From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
26 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Very little of merit here,
By A Customer
This review is from: Presumed Guilty: An Investigation into the Jon Benet Ramsey Case, the Media, and the Culture of Pornography (Hardcover)
Stephen Singular's "Presumed Guilty" is a difficult book to assess. I should state at the outset that I have no knowledge of the murder of JonBenet Ramsey other than what I have learned through the various media. I am therefore not in a position to assess the accuracy of the information the author presents based on my personal knowledge. I do, however, have training in law, and I find some disconcertingly egregious errors regarding Singular's misstatements of law.The book begins with a prologue that seems primarily designed to convince the reader of Singular's unique (if one will pardon the pun) status as a reporter of crime and as a moral authority. People in Denver, he tells us, "were trashing one of the most basic principles of our legal system--the presumption of innocence" by speculating that the Ramsey parents murdered their daughter. Soon after, Singular attacks the media for analyzing President Clinton's speeches, thereby violating his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The list of alleged constitutional violations continues, but the problem with Singular's accusations is that they are wrong and hypocritical. First, the idea that the media are violating Clinton's constitutional rights by analyzing his words is farcical. Second, Singular laments media accusations while he makes his own. Apparently, he excludes himself from the moral dicta he reserves for others. The book, therefore, is one that I view with intense skepticism. Naturally, an author who is ignorant of basic law may still be accurate in other respects. However, the egregiousness of the errors and the author's double standard detract from his trustworthiness. Of the crime itself, Singular tells us little. The main contribution he makes is in his theory that the killing is related to Internet pornography, though there is little evidence in the book to support the theory. Indeed, the theory almost seems to be an afterthought to the book, added without regard to cohesiveness. It is ironic that a book that begins by upbraiding the media for thinking that the parents murdered their daughter ends by suggesting that at least one of the parents abetted the killer. Though the essential aspects of "Presumed Guilty" are misguided or insubstantial, there is a fair amount of inside information that is interesting and saves this book from the nadir of investigative journalism, albeit only barely. The author depicts, as others have, the chasm separating Boulder's two law-enforcement branches, the police and the district attorney's office. In addition, Singular provides some firsthand insights about one particular tabloid reporter. Finally, there is Singular's commentary on the "culture of pornography" (as the title suggests). Sadly, though, Singular's skills are not sufficient to make much of a case regarding this culture and its intersection with the child beauty pageants that, arguably, launched the case to national prominence.
18 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
singularly strange and disappointing,
This review is from: Presumed Guilty: An Investigation into the Jon Benet Ramsey Case, the Media, and the Culture of Pornography (Hardcover)
Mr. Singular poses the question, "What if Jon Benet's death was connected to the dark world of child pornography?" He poses this question to the police, district attorneys, friends of the ramseys -- and he believes it is enormously significant that his question is universally met with a long silence, followed by the comment, "that's very interesting." Has this guy ever been in therapy? Doesn't he know that the responses he's getting are either pure politeness or an attempt to discover just how deep his craziness runs? He offers no evidence to support his scenario and not only raises more questions that he answers, but he questions his own answers -- every other sentence in this book ends with a question mark. This is investigative reporting? Mr. Singular castigates the media for presuming the guilt of the ramseys without evidence -- but he feels no shame about putting forward his own nightmare scenario and presuming its validity without offering a shred of evidence.
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
I'd like a refund, please...,
By A Customer
This review is from: Presumed Guilty: An Investigation into the Jon Benet Ramsey Case, the Media, and the Culture of Pornography (Hardcover)
This book was tedious to read. You never "tell" us anything, Mr. Singular, you merely re-hash what everybody already knows. Do you think we are gullible enough to believe that NOBODY in the enire Colorado law enforcement community knew anything about internet porn before you came onto the scene? It's a good thing you were on the scene, though, or this crime would never have been solved.........Oh, wait a minute, this crime isn't solved, is it? So what did you add? You poked around, asked a few questions, made a few suggestions, and pointed the finger in directions other than the most popular suspects. Quite an accomplishment. I don't agree with how the case has been handled by the Police and DA, but you certainly don't have any place there getting in everybody's way. Maybe you should have read your own book before you sent it to the publisher.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|