Priest - Kings of Gor [Paperback]

John Norman (Author)

Product Details

• Paperback: 318 pages
• Publisher: Tandam Publishing Ltd.; paperback / softback edition (1975)
• ISBN-10: 0426167740
• ISBN-13: 978-0426167747
• Product Dimensions: 7 x 4.4 x 1.3 inches
• Shipping Weight: 6.4 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (16 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #4,610,043 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

18 of 19 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Don't judge a book by its...reputation, September 25, 2000

By A Customer

This review is from: Priest-Kings of Gor: (#3) (Mass Market Paperback)

This is the first Gor book that I have read. I have known about them for decades but had dismissed them as trash without ever having read one because of their reputation for misogyny and the promotion of bondage. During a recent trip to a used book I came across a copy of Priest-Kings of Gor with a cover by Boris Vallejo that intrigued me. It showed a barbarian standing over a slave girl with what I took to be a golden idol of a gigantic insectoid creature in the background. (As it turned out, the "idol" was a living Priest-King!) I was in the mood for "guilty pleasure" so I bought it. I expected to get slam-bang action, lurid writing, a no-brainer story, and lots of politically incorrect pornography. Boy, was I wrong! The story has its share of action but it also has a fair amount of exposition and character development. The writing is far from lurid. It actually has a somewhat stilted feeling to it that I associate more with Victorian prose than with modern writing. The story was reasonably complex and the cultural background was surprisingly detailed. What impresses me most about this book, however, is the convincing presentation of an alien with a truly ALIEN perspective, the Priest-King of Gor, an intelligent creature whose sensorium is based on olfaction rather than vision. I've been reading science fiction for more than 40 years and I can't think of a book that has done it better. Oh, yeah, the bondage stuff. It's there but not as prominent as in the other Gor books, I'm told. And there is no pornography...whatever sex there is in this book (I don't remember any!) occurs offstage. Nevertheless, anyone with feminist views is advised to stay as far away from this book as possible. For everyone else it's a hell of a good read!

7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Cabot meets Priest-Kings and becomes their Emissary, December 25, 1998

By A Customer

This review is from: Priest-Kings of Gor (Paperback)

In this, the 3rd episode of the Counter-Earth saga, Tarl Cabot has determined to enter the forbidding Sardar mountains where the Priest-Kings, legendary rulers of Gor are believe to reside, and demand an accounting from them for the destruction of his beloved city Ko-Ro-Ba.

Cabot learns the true nature of Priest-Kings, and becomes enmeshed in their machinations as a not-unwilling paladin in a power struggle between factions of the Priest-Kings. He eventually learns of the reason for the destruction of Ko-Ro-Ba, and how his own choices may doom or save the Counter-Earth.

As of this writing, I just recently re-read this novel, and enjoyed just as much as the first time. Some may pooh-pooh Norman's writing as appealing only to adolescents, and deride his themes and pseudo-psychological theorizations as perverted or denigrating, but Norman's work is pure, unadulterated escapist fiction, where evil receives its just desserts, and you can lose yourself for a time.

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Audio version, December 17, 2010

By 

Kat at Fantasy Literature - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)   

This review is from: Priest-Kings of Gor (Gorean Saga Series) (MP3 CD)

I'm not sure why I'm still reading the Gor books. I guess it's partly because Brilliance Audio does such nice productions, but it's also largely because these books have been maligned for years as poorly written sexist-BDSM-erotica, so I can't help but want to see for myself before dismissing them as such. After finishing book 3, Priest-Kings of Gor, here's my take so far:

They are not poorly written. The quality of the writing is quite good except for the overuse of phrases such as "to my amazement," "to my surprise," "I found it strange that," "I marveled," "I was astonished," "I looked at him dumb-founded," "I was thunder-struck," etc. This may be more noticeable with the audio version, because the narrator, Ralph Lister, reads vivaciously, so these expressions of enthusiasm seem a little overdone. (But generally I appreciate Lister's spirit and recommend the audio version if you want to read the Gor books.)

