Noted journalist Robert McClory has written a most engaging, historically grounded, and authoritative work that details and clarifies the evolution of the perplexing doctrine of Papal Infallibility, and the people and personalities associated with it.
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Breezy, readable overview,
By
This review is from: Power and the Papacy: The People and Politics Behind the Doctrine of Infallibility (Hardcover)
Robert McClory has written another enjoyable history aimed at the non-scholarly reader. Though the subtitle of "Power and the Papacy" is "The People and the Politics Behind the Doctrine of Infallibility," that's only part of the book. McClory comes from the liberal Catholic angle, and his motivation for writing the book appears to be "Ordinatio Sacerdotalis," John Paul II's decree that the church cannot ordain women, which the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith later claimed was "infallibly taught by the ordinary universal magisterium." McClory decided to give a general history of the doctrine of infallibility, then discusses the current situation.
McClory first gives a general overview of the growth of the role of the papacy in the church. Basically, the author notes that the church of Rome was held in esteem in the early centuries, then discusses how after Constantine's conversion, the church model became more hierarchical, and the Bishop of Rome gradually assumed a larger role. He doesn't cover the patristic period very thoroughly, and for readers who are interested in such an examination, I would suggest Klaus Schatz's Papal Primacy. Of course, the papacy got stronger during the medieval period. During the western schism, when there were 2 competing popes, it appeared that conciliarism, the doctrine that a council was above the pope, was gaining ground. It ultimately failed to do so, however. With the rise of state-church alliances in Austria, France, and other European countries in the 16th century, popes had limited power to interfere with the church affairs of those countries, since they had to consult the secular monarchs. Ultimately, once the state-church system collapsed in the mid-19th century, and the world was in the grip of industrial revolution and the rise of anti-clerical governments, many Catholics believed that a strong papacy, with the ability to speak infallibly on matters of faith, would protect them from the state. It would also offer them certainty in an increasingly uncertain world. Relying on the Frenchman Joseph's de Maistre's book "The Pope," the ultra-Montane movement was formed. Ultra-montane literally means "beyond the mountains"- meaning Italy, or Rome specifically. McClory then discusses the First Vatican Council in 1870 under Pius IX, and the debates that took place during it. The purpose of the council was to discuss the dogma of papal infallibility- that when the Pope speaks ex-cathedra, his statements are irreformable and not subject to the consent of the church. Despite the determined opposition of minority bishops such as Dupanloup, Strossmayer, and Dollinger, Papal Infallibility was declared a dogma. McClory notes that all the minority bishops, under pressure from the Vatican, submitted and accepted the dogma, except Dollinger, who was excommunicated. Academics who continued to speak loudly against the dogma, particularly in Germany, were excommunicated, forming the Old Catholic movement. Finally, the author turns his attention to the situation in the contemporary church. He discusses historians and theologians who either deny infallibility or minimize it. He notes that even John Paul II was reluctant to use "ex-cathedra" pronouncements. McClory discusses the debate on Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, and how far the "Ordinary Universal Magesterium" extends in regards to teaching authority. Essentially, McClory notes that the church has made mistakes in the past, and believes the issue of the ordination of women is an example of such a mistake. He expresses the hope for reform of the church through increased lay participation. Like "Turing Point," "Power and the Papacy" is a fast, easy read which readers of social history and church history will likely enjoy. Ultimately, I think that some change along the lines that McClory is calling for is inevitable, though how long remains to be seen.
11 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
interesting with a liberal slant,
By A Customer
This review is from: Power and the Papacy: The People and Politics Behind the Doctrine of Infallibility (Hardcover)
An interesting and well-researched book that explains the struggle over the Catholic Church's papal infallibility controversy. It is a very readable account but seems to me biased in favour of a more 'collegial' view of infallibility.
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Raises good questions,
By matt (the reading room) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Power and the Papacy: The People and Politics Behind the Doctrine of Infallibility (Hardcover)
McClory raises crucial questions regarding the role of the papacy in both the Catholic Communion and christendom at large. While he is sympathetic to the Catholic Church's authority structure, his reading of the history of the dogma of Papal Infallibility has lead him to understand that the doctrine has been influenced greatly by less than Christian motivations and less than Scriptural perspectives. While many Catholics would reject his conclusions as based upon an inability to see the Holy Spirit's hand in history, or that he misreads the historical record (because we all know that God uses even wrong motivations to accomplish His will), I still think that they could find much value in this book since it will help them to understand the perspective of critics of the Church's dogmatic formation on the principle of authority. As an Eastern Orthodox, I found it useful for the same reasons, disagreeing with the author at various times, but overall appreciative of his analysis. It is not a fluffy book that skims the surface and it is very well-written.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
