Here are the 11 papers that forged the general and special theories of relativity: seven papers by Einstein, plus two papers by Lorentz and one each by Minkowski and Weyl. "A thrill to read again the original papers by these giants." — School Science and Mathematics. 1923 edition.
The Principle of Relativity (Dover Books on Physics)
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shop the Amazon.com Textbooks Store and save up to 70% on textbook rentals, 90% on used textbooks and 60% on eTextbooks. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
More About the Author
Albert Einstein (1879-1955) was born in Germany and became an American citizen in 1940. A world-famous theoretical physicist, he was awarded the 1921 Nobel Prize for Physics and is renowned for his Theory of Relativity. In addition to his scientific work, Einstein was an influential humanist who spoke widely about politics, ethics, and social causes. After leaving Europe, Einstein taught at Princeton University. His theories were instrumental in shaping the atomic age.
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
40 of 42 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Of course this is a five-star book: it contains two of the most
important scientific documents of all time! It is, of course, not a book for beginners: the very Planck, who was the editor of the Annalen der Physik, where the German originals were published, had to ask for explanations a few times, in order to grasp the meaning of the "Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies". The teaching of relativity is now done in a rather different way, emphasizing, from the beginning, the 4-dimensional picture, as in Taylor-Wheeler's "Spacetime physics". Einstein's paper is on a modification of electrodynamics to make it agree with the tenets of relativity (the particular inertial frame being used is of no effect at all). In order to do that he finds it necessary to change mechanics, and actually the very basic concepts of mechanics. In contrast, the great paper on general relativity "Foundations of general relativity" has pedagogical preocupations, and is quite readable, including an interesting introduction to tensors which clearly shows that, master of the physics of the problem, Einstein was a novice at the mathematics of it. This book is a treasure. There are also papers by Lorentz, Poincare' and others. Great fun. But, learn your relativity first!
important scientific documents of all time! It is, of course, not a book for beginners: the very Planck, who was the editor of the Annalen der Physik, where the German originals were published, had to ask for explanations a few times, in order to grasp the meaning of the "Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies". The teaching of relativity is now done in a rather different way, emphasizing, from the beginning, the 4-dimensional picture, as in Taylor-Wheeler's "Spacetime physics". Einstein's paper is on a modification of electrodynamics to make it agree with the tenets of relativity (the particular inertial frame being used is of no effect at all). In order to do that he finds it necessary to change mechanics, and actually the very basic concepts of mechanics. In contrast, the great paper on general relativity "Foundations of general relativity" has pedagogical preocupations, and is quite readable, including an interesting introduction to tensors which clearly shows that, master of the physics of the problem, Einstein was a novice at the mathematics of it. This book is a treasure. There are also papers by Lorentz, Poincare' and others. Great fun. But, learn your relativity first!
28 of 30 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
This is a collection of the original papers that led to the principle of relativity.
The book gives excellent insight as to how and why the theory was developed. It clearly shows how the theory better explains certain parts of our universe.
The only drawback is that the mathematical level may cause the book to be unapproachable to many. I reccommend at least one year of Calculus if you intend to understand the works fully. Without such a background the book is difficult at best, but still rewarding.
If you lack this background you might be better served by reading Einsteins Relativity, the first book in the list above of what purchasers of this book also bought.
Nonetheless I agree with the School Science and Mathematics review,"It is really a thrill to read again the original papers by these giants."
20 of 21 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Reading the original papers would be best, but if you don't read German then the Dover collection is the next best thing. In the paper on special relativity, the Lorentz transformations are derived via formulating and solving a first order pde, a treatment that no textbook presents (first order pdes aren't taught in math physics, in spite of the fact that every set of first order autonomous odes generates a first order pde). It took my teaching the subject to advanced undergrads in later years to realize what many others have by now noticed, namely, you don't need two postulates for special relativity. "Galilean invariance" is enough. The constancy of the speed of light follows from the requirement that there is no special reference frame.
Einstein's presentation of GR is unsurpassed for conciseness and clarity, is a model for other researchers to follow when writing papers. Here, he introduces the famous misconception (corrected today in the better texts like Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler) that general covariance is a physical principle. Well, even the greatest minds make mistakes.
Feynman wrote well, but no scientist to date has written better than Einstein.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
Covariant Tensor Multiplied by the Square Root of Heart
The key to reading these essays, for people who didn't major in physics, at least, is to not get caught up on the learning curve. Read more
Published 2 months ago by W. Hamilton
5.0 out of 5 stars
Principle of Relativity.
With the end of the Ether Theory, and fixed reference frames in the universe, all motion had to be considered "Relative" (and reciprocal) to the participants. Read more
Published 3 months ago by derck a. gordon
4.0 out of 5 stars
An interesting book for someone well versed in 19th century physics
This book contains a collection of 11 papers, seven of which were written by Einstein, with the rest written by H.A. Lorentz, H. Minkowski and H. Read more
Published on June 17, 2010 by Colorado Metallurgist
2.0 out of 5 stars
The Principle of Relativity
I'm not happy with this book at all. I'm not a scientist outside of the field of information technology and I want something to explain Einstein's theories that I could read. Read more
Published on March 21, 2008 by S. Thomas Adelstein
4.0 out of 5 stars
The Principle of Relativity
This book presents Einstein's orginal papers on relativity along with many other "classics" on the subject. A good understanding of college math and physics is a must.
Published on December 28, 2007 by Charles H. Buell
5.0 out of 5 stars
A History of Relativity
Dover must be commended for re-printing this collection of 'seminal' papers which cover the development of Relativity. Read more
Published on December 15, 2006 by Roshan Kamath
5.0 out of 5 stars
High school maths needed
One of the truly amazing things about the Special Theory is that you only need a decent grasp of high school mathematics and science to fully understand the two original papers. Read more
Published on November 2, 2006 by J. MOLDOVAN
5.0 out of 5 stars
An accessible reference book
This compact collection of English translations of the original papers is a cheap and highly accessible reference book. Read more
Published on July 17, 2003 by "jayjina"
5.0 out of 5 stars
A colection of classical articles
This book is not for the usual reader, it contains many articles from the beginning of the 20th century in physics that are now classics. Read more
Published on March 1, 2003 by PAULO V S ALVES
5.0 out of 5 stars
THE Classic
I do not know how I can adequately review this. That this is indispensible to any theoretical physicist is pretty much the extent of what I am about to say. Read more
Published on February 26, 2003 by Derek Lee
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Listmania!
|
|
