Buy Used
Used - Good See details
$0.03 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Prophets: Who They Were, What They Are
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Prophets: Who They Were, What They Are [Hardcover]

Norman Podhoretz (Author)
3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Textbook Student FREE Two-Day Shipping for Students. Learn more

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback $24.99  
Unknown Binding $30.00  

Book Description

0743219279 978-0743219273 October 29, 2002
A radical reinterpretation of the biblical prophets by one of America's most provocative critics reveals the eternal beauty of their language and the enduring resonance of their message.

Long before Norman Podhoretz became one of the intellectual leaders of American neoconservatism, he was a student of Hebrew literature and a passionate reader of the prophets of the Old Testament. Returning to them after fifty years, he has produced something remarkable: an entirely new perspective on some of the world's best-known works.

Or, rather, three new perspectives. The first is a fascinating account of the golden age of biblical prophecy, from the eighth to the fifth century B.C.E., and its roots in earlier ages of the ancient Israelite saga. Thus, like large parts of the Bible itself, "The Prophets" is a history of the Near East from the point of view of a single nation, covering not only what is known about the prophets themselves -- including Elijah, Amos, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel -- but also the stories of King David, King Saul, and how the ancient Israelites were affected by the great Near Eastern empires that surrounded them. Layered into this work of history is a piece of extraordinary literary criticism. Podhoretz's very close reading of the verse and imagery used by the biblical prophets restores them to the top reaches of the poetic pantheon, for these books contain, unequivocally, some of the greatest poetry ever written.

The historical chronicle and the literary criticism will transport readers to a time that is both exotic and familiar and, like any fine work of history or literature, will evoke a distinct and original world. But the third perspective of "The Prophets" is that of moral philosophy, and it serves to bring the prophets' message into the twenty-first century. For to Norman Podhoretz, the real relevance of the prophets today is more than the excitement of their history or the beauty of their poetry: it is their message. Podhoretz sees, in the words of the biblical prophets, a war being waged, a war against the sin of revering anything made by the hands of man -- in short, idolatry. In their relentless battle against idolatry, Podhoretz finds the prophets' most meaningful and enduring message: a stern warning against the all-consuming worship of self that is at least as relevant in the twenty-first century as it was three thousand years ago.

"The Prophets" will earn the respect of biblical scholars and the fascinated attention of general readers; its observations will be equally valued by believers and nonbelievers, by anyone with spiritual yearnings. Learned, provocative, and beautifully written, "The Prophets" is a deeply felt, deeply satisfying work that is at once history, literary criticism, and moral philosophy -- a tour de force.


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

In what initially appears to be a radical departure from his previous eight books, some of which were autobiographical accounts of Podhoretz's move from left to right, this effort deals with the Hebrew prophets, a new subject for the former editor of Commentary magazine. To his credit, he does indeed present a scholarly analysis of the prophets, but it is interwoven with too many references to himself. Moreover, the lessons that Podhoretz derives from his study of the prophets, as detailed in the last chapter, "The Prophets and Us," are a rehash of the neo-conservative views expressed in his other books. He condemns relativism, the counterculture, political correctness, the women's movement, deconstructionism, multiculturalism and environmentalism. He likens his own views to those of the biblical prophets as they fought for monotheism and opposed paganism. Podhoretz gives consideration to all 21 prophetic books in the Bible, as well as to Abraham and Moses. However, he focuses mostly on Amos, Hosea, Micah, Isaiah ("First" and "Second"), Jeremiah and Ezekiel. He examines their writings, drawing extensively on the work of biblical scholars. Although he describes himself as an "amateur" and a "non-specialist," he doesn't hesitate to give his opinions on disputes among the various schools of biblical interpreters. Podhoretz deserves to be applauded for venturing beyond himself (at least in part) as the subject of his books, but readers interested in the prophets may wish to consult scholarly sources directly rather than rely on Podhoretz's rendering of their ideas.
Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal

The former editor of Commentary and a contributor to the National Review and the Wall Street Journal, Podhoretz steps away from the political writing for which he is noted to address the prophets of the Old Testament. Writing with a deep appreciation of the Bible, he provides an analysis and commentary that brings the prophets to life. He starts by describing the biblical setting and ends with a chapter that relates the prophets and their messages to the contemporary period. The specific prophets whom he considers are Amos, Hosea, Micah, First Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Second Isaiah. Each chapter describes the prophet's message, historical and social context, and religious setting through narrative and both biblical and scholarly quotes. Written for lay readers and students, this book is especially appropriate for public and academic libraries serving patrons interested in the acquisition of biblical commentaries by contemporary and/or popular authors as well as religious scholars. (Index not seen.)-Naomi Hafter, Baltimore
Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 400 pages
  • Publisher: Free Press (October 29, 2002)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0743219279
  • ISBN-13: 978-0743219273
  • Product Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.4 x 1.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #441,039 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

