The Prime Minister: The Office and Its Holders Since 1945 [Hardcover]

Peter Hennessy (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: October 5, 2001 | ISBN-10: 0312293135 | ISBN-13: 978-0312293130 | Edition: 1

Analyzing the special chemistry of life in Number 10 Downing Street, Peter Hennessy scrutinizes what the Prime Minister actually does and the way that Cabinet government is run. He draws on unprecedented access to many of the leading politicians and also recently declassified, electrifying archival material. He illuminates Prime Ministerial attitudes towards, and authority over, such topics as nuclear weapons policy, the planning and waging of war, and foreign crises from Suez to the Falklands. He concludes with controversial assessments of each Prime Minister’s performance and outlines a new profile of the premiership for the 4th century.

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Written by a leading expert on British government (the author of Whitehall and other books), this should become the authoritative administrative history of the postwar British premiership. Hennessy examines the 11 postwar prime ministers, from Clement Attlee to Tony Blair, to illuminate the shifting power structures within the British government. Britain has no written constitution: thus, in H.H. Asquith's famous phrase, the job of prime minister "is what its holder chooses and is able to make of it." Hennessy is especially interested in the crucial relationship between the prime minister and the cabinet. Prime ministers have historically taken either a collaborative, consultative approach with their cabinets or a noncollaborative, "presidential" approach. In relation to issues of national security, the leaders have traditionally favored a less inclusive approach. This can be dangerous, as evidenced by Anthony Eden's handling of the 1956 Suez crisis. He entered into a secret agreement with France and Israel to retake the newly nationalized canal by force, but informed neither his cabinet nor his U.S. allies about his plans. Eden's secrecy led to Britain's worst humiliation of the postwar era: Eisenhower ordered him to turn back his troops, and Eden had no choice but to comply. So strong were the lessons of Suez that even the least collaborative postwar prime minister, Margaret Thatcher, learned them well. She constantly consulted her cabinet and the U.S. during the 1982 Falklands War. Tony Blair, Hennessy asserts, has increasingly used his cabinet for purposes of media "spin control" rather than policy deliberation. For those interested in the modern British government, this is must reading. Illus.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal

An award-winning scholar of British governing bodies, Hennessy (contemporary history, Queen Mary and Westfield Coll., Univ. of London; Whitehall) argues that the functions and powers of the prime minister should change to reflect the times. Using many interviews with senior politicians, Hennessy examines every prime minister since Churchill to view how they worked with Parliament and their own cabinets and how they dealt with emergencies and longer-term issues. Personality, not surprisingly, plays a huge role in success, as does the flow of information. In comparison to Gladstone, Tony Blair travels extensively, spends almost no time in the House, and personally writes and promotes almost no legislation. Hennessy suggests a permanent "inner cabinet" of rotating experts with access to sensitive information that would make the secretaries more responsive to daily politics, keep the prime minister from taking on power a secretary should wield, and otherwise reverse the recent trend toward the centralization of power with the PM. This readable but scholarly work would be best appreciated in academic collections. Robert Moore, Parexel Corp., Waltham, MA
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 688 pages
• Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan; 1 edition (October 5, 2001)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0312293135
• ISBN-13: 978-0312293130
• Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.6 x 2.2 inches
• Shipping Weight: 2.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,605,315 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars How Britain works, September 25, 2001

By 

Michael Albert Riccardi - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Prime Minister: The Office and Its Holders Since 1945 (Hardcover)

The unwritten UK Constitution is mysterious to Americans, but it also confounds the British themselves. Fortunately, Peter Hennessy is the essential guide to the inner workings of British institutions. I have read the British edition of "The Prime Minister" and can report that Mr. Hennessy has made sense of the inner workings of No. 10 Downing Street.

The jumping-off point for Mr. Hennessy is that the office of the PM has no formal job description. The free-form nature of the Prime Minister's office makes it a unique instrument of each premier's personality. The PM is the action center of UK democracy, and the premier's personal will and control of his or her party are the determining factor in just how much power the PM actually has at his or her disposal.

The checks on the potentially-vast powers of the Prime Minister (the electorate, the PM's party, and in rare cases the Monarch)are also outlined. Unexpected events like the Suez crisis or Profumo affair can limit the prime minister's power and even put the PM out of office, but successfully-managed events (such as the death of Princess Diana or the Falklands War) can enhance the PM's political standing immensely.

The best parts of the book are the sketches on each of the Prime Ministers who served since World War II. Many Americans have read biographies of Churchill and Thatcher, but Hennessy presents lively and substantive portraits of lesser-known but important figures such as Clement Attlee (the Labour PM who enacted the British welfare state) and Harold Macmillan (the Tory PM who acted as a mentor to JFK and thus played a crucial role in the Cold War).

There is some heavy-duty political science in the beginning chapters but the book is easily readable for anyone interested in the differences between American separation of powers and British-style parliamentary democracy.

0 of 2 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Chronicle of moral decline?, December 6, 2001

By 

Edward G. Nilges "Author, 'Build Your Own .Ne... (Hong Kong, China) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The Prime Minister: The Office and Its Holders Since 1945 (Hardcover)

British politics is a refreshing break from American politics. Today, as Peter Hennessy relates, Parliament is indeed a bear garden, but it is a garden of literate and witty bears, and not the merely ursine Trent Lott and Phil Gramm.

