$29.59 + $4.99 shipping
In Stock. Sold by power198

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

PowerSmart® 2200mAh 14.4V Lithium-ion Replacement for Dell Inspiron 1440 Inspiron 1750 Laptop Battery 0F965N, J399N

5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: $29.59 + $4.99 shipping
Only 7 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by power198.
  • Battery Type: Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Voltage: 14.40V Capacity: 2200mAh Color: Black
  • Dimension: 204.80 x 48.35 x 20.00 mm || Rate: 32.00 Wh|| Weight: 282.50 g
  • Product Type: Replacement Battery (Brand New) Condition: New, 1 year warranty!
  • Please ensure the product(s) that you are going to buy fits the brand, model, part number
  • and dimension (mentioned above) of your device.
9 new from $29.59

Product Description

This replacement battery is also compatible with the following models:Dell Inspiron 1440, Dell Inspiron 1750

Product Details

  • Product Dimensions: 8.1 x 1.9 x 0.8 inches ; 10.4 ounces
  • Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • ASIN: B009OYQ1FG
  • Item model number: NDE087_6
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #121,508 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics)
  • Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

     Would you like to give feedback on images or tell us about a lower price?

Important Information

Seller Warranty Description
Unless otherwise specified, we warrant our products for 1 year from the date of original purchase under normal, non-commercial use. We guarantee against any defective products. A full refund will be provided for any defective products within 30 days.

Customer Reviews

5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
The battery was just perfect. It fitted great on my computer and it works great. Very happy with the purchase.
Comment 1 of 1 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse