Ezra Pound (Literary Lives) [Paperback]

Peter Ackroyd (Author)

Book Description

Series: Literary Lives | Publication Date: June 1987

Presents the life and discusses the works of the controversial and influential American poet and critic.

Product Details

• Paperback: 128 pages
• Publisher: Thames & Hudson; First Edition edition (June 1987)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0500260257
• ISBN-13: 978-0500260258
• Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 7.1 x 0.3 inches
• Shipping Weight: 9.6 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,000,404 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4 of 7 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars helpful, February 27, 2002

By 

Orrin C. Judd "brothersjudddotcom" (Hanover, NH USA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Ezra Pound (Literary Lives) (Paperback)

Let's face it, few of us are likely to hack our way through the thickets (some of them rendered in Chinese) of Ezra Pound's Cantos. Even in college, in a course on
modern literature, we didn't actually read the Cantos, instead we read Hugh Kenner's book, The Pound Era. Still, one would like to understand what made
Pound such an important figure in the history of literature and Peter Ackroyd's slender and copiously illustrated biography accomplishes the task quite painlessly.

Besides helping us to understand what Pound was trying to achieve in his own poetry--which seems to have been an attempt to capture all of reality within the
confines of the poetic form--Mr. Ackroyd shows how profoundly Pound influenced other Modernists, in particular T. S. Eliot and James Joyce. I'd not
previously been aware of the degree to which Pound helped sculpt The Waste Land, to the point that Mr. Ackroyd gives him credit as its virtual co-author :

The transformation of The Waste Land effected by Pound is, although not total, nevertheless remarkable. What had been a longer,
more sustained and more elaborately lyrical work was changed into something less personal, tighter and more abrupt. It was precisely
these qualities which were to lend the poem its air of modernity--since, in large part, our notion of what is "modern" is derived from
Pound's work and criticism.

Where Joyce was concerned, Pound appears to have been one of his earliest proselytizers, publishing Portrait of the Artist in serial form in his magazine, The
Egoist, and Ulysses in the magazine, The Little Review. He also reviewed Joyce's work in every publication he could, extolling his virtues to anyone who would
listen. Yet, Pound also had the brutal honesty to assess Finnegan's Wake with the dismissal that it so richly deserved :

Nothing short of divine vision or a new cure for the clapp can possibly be worth all the circumambient peripherization.

Unfortunately for Pound, the harshness of that critique reveals a willingness to speak his mind and a forcefulness of opinion which were to get him in
considerable trouble when they combined with other personality traits to turn him into a Fascist propagandist.

Mr. Ackroyd convincingly locates the appeal of fascism to Pound in the poet's passion for organization and order, his belief in a cultural elite, and his adherence
to the odd economic theory of Social Credit, expounded by a Major C. H. Douglas :

Its doctrine states, quite simply, that once money has lost its natural basis in people's needs and aspirations--when, in other words,
it has been turned into a commodity merely to be bought and sold--then the nation and its culture sour. Money is a complex
measure of man's time and the worth of his labour; when it becomes an anonymous entity to be hoarded and manipulated, all other
human and social values shift downward. But there was also a blindingly simple economic point to be made in this connection:
the bankers control money at the expense of everyone else in the community.

His belief in a social hierarchy is a classic enough conservative position, likewise his fear of cultural decline. And the rest of Pound's ideas were probably
harmless in themselves, even if some were bizarre; but it is this last notion, that the problems one perceives in the world are necessarily a product of some kind of
conspiracy, that represents the dangerous spark that all too often ignites hatreds like anti-Semitism. True conservatism requires the recognition that disorder
and decline are natural phenomena, resulting from the debased desires of the masses. Those who are unable to accept this reality and instead try to blame
shadowy conspirators are dangerously deluded.

Sadly, Pound fell prey to just such delusions and ended up making radio broadcasts for Mussolini during WWII. The result of these pro-fascist, anti-American,
anti-Semitic soliloquies was a 1943 indictment for treason and eventual arrest and, following a finding of insanity, confinement to St. Elizabeth's mental
hospital in Washington, DC. He was kept there until the charge of treason was dismissed on April 18, 1958. Upon his release, Pound moved back to Italy where
he lapsed into a depressive silence and spent his final years in and out of clinics, futilely trying to find some way to recapture his creative powers.

If in the end it is not possible for us to feel too much sympathy for a man who betrayed his wife--with a mistress named Olga Rudge by whom he had a daughter
and who eventually became his constant companion--and his country, and who spewed venomous hatred of Jews, perhaps it is still possible to acknowledge his
achievements, or at least his aspirations, as an artist. Here's how Mr. Ackroyd summarizes Pound's own literary legacy :

Pound attempted to recreate the whole world in the image of himself and his poetry--despite the divisive tendencies of the age,
and the obsessive weaknesses of his own character.

Maybe in this sense we can see writ small in him the larger tragedy of the 20th Century, of men trying to prove themselves equal to the Creator, but failing
horribly, and finding it necessary to lash out against others to explain the failure.

GRADE : B+