The unwritten British Constitution is an "oral" Constitution. As Tom Nairn has shown (in The Enchanted Glass) there is, for this reason, a dreamlike quality about procedures, and even a childlike autism shown in the interface of Number 10 and the Queen, wherein a great store is laid upon special boxes of magic papers.

It used to be endearing. However, as Tom Nairn and Norman Davies (The Isles) show, the unwritten British Constitution did not in actuality evolve time out of mind but instead in 1688 where it appears that the ruling elites of the Isles discovered a way of getting along with each other that involved carefully following norms, and strongly agreeng upon negative propositions, especially what sort of fellows did NOT constitute a proper player of the political game.

As a result, the boundaries of the British political system seem firm and unyielding to its participants and to American tourists; indeed the attraction to a certain sort of American mind is the attraction of what seems to be a closed system, "little England", free of French influenza or the clamor of competing interests here in the States.

But precisely as a result of the supposed unwritten nature of the British basic law, the boundaries do have a tendency to shift in an unseen (because undiscussed) way, much like North Carolina's Outer Banks, or the Fen Country.

Seismic changes occur in the British system in fits of absent-mindedness and are neither discussed nor properly recorded. For example, contrast the fact that in the period starting with the First World War and ending about 1990 with the Charles/Diana divorce.

In this period, Republicanism was unmentionable and Britons acted as if the constitutional Monarch was undiscussable and not replaceable, which (as Nairn shows) silenced a healthy 19th century British Republican tradition, in recent years under discussion again because of the savage treatment of Diana Spencer by the media.

Far more seriously and as Hennessy documents, the rules of the game have a tendency to change drastically as a result of the personal style of PMs. The signal case is that of Margaret Thatcher.

Systematically over-estimating her actual intellectual capabilities in the manner of the mid-level scientific worker Lady Thatcher showed that by giving deliberate offense, one could secure short-term advantage among the clubbable. That is, she entered a system dominated by upper-class males like Ted Heath whose combination of male chauvinism and chivalry had no way of dealing with simple lack of courtesy, amplified by media thugs.

In the 1980s, the worst sort of bounderism flowed unchecked through a channel dug by the 1979 winter of discontent. As an American observer I am forced to use British words coined in the pre-war years to describe strivers who take unfair advantage, and it seems that Thatcher opened a sort of bounder sluiceway through which previously checked energies (some benign and some malign) flowed into British life. This bounderism thought rather highly of itself as opposed to lazy sods in trade unions and Cambridge Apostles in MI5. But it seems to have been best at destruction, and Thatcher's own exclusion from public life in 1990 was, as Hennessy shows, payback by an Establishment that she "saved"...from any sort of nonsense including democracy, economic and political.

Hennessy's introductory chapters show that under George III the Prime Minister was truly only first among equals, not even able in some cases to sack other ministers. Perhaps this is the origin of the attractive tendency of the greatest to try to work as team members; their authority was never confirmed. This was by 1980 a power vacuum which Thatcher merely exploited. In light of her silly aphorisms (such as "there is no such thing as society") Margaret Thatcher was intellectually underqualified but introduced an era in which underqualified men and women (including John Major, Reagan, Blair, and both the elder and younger Bush) have been given a special pass if their ideology is conservative, whereas the truly qualified (Blair, Clinton, and Sen. McCain) achieve genuine results in the teeth of a drumbeat of opposition.

Characteristic of this opposition is the way it marshals false promises and true miseries among outsiders without, of course, letting them into the corridors of power. For example, it is absolutely astonishing here in the States that both Bushes have been able to steal formerly Democratic voters, because the policies of both create such misery among the rural white underclass. Thatcher coupled an unjustified pride in her own degree in sciences with a paradoxical contempt for university trained specialists who did not toe her party line, and appealed over their heads to a populace excluded from higher education by the class system. Thatcher replaced genuine bottom-up institutions such as the Greater London Council with a government of statistics and numerical objectives easily fudged by insiders, and unexplained to outsiders, which Blair has preserved.

The Most Tony has achieved his success only by transforming the PM into a sort of Presidential office, and he did so because he's aware that the New Tories will act like Thatcher to forestall a more gentlemanly regime, using media leaks, gossip and whatever else comes to mind including perhaps the Mace, to thwack the opposition upside the head. Number 10 has become the Beltway.

Unmentioned in this is the serious devolution of any ability for a British subject or American citizen to participate meaningfully in political affairs WITHOUT being coded as some sort of nut. Writers like Hennessy and observers of the Beltway are fond of describing, in a sort of insider's way, Inner Rings of power. These Inner Rings are naturalized. But the fact of their existence only means one thing to the ordinary slob; an increasing lack of access to the formulation of policy.

0 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Editor needed!, August 16, 2002

By 

Stanley Hauer (Hattiesburg, MS USA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The Prime Minister: The Office and Its Holders Since 1945 (Hardcover)

This promising and potentially important historical study is all but ruined by the author's inability to control his subject matter. There's no denying that Hennessy knows his stuff. What he *doesn't* know is how to write. In a phrase, this book is a mess. It rambles, wanders, and meanders through fifty years of history and politics. For most readers (certainly this one) the result is a series of anecdotes. I should add that an American edition should have included a glossary of political terms and abbreviations. All in all, a disappointing piece of work that promised so much.