- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
|Price:||$67.99 - $70.00|
|Sale:||Lower price available on select options|
What if your pajamas were made from hemp and recycled plastic, with a crazy amount of stretch, and they had front pockets and a drawstring waist? We use them for yoga and bouldering, and the occasional nap on the grass.
I really like the comfort and feel of these pants. I wish they weren't so long, otherwise they'd fit perfectly! It shouldn't be a problem to have them hemmed.Published 12 days ago by J. Price
I have 4 pairs of these pants so obviously I like them. This was the first pair that the waist size was smaller than the other pairs.Published 1 month ago by Gary Yamane
Love these pants. I've bought many from prana of this style. I don't like elastic bands as they chinch uncomfortably around waist nor the button and zipper styled pants which are... Read morePublished 1 month ago by Paul S. Fratianni
I wear this all of the time. im about 5 9 and i expected this to be pretty long in the fit so i went with the small. Read morePublished 1 month ago by connor randall
The waist and legs were a lot longer/larger than I expected.
Had the legs hemmed up and now are very comfortable!
Breathable great for being active. Read more
Pants are great, I needed them for a specific event, but I still wear them. They are comfy, I just would not pay this much for this type of pant.Published 2 months ago by Burhan
Have purchased three pants and 2 shorts. This product is outstanding and, even though they are pricey, well worth the extra $$$. Great for yoga and kicking around.Published 3 months ago by Alan Elliott
Look is good, fit is good, feel is good. A very sweet pant made by Prana. Happy to recommend it.Published 4 months ago by Jacob Liang
I love these pants. Super comfortable, and great for the hot summer here in the South. I practice jiu jitsu, and like to work on my flexibility by stretching around the office. Read morePublished 4 months ago by Lev Shulman