributor to the Oxford English Dictionary and writer on words.
In Port Out, Starboard Home and Other Language Myths, Quinion reveals the true origins of some well-known words and phrases, as well as the not-so-obvious associations between one common word and another (for example, "barbecue" and "buccaneer"). Quinion tracks the trail wherever it may lead, and we are happy to follow along. From the writings of Geoffrey Chaucer to Irving Berlin, Quinion finds the gem. He manages to locate the most obscure texts ever written (Where does he find these things - and how does he know to look in that particular text?) to unearth the very first instance of publication of a given word or phrase. Then he brings us back to our modern-day term with a better understanding of how it came to be. Conjecture, speculation, and personal opinion are all clearly stated. Been "called on the carpet"? Is your car "on the fritz"? Got a "bug" in your computer program? Find out the origins of these terms and learn why it's likely that most of the explanations you've heard are probably false. This is an absorbing book that would be of interest to anyone with a curiosity about the origins of words and phrases. The only problem is that it's too short - and Quinion never tells us how much wood a woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
`The fascinating stories we tell about the words we use.',
By J. Cameron-Smith "Expect the Unexpected" (ACT, Australia) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER) (REAL NAME)
This review is from: Port Out, Starboard Home (Hardcover)
I have two shelves full of books about the English language. Each is different, each has its own strengths, weaknesses and quirks. Michael Quinion's book is one of those to which I turn if I'm looking for some insight into common language myths.
The issue of accuracy and authenticity is one I'll leave for the experts. I don't need to be as definitive as they would prefer to be. For me, words are tools to be enjoyed, considered and used. There is, of course, one shattered myth that has caused me personal discomfort. That relates to the origin of CABAL (cabal). Imagine my momentary distress at learning that this was not (as I'd long thought) an acronym formed from the names of the five preeminent leaders in Charles II's government of 1667-1673. Still, it is of little consequence: I'll consider it a mnemonic instead. Clifford, Arlington, Buckingham, Ashley and Lauderdale may have even had a far greater impact on language than they did on Charles II's government. And the real origin of cabal? Well, apparently, it came into English via the French `cabale' from the medieval Latin `cabbala'. And there's more ... Enjoy. Jennifer Cameron-Smith
18 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
POSH Port Out, Starboard Home. by Michael Quinion,
By
This review is from: Port Out, Starboard Home (Hardcover)
J. P. Maher Ph. D. Professor Emeritus of LinguisticsOxford University Press editor Angela Blackburn told me in 1984 that "etymology doesn't sell." Michael Quinion's. POSH should sell. It is a better than average refutation of a lot of "etymomythology". True, but not new is Quinion's debunk of the myth that HM colonials sailing off to the Raj in India took cabins "port out, starboard home"- to be on the shady side of the ship. I wish Quinion more success than a Chicago Tribune reader had in 1980 with the same debunk. Dear Editor phoned the author to say he had received over twenty protest letters defending the nautical apocryphon. For "balance", Dear Editor printed a "rebuttal", probably written by himself or a flack posing as a visitor to our fair city, selflessly taking time out from his busy architecture tour to pen the magisterial letter.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|