Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

The President as Party Leader (Contributions in Political Science) Paperback – March 30, 1992

ISBN-13: 978-0275941123 ISBN-10: 0275941124
Buy used
Buy new
Used & new from other sellers Delivery options vary per offer
29 used & new from $11.44
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback, March 30, 1992
"Please retry"
$12.33 $11.44

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Check out The Amazon Book Review, our editors' fresh new blog featuring interviews with authors, book reviews, quirky essays on book trends, and regular columns by our editors. Explore now
$27.95 FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Temporarily out of stock. Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Editorial Reviews


?He is well versed in the lore of the institution. The text abounds with anecdotes, and general readers will be enlightened.?-Journal of Politics

Book Description

This history and analysis examines the political process, relations between the president and Congress and political parties, and discusses reforms that may make presidents more effective leaders.


Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: Contributions in Political Science
  • Paperback: 240 pages
  • Publisher: Praeger (March 30, 1992)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0275941124
  • ISBN-13: 978-0275941123
  • Product Dimensions: 6.1 x 0.5 x 9.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #11,334,271 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Patricia B. Ross on July 24, 2010
Format: Hardcover
If the political party of Governors or Presidents is reviewed for the last 400 years, what can be found most frequently is that the political party of those persons has been dropped - in recognition of the fact that a Governor or President represents all of the persons under his/her jurisdiction. To govern otherwise would be political darwinism at its finest and most detrimental.

Historical ethics of the separation between political party and political office has not been maintained, however, and today politicians are often considered the leaders of their party rather than holders of public office. Party comes first, not second or third - as one might surmise is characteristic of the nature of the office, and how it is obtained.

Oaths of office are no longer first in the minds of citizens either, and the tolerance for political leadership far exceeds the expectations of the nature of the office-holder to perform the rigors of the office.

Presuming that there is no difference between political darwinism and economic darwinism, deciding how much darwinism the people governed can sustain becomes the principle beneath any scrutiny of government. While some might imagine that obligations of office holders may be adverse to political party interests, there is no basis for such belief if it is not the political parties who operate government in remote through influence upon the throne. While advancing party interests, using current office holders to lead the way, it rather verifies the reality that political office holders are little more than puppets of political organizations.

Otherwise, there would be no need to use them at all.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again