Pride/Prejudice and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
  • List Price: $14.99
  • Save: $1.70 (11%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Eligible for FREE SUPER SAVER SHIPPING!! Amazon customer service AND delivery tracking! This book is in overall good condition!
Add to Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Pride/Prejudice: A Novel of Mr. Darcy, Elizabeth Bennet, and Their Forbidden Lovers Paperback – January 26, 2010

See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
Paperback, January 26, 2010
$2.00 $0.01

Frequently Bought Together

Pride/Prejudice: A Novel of Mr. Darcy, Elizabeth Bennet, and Their Forbidden Lovers + Phyllida and the Brotherhood of Philander: A Novel
Price for both: $19.27

Buy the selected items together

If you buy a new print edition of this book (or purchased one in the past), you can buy the Kindle edition for only $2.99 (Save 69%). Print edition purchase must be sold by Amazon. Learn more.

Hero Quick Promo
Browse in Books with Buzz and explore more details on selected titles, including the current pick, "The Bone Clocks" by David Mitchell.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 432 pages
  • Publisher: Harper Paperbacks (January 26, 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0061863130
  • ISBN-13: 978-0061863134
  • Product Dimensions: 1 x 5.2 x 8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 2.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (26 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,014,199 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

No Cliff's Notes required for this classic, recast by Herendeen (Phyllida and the Brotherhood of Philander) with a bisexual backstory that would have had the Regency author blushing. Though Herendeen claims she's merely unearthed the hidden story from clues already written into the original, what unquestionably occurs in this unlikely redo is erotic, witty and as often silly as refreshing. Here, Elizabeth Bennett and Fitzwilliam Darcy match wits and sexual appetites while engaging in same-sex relationships, she with older-and-wiser Charlotte, he with younger and pliable Charles Bingley, who struggles with his attraction to Elizabeth's sister, Jane. Sure, the permutations make the already complicated plot even more convoluted, but the sex—hokey as it is with all the pulsing and throbbing—helps ease the prideful misunderstandings and ignorant prejudices. (Jan.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


“Audacious and masterful. . . . True to Austen’s spirit, Ann Herendeen has given us a compelling, and sexual, novel of manners. In scenes that illuminate the motives and intellects of our favorite characters, we witness their most private moments. Delectable.” (Pamela Regis, author of A Natural History of the Romance Novel)

“Ann Herendeen has turned Jane Austen’s beloved classic novel on its head with this beautifully written ‘what if’ story. It is the erotic retelling of Jane’s very eighteenth century characters. The book is surprisingly creative and makes this version timely, realistic and clever fun. An entertaining read!” (Sandra Kitt, national bestselling author of Close Encounters and For All We Know)

“I gobbled up this delicious book in one sexy/cerebral reading orgy. Now I need to go back and marvel at my leisure, at its author’s wealth of insight and imagination.” (Pam Rosenthal, RITA Award-winning author of The Edge of Impropriety)

More About the Author

A native New Yorker and lifelong resident of Brooklyn, Ann Herendeen has worked as a researcher for an urban planning consultant; an advertising media planner; a public and academic business reference librarian; a trademarks monitor for an intellectual property law firm; and a cataloging librarian specializing in natural history. Ann is a graduate of Princeton University (B.A. with High Honors), where she majored in English while maintaining a strong interest in English history. She enjoys reading--and writing--for escape.

In 'Phyllida and the Brotherhood of Philander,' Ann put a new twist on a traditional form, creating the ultimate love story she always wanted to read: a bisexual (m/m/f menage) historical romance. In 'Pride/​Prejudice,' she dares to tell the hidden bisexual story within Jane Austen's classic novel.

Customer Reviews

Pretty much nothing can faze me.
S. Foster
If you are expecting another version of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, this book is no where near it.
Amazon Customer
I only finished this book just because I couldn't stop laughing at the shear amount of ridiculousiness.
Mandie Dietz

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

42 of 47 people found the following review helpful By S. Foster on January 28, 2010
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
To start, I have absolutely nothing against the content of this book. I've been around long enough and read enough fanfiction based on many different series/books/movies spanning many genres. Pretty much nothing can faze me. I'm sure this book is meant to be tongue-in-cheek and a bit shocking. The "Achilles/Patroclus" type of relationship between Darcy and Bingley doesn't squick me. End disclaimer.

But you see, I'm a Pride & Prejudice retelling/reinvention/modern adaptation collector. I've got shelves full of books putting a different spin on P&P. This book won't find a home on those shelves.

My problem lies in the fact that I am simply unable to imagine the characters from Pride & Prejudice acting and speaking this way. Ever. Rather than creating this situation in Pride & Prejudice, the author would have been better off creating original characters in a similar setting. Hell, she pretty much did already and just slapped on the names Fitzwilliam Darcy, Charles Bingley and Elizabeth and Jane Bennet. Yes, they are that OOC.