11 Reviews
5 star:
 (6)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.9 out of 5 stars (11 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

19 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A Rare Contribution to Public Understanding of the Bible, November 16, 2004
By 
This review is from: The Prophets: Who They Were, What They Are (Hardcover)
I'm giving Podhoretz' book five stars not because I agree with everything he says, but because he has made a rare contribution here in writing a book with is scholarly enough to be of use to those who want to understand the Hebrew Bible, yet with a style that makes it accessible to the general public.

Most widely read books on the Bible are written for people who assume a certain paradigm, either conservative or liberal, and they mainly reinforce the beliefs of the reader without discussing alternatives to underlying premises. Not so Podhoretz. Although he is in a sense a "believer," he states firmly in the beginning that he is not a fundamentalist, and this is clear in his methodology. For example, Podhoretz accepts that some sections of some biblical books were not written by their purported authors, especially in regard to Isaiah, but takes the approach that if Isaiah was written by three or more authors over three centuries, we should still look at what they have to say. He also rejects the idea that prophets are foretellers, and notes several instances where he believes they got prophecies wrong.

Podhortez' main thesis is that the prophets were warriors of the word, struggling against paganism, and that the prophetic period came to an end because they won - paganism was no longer widely accepted among Israelites, so prophets were not needed. In terms of modern application, Podhoretz argues that just as idolatry was a form of self-worship, man worshipping the products of his own hand, the prophets are relevant to us today becuase so much of our society is built around forms of self-worship.

Podhoretz' secondary thesis is more academic - he again and again attempts to refute the idea that the prophets abandoned the ritual emphaisis of the Mosaic law. This is sort of an anti-evolutionary argument; he argues that the prophets did not change the substance of their message so much as their emphasis. As circumstances changed and the Israelites became more infatuated with foreign gods, the prophets focused more on that threat, emphsizing that ritual observance was of no value to God without purity of heart.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


21 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent book, March 28, 2003
By 
J WICKEY (PLYMOUTH, MICHIGAN United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Prophets: Who They Were, What They Are (Hardcover)
I have been reading the writings of Norman Podhoretz for about twenty years and find him consistently rewarding. This book, which seems meant for the general reading public, is no different. Though I do not have the technical expertise to evaluate his elucidation of the prophets, this book provided a perspective that was very helpful to me. It will give my reading of the books of the Old Testament a remewed focus of interest. His concluding chapter is particularly well written, well reasoned and enlightening, even prophetic. He might have spoken louder.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Read, Pretty Good Theology, January 19, 2007
This review is from: The Prophets: Who They Were, What They Are (Hardcover)
I really enjoyed Podhoretz's book on the prophets, but I think ultimately he's a better Biblical historian and story teller than he is a theologian (which isn't to say he isn't doing good work when he delves into theology). Still, a lot of what he said makes sense and his positions are extremely well argued and powerful if not wholly persuasive. I can see why some Christian reviewers were left with somewhat of a bad taste in their mouth, because Podhoretz's position (despite occasional protestations that he's writing for all readers of any philosophical or religious persuasion) is ultimately quite Judeo-centric. But what do you expect? He is, after all, a religious Jew. And more power to him, I say. I WANTED to get an outside perspective. Where I agreed, I agreed a lot, where I disagreed I acknowledged the strength of his point of view. I ultimately became convinced that the 'evolutionary' theory of prophetic religion is probably overstated, but I think Podhoretz errs too much the other direction. Is there no innovation in the Classical Prophets? I think Podhoretz is not focusing enough on the role their religious imagination plays and already assumes from the outset that there is some systematic theology at work here. There obviously is SOME kind of theology, his case for that is clear, but I don't think its all as coherent as he seems to think it is. Sometimes he makes moves that irked me, like his denial of Jonah as belonging to the classical prophets. He does this because Jonah is a story about a prophet whereas ALL of the other classical prophets (Daniel isn't considered a classical prophet by Podhoretz either) are not writing stories so much as prounouncing God's Will and Plan. Podhoretz points out that this story hearkens back to the kinds of stories that he examined concerning the pre-classical prophets. BUT he goes to great lengths and gives fantastic arguments in the book that there IS NO strict bifurcation between the pre-classical prophets and their classical decendents. So why should we think that this harkening back somehow precludes Jonah from fitting in that tradition in toto? So whereas Jonah would prove a real problem for some of his central theses about the lack of real innovation in the prophetic period he just removes Jonah from the picture rather than really trying to examine what the thinker represents. What's really important about Jonah's place is that those who placed Jonah IN the canon DID consider him a prophet and so whatever systematic prophetic theology was developed at the time that the canon started to take shape certainly thought he fit into the whole picture. However you can even learn from Podhoretz's mistake here. Because it sheds a big light on how important this so-called minor prophet really is to Christianity and theology as a whole.