The best aspect of the books, "to my surprise," is the world building. John Norman has created a fully detailed alternate world which is fun to explore. In Priest-Kings of Gor, we finally meet the Priest-Kings who rule the planet, and they are not at all what we were expecting. In fact, they're a different species altogether and Norman gives a lot of attention to their language, culture, sensory systems, and lifestyle. Personally, I found the Priest-Kings to be somewhat disturbing (I won't go into details so as not to spoil things), so I didn't enjoy spending so much time with them, but other readers are likely to feel differently.

The Gor books are not, so far, erotic. Yeah, there are beautiful scantily-clad pouty women in chains who are kneeling at Tarl Cabot's feet and claiming to be his pleasure slaves, but so far that's all they do. It's pretty silly, really. Which leads me to my next point:

Sexist? Yes -- but trying so hard not to be. And, unfortunately, this is where Gor goes wrong. It's too hard to take it seriously because mostly it just feels like a teenage boy's wet dream. That's because Tarl Cabot keeps talking like he's a feminist and denying that any woman is his slave, yet he keeps getting himself in these situations where he accidentally procures a female slave. These ladies are invariably beautiful and proud and are at first contemptuous, insolent, arrogant, and headstrong. Cabot admires their spirit and refuses to consider these wonderful humans to be slaves, but then two things happen:

1. He suspects them of treachery (while I'm wondering how they can be faithless if they're not his slaves) and uses this as an excuse to degrade them ("Be silent, slave!", "Wake up, wench!"), grab them by their hair and throw them around.
2. His refusal to use them as pleasure slaves insults them and makes them pout and demand to know if they're not pretty enough for him (my goodness, aren't they silly?).

The end result is that each slave girl becomes submissive and is soon begging to please him ("please, master!") and insisting that she loves him and wanted to wear his collar all along. Tarl, meanwhile, innocently insists that he doesn't understand.

After thinking about it for a while Tarl realizes that "every woman in her heart wants to wear the chains of a man" and that Gor is a man's world and that women rejoice in this. In Priest-Kings of Gor, he uses natural selection to explain that men have evolved to be courageous and aggressive and that women have evolved to be submissive because they need food and shelter and to be forced to reproduce. If they're too independent, they'll die before breeding. Thus, natural selection favors submissive women who want to belong to a man.

Those ideas are intriguing and I won't completely dismiss them out of hand, but then Cabot goes on to suggest that if a woman is grabbed by her hair, thrown down, and raped, she considers this "proof of her mate's regard" and the "expected culmination of her innate desire to be dominated." Cabot's evidence for this is our practice of giving a bride a wedding ring and carrying her over the threshold, which he suggests are analogous to bondage and rape, respectively.

I don't know a lot of women who are going to find these ideas acceptable or stimulating, but some do, and that's fine with me. The problem with the Gor books, though, is that they try to propound this idea while trying to make Tarl Cabot out to be a humanist (and specifically a feminist) at the same time, and that doesn't work. It just makes him sound like an idiot.

In one scene, a slave girl assigned to take care of him while he's in a particular room says she's hungry and Tarl (who has just met her and didn't know she hadn't eaten) curses himself for not thinking about the feelings "of a girl who must be protected and cared for." One minute later, she says something slightly snippy and he disciplines her by not letting her eat dinner. In fact, he's constantly flipping between spouting humanistic sentiments and announcing that a slave girl (who he says isn't his slave girl) needs discipline so she'll learn her place. Um... what place? It's no wonder he doesn't understand these women -- he can't even keep his own philosophies straight in his own head.

The whole thing would work better if Tarl Cabot found himself on this misogynist planet and, while being shocked at first, admitted and embraced the fact that all his puerile fantasies had come true and just went with it. Stop making excuses, Tarl. Stop accusing women of secretly wanting to be yelled at, bullied, thrown around, and raped. Gor is a man's world, so just shut up, get out your collars and chains, and have some fun, okay?