11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Best Introduction to Postmodernism BUT, November 6, 2001
This review is from: Postmodern Theory (Paperback)
I remember my first encounter with postmodernism over 10 years ago when I started college and wished for a more gentle introduction. Pomo authors are notoriously difficult to understand not so much because their work is diffucult, but their texts are seldom self containted. To understand Foucault, you must know something about Nietszche, Heidigger, and to a smaller extent, Satre. In fact, to understand Foucault, you would have to read quite a bit of Foucault's canon because each text in each period of his writing is a collage of a much bigger picture.
I think this is the best introduction to postmodernism on the market. The authors discuss several seminal figures in pomo: Foucault, Baudrillard, Lyotard, etc. Their summaries and analysis are frequently good but at times flawed. This book is a good primer into pomo but I would not end with this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An uncluttered examination of postmodernism, February 6, 2001
I agree with one of the other reviewers of this book. If you don't have a knack for sorting out the often convoluted writing styles of postmodern theorists, this book would not be a good introductory text for the novice. That aside, the book successfully, for me, meandered through the postmodern junkpiles of many of the more well known postmodernists of the last 30 years: Lyotard, Jameson, Baudrillard, Foucault, Deleuze & Guattari, and Habermas, to name a few. I liked it that Best and Kellner's politics and goals were always unappolagetically evident. Their effort to systematically conceptualize each theorist's contribution to "postmodernism", and to explore the points at which different theorists cross path, depart in different directions, and/or altogether miss each other, is to hypothesize the possibility and need of a critical postmodernism - one that reflectively grounds and ungrounds itself in the traditions of critical theory and postmodernism. The translucencency of their analysis makes them not so much an objective observer of postmodernist writings, but situatuates them within the debates as participants. I believe that their review and arguments were cogent and progressive. It is a great book for exploring the primary texts you plan to hit.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This was a great find, June 27, 2006
This review is from: Postmodern Theory (Paperback)
Anyone who's studied only a few of the major thinkers in postmodern thought may find themselves losing touch with the larger picture-- that is, what constitutes postmodernism? Or even, what are the major themes and problems of this subject matter? Answering these questions is fundamental in order to assist a reader of postmodernist texts in knowing simply just what to look for while reading as well as understanding the value of postmodernism in its effectiveness to critique modern conditions. Best and Kellner have written the only book I've found with an attempt to answer these questions. It's written for serious beginners or well-read intermediate-level students, not with the implicit assumption of a lazy reader (as in titles like 'Kant in 90 Minutes' or 'Postmodernism for Dummies').
Both Terry Eagleton ('After Theory', 'Literary Theory') and these writers have been accused of oversimplification or misleading readers on the meaning of certain concepts. I'm not in a position to assert these claims, but I make it a habit not to treat any text as Biblical truth. Certianly, as I read more I will develop my own ideas about the precise meanings of concepts described by Foucault, Deleuze and others. With that in mind, I've found Postmodern Theory to be an outstanding overview of the authors under discussion. It is a difficult book, but written with a clarity such that the language is no impediment to following the discourse. That is, I can read it on a crowded bus :)
Early on, the authors differentiate between poststructuralism and postmodernism. The thinkers under discussion all fall into the latter school. Poststructuralists like Derrida are therefore not covered under the book's scope. Many major thinkers have chapters dedicated to them: Foucault, Deleuze, Guattari, Baudrillard, Lyotard; other chapters discuss the critical theory of the Frankfurt School: Marxism, Jameson, Adorno, Habermas, and finally, a chapter looking "toward the reconstruction of critical social theory" which describes where postmodernism succeeds and fails in its critique of the problems it wishes to analyze. Primarily, Kellner and Best focus on postmodernism's overriding themes: micropolitics, irrationalism, and the attack on the grand narratives of modernist or structuralist philosophies. The authors endorse the critical theory of the Frankfurt School as a more effective groundwork methodology to analyze capitalism and other modern dilemma and finally, conclude that for all postmodernism has to offer, its methods are fundamentally useless and its course, a dead-end. Read postmodernism, they say, learn from it, enjoy it, but take it with a grain of salt. This 'conclusion' is not a surprise finale to the book, but is a criticism that pervades the text.
Rather than the chronological histories found in many histories of philosophy, the book's organization is mostly topical, while the writers do provide information on the timelines and relationships between authors, including influences and comparative analyses of authors' thoughts. The thrust of the book is to give readers a sense of the variegated governing principles of postmodern thought and reference the sources of these ideas, assisting the reader immeasurably in sifting through your bookstores' section of cultural theory to find the books you're ready to dive into. The principles discussed by Best and Kellner typically revolve around the postmodern interpretations of history and the organization of society. They illuminate obtuse ideas such as those found in the frustratingly (and wonderfully) cryptic works of Deleuze and Guattari, and provide descriptions of the overall patterns of thought for many postmodern thinkers.
For me, this was a diamond in the rough and is certain to vastly improve my reading comprehension in the future, as well as help me to choose between authors I may or may not be interested in. Highly recommended for those who feel lost in the dense reams of postmodern theory.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