I simply can't enjoy this book. If I could replace the characters names in my head I'd consider a higher rating. But when "Fitz" Darcy and Charles and Elizabeth are splashed across every page, I just can't take myself there.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
29 of 32 people found the following review helpful By Jeannie on February 2, 2010
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Disclaimer: I'm pretty flexible when it comes to P&P adaptions. I'm also not easily offended, and the reviews gave enough hints to the slash content that it didn't come as a surprise (nor, obviously, did it prevent me from purchasing). As long as the characters feel true, I'm willing to suspend disbelief and go along for the ride.

That being said, this book didn't click for me. To start with, I had trouble buying into one of the main premises of the plot - the idea that the widespread reaction of men and women in Regency times to the constraints on interactions with the opposite sex was to engage in relations with their own gender...not so much as a matter of preference, but more as a practical response to the options that were available. Characters are fooling around with each other willy nilly but it's not supposed to affect our view of their virtues (or vices). That was a big leap for me. Gay, straight or bi, a character's approach towards sex - be it hesitant, thoughtful, callous, or casual - says something to us about who they are.

Also, the flaws that Elizabeth believes Darcy possesses when they meet are merely the tip of the iceberg in this version. Instead of imagining Darcy's motivations through Elizabeth's eyes, we get to see and hear confirmation of his arrogance, jealousy, self-absorption and bitterness. (Did I mention that he's also shallow, unprincipled and incredibly selfish?)

The scene where Darcy finds Wickham holed up with Lydia in London and literally 'let's him have it' was the low point for me.
Read more ›
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
13 of 13 people found the following review helpful By LR on October 2, 2010
Format: Paperback
The main problem here isn't the fact that everyone is a natural born porn star ho / bi. No. If your reading this book, you assume that's going to be everpresent. My main issue is the horrible meanness applied to every simgle character--even Jane. Yes. Darcy nightly assaults Bingley-while he's asleep-with force. When Charles objects - Hell no!!! Darcy rape. Also, when he meets Wickham in London after Wickham runs off with the newly whorish Lydia, his main objective is to give him the ride of his life. And does. Hey, it's a book - but it does show that Darcy views sex as a very power-giving thing...

On to the Bennets. Luckily we don't ever learn of, say, Mr. Bennets forays with other men. This would be expected, given that every one in the Regency era did that kind of thing. Whatever. Jane gets annoyed with Lizzy, she has Huuuuge boobs, Lizzy is largely nice towards the beginning. But after she and Darcy marry and she produces an offspring, she is all 'meh' towards her daughter, seems to cringe whenever she looks at her, says that her daughter's wet nurse is more a mother to her than she is. Not even ruefully. Just factually. She doesn't even want kids, because it interupts her ability to have sex with Darcy anytime, anywhere. Towards the end - literally, like ten pages from it, she nonchalantly discusses new found ways to abort unwanted pregnancies with Jane, who is shocked. I just...don't see this from her. Ever.

Two little complaints. One, their is an obvious preference given to Mr. Bingley and Mr Darcy's illicet and inumerable 'nights together.' Fine. Whatever. However, there is no time given to CHarlotte and Lizzy. Just saying. This book was pegged to include her forbidden lovers too. Then Charlottes all, "Oh, I'm married Lizzy. No more!!
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
9 of 11 people found the following review helpful By Beth Massey on September 11, 2010
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I absolutely adored Pride/Prejudice. It was very Austenesque but with delightful erotic underpinnings. It was quite funny and paid reverential homage to JA's clever style. The sex of all flavors was hot, hot, hot - an excellent blend of just a soupçon of description mixed with wonderful naughty witticisms and humorous epigrams. As an example from page two: "He paid his forfeit with an alacrity bordering dangerously on enthusiasm." If Jane Austen had ever written an explicit scene, could she have said it better?

But let's get to the meat (pun intended) of what I really want to say. Many have written reviews that express horror that Pride/Prejudice's Darcy is portrayed as bisexual. Within P & P variations it seems to be easily accepted that he might be a werewolf, a vampire, a dragon, a ghost or a zombie hunter - but love a man - oh my, how gross! . I think the case for Darcy and Bingley being lovers, and that D has a past with Wickham as well as others of both sexes, plausible and much more probable than most Pride and Prejudice what-ifs.

Herendeen uses Austen's own words to make her case. Because of her thorough knowledge of the original source, I found no difficulty buying her premise. Darcy and Bingley are the only example of strong male friendship in all of Austen. Darcy is clearly written by Austen as a controlling mentor for his `particular' pal. In many ways they are an unlikely pair as best friends. They are not of the same class, they were not school chums and there is an age difference - not to mention Bingley has problematic sisters Darcy must endure in canon. JA Fan Fiction authors have often delved into why Darcy is so bent (pun intended) on protecting Bingley from Miss Bennet when he is not as diligent in protecting himself.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Most Recent Customer Reviews


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?