Another problem is that while I think Podhoretz makes a good case that the classic bifurcation of prophet and priest is overstated, I think he once again goes to far the other direction. There does seem to be a tension between various groups within the Hebrew community: prophet, priest, and king. You see it when David eats the food in the temple, or even between court prophets and itinerant prophets in 1 Kings. He touches on Micaiah but never really examines the Jehosaphat in that story. You might want to look at Reinhold Niebuhr's examination of that story in BEYOND TRAGEDY to understand why I think Podhoretz should've focused on it more. I think it enlightens some of the other tensions you see between various groups throughout the Bible. None of this is really given serious consideration.

A final big problem is with his examination of the suffering servant. I just think he misses the overall here, but this review is long enough as it is. Again, I'd suggest BEYOND TRAGEDY to get a better handle that Podhoretz gives. His suggestion that there is no vicarious suffering in the OT just seems ad hoc to me, and he gives no real argument for it. I think that the whole story he is telling reveals a God that is allowing people to be harmed so that they can be turned into His light for the world. The Jews are being made to suffer to prepare them for the saving work God will work through them for the world. In a roundabout way, that itself is an example of vicarious suffering in the OT. The Suffering servant, whether a premonition about Christ or a symbol for the the suffering the Jews endure or both (I've never bought the idea that Third Isaiah is talking about himself and I'm surprised Podhoretz did, again without the usual argumentative support) is a revelation that suffering love is in some sense the meaning of history. Whether intentionally or unintentionally the writer has touched that oh so important vein. Podhoretz really never reflects on any of this and I thought more about these kinds of views could've been said.

But on a number of issues Podhoretz gets a lot right, gives some dynamite history, and generally argues rigorously and effectively for his positions, which is a treat that is too rare in theology. What's more he makes the Bible come alive in a way few writers can. Sure he gets things wrong, and yes he tends to give a less than thorough account of opposition arguments, and again of course he has a Judeo-centric worldview. But forget about all that. This is a must read for anyone who is interested in the prophets and the old testament in general. I loved it and I think you will to. Just remember that its not the end-all and be-all. Read all perspectives, then make up your own mind.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews









Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
First Sentence:
IN SPEAKING OF CLASSICAL PROPHECY as a mysterious phenomenon at both ends of its three-hundred-year course, I also suggested that Amos and those who followed in his footsteps neither materialized out of nowhere nor eventually vanished into thin air. Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
other classical prophets, putting other gods, war against idolatry, last eleven chapters, classical prophecy, thine abominations, ancestral glory, anonymous prophet, rebellious house, prophetic literature, mine inheritance
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
First Isaiah, Hebrew Bible, Second Isaiah, Northern Kingdom, God of Israel, Former Prophets, First Zechariah, God Himself, Second Book of Kings, End of Days, Southern Kingdom, Ten Commandments, Second Zechariah, High Priest, Kingdom of Israel, First Book of Samuel, Kingdom of Judah, Second Book of Samuel, New Testament, Old Testament, Jerusalem Bible, Moshe Greenberg, Near East, Holy One of Israel, John Bright
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:




What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Discussion Replies Latest Post
Am I the only person who hates religion more everyday? 2546 8 seconds ago
Part II: Call for Reform in the Catholic Church: Why and what is needed to effect much needed change! 6575 26 seconds ago
God's People was and is and will be forever "Israel" (Literal and Spiritual" 12 59 seconds ago
Historical evidence for ANY supernatural events occuring on the Earth? 143 8 minutes ago
Why do Haredim Target the Modern Orthodox? 48 1 day ago
"The Recent Complex Creation" 262 1 day ago
I just received a "very good" textbook without its disc - what are your thoughts? 168 1 day ago
Never buy school textbooks. Download them to your reading device or computer 3 4 days ago
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums



So You'd Like to...



Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject