Customer Reviews

Puccini: Turandot

5 star:		(18)
4 star:		(4)
3 star:		(4)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(2)

 

 

There are many compelling aspects of this set, most obviously, the unique Turandot that Callas portrays. Although her voice was certainly not what it was prior to 1950, she is far above average vocally (with the exception of the occasional strained top note---believe it or not, these actually add to the charm of the Callas Turandot) and her acting is comparable in my mind to the 1953 Tosca; her character is fiery, forceful and chilly, yet gut-wrenchingly sad and vulnerable, almost like a little girl in some spots. The transformation from a frozen "princess of death" to a princess warm and passionately in love is a gradual one and is very affective. She holds her own (contrary to what the amazon.com reviewer said) in the horribly difficult Act II, Scene II, although following "In questa reggia" (which is extremely poignant and well sung) her voice sounds a little bit haggard and thin as she poses the riddles to Calaf.

As for the rest of the cast: Fernandi delivers a perfectly satisfactory Calaf. I am VERY picky when it comes to tenors, and think no tenor of this century even comes close to Bjoerling as Calaf, but as for the rest of them, Fernandi does well, and is most compelling in the last act. His "Nessun dorma" leaves something to be desired, but once again, I probably think so because I'm comparing his version to the Bjoerling version which beats them all.

Schwarzkopf is a wonderfully tender and tragic Liu, although a tiny bit shrill when she sings above a piano level. Her "Signore, ascolta" is comparable to the Cabelle version in my opinion (especially the last bar of the piece---it brings a tear to the eye).

Serafin is, well, Serafin, and I can't really say anything to do him justice. He holds everything together with artistry and his conducting is as chilly (yet flaming) as Callas' singing. He was certainly one of the greats.

So, in conclusion, get this recording. Although Callas' voice is not 'fat' in this version, it is not only acceptable, but very unique and touching.

This is a unique recording. It offers a rather specialized view of Turandot which, despite some vocal compromises, is the most emotionally involving performance on disc. To my mind, opera is first and foremost about drama, and this reading has that in spades. I think it deserves a place in every Puccinian's CD library, alongside the equally effective, but very different, Nilsson/Corelli/Scotto set under Molinari-Pradelli.

Serafin offers a slower, weightier and far more detailed account of this work's extraordinary orchestral part, whereas Molinari-Pradelli is faster and more straightforward. For me, this dichotomy is a bit like comparing Furtwangler and Weingartner in Beethoven's 9th: two very different but equally valid approaches that are both true to the work's spirit. Serafin is entirely in sync with the more humanistic view of the characters given by his vocalists. Callas is not, to my ears, the ultimate "ice princess" but rather a deeply conflicted, lonely and repressed young woman caught in a role that was defined for her rather than by her. The Liu of Schwarzkopf is, for me, far more touchingly pathetic than the norm (Serafin gives her tremendous support), and Fernandi, despite limited vocal resources, is an unusually lyrical and ardent Everyman: his Calaf is presented on a more human level than the Olympic-sized hero we usually hear.

Just as Serafin is ideal for a more probing and intimate view of this opera's characters, Molinari-Pradelli's brisker, more exuberant portrayal is perfectly in accord with the grander, more broadly brushed canvas provided by his stars. Nilsson's may be a blander characterization than that of Callas - but she is surely more of an "ice princess," with vocal stamina and range to match. Likewise Corelli's stentorian - and breathtaking - Calaf is a larger than life figure of super-hero proportions. So, in a nutshell, each conductor provides a well-nigh ideal backdrop for their respectively very different conceptions.

Callas valiantly hurdles many of the imposing vocal challenges of her role - and on those terms is not entirely successful. But what is it about that slightly tremulous and edgy voice that elicits such immediate sympathy? I can only say that she has this listener by the throat all the way - following her with a libretto, I am continually astonished at her ability to color words and whole phrases with a plaintive nobility and barely concealed anguish that are utterly gripping. She is, for me, one of those rare and supreme artists who somehow manage to make technical limitations more of an asset than a liability. It makes perfect sense therefore that she would be paired with a Fernandi, who in his own way is truly excellent (despite some near-shouting up top) - he simply isn't a Bjorling or a Corelli (but who else was?). Schwarzkopf is an artist about whom I am very ambivalent - I can remember too many occasions where her fluttery, self-conscious coquetry really drove me up the wall (e.g., much of her Mozart). But for some reason I can't quite put my finger on, here she is the only Liu who brings tears to my eyes every time I hear her (unlike Caballe and Tebaldi).

By contrast, Nilsson and Corelli succeed in terms of sheer physical prowess - egad, what a larger than life Riddle Scene! I am generally far more of an admirer of Bjorling than I am of Corelli - but, unfortunately Bjorling's Calaf (with Leinsdorf) was caught at the very end of his career, whereas Corelli here was at the very peak of his (his constant scooping into high notes CAN be annoying - but when he does get there it's invariably dead center and VERY exciting).

At the risk of sounding totally equivocal, I would have to say that owning BOTH sets, which are mutually complementary and both very satisfying in their very different ways, is the best way to go.

Still, if the desert island beckoned and I could have just one recording of this Puccini masterpiece, then Callas & Co. would have to go there with me.

Great interpretation of Turandot for Callas. Her intense declamation gives her performance an imperious power, as she offers not only the ice of the character, but the fire which Turandot tells us burns beneath. In other words, we listen a more layered Turandot than other great singers have chosen to reveal. The fullnes of her phrasing, and the insinuations of her low notes, give to the character the correct dimensions. Is an human and fascinating Turandot. Tullio Serafin conducts this opera masterly, with a lot of colors, and great expression. The rest of the cast sing very well, and in a refined way. Giuseppe Nessi (the emperor Altoum) was the first Pang in the very first performance of all, at La Scala under Toscanini, on April 26, 1926.

This is a wonderful presentation of Puccini;s last opera. The Oriental mood of this piece is beautifully illustrated by the La Scala orchestra under the veteran Tullio Serafin. The chorus, so important in this opera, is yet another credit to what La Scala was able to produce in the 1950'. The two leading sopranos, are, of course, well worth discussing and hearing. Elisabeth Schwarzkopf contributes a Liu of utmost beauty and lyricism, and I count it as one of her most exquisite performances on records. Eugenio Fernandi does as well with his role of the Unknown Prince as one would have expected at that time. He gets through the music respectably, and his voice takes on a sunny color near the end of the opera which is, I suppose, appropriate. The Turandot of Maria Callas, is, I guess, the reason why this set is still thriving, despite it's other positive attributes. Callas launched the beginning of her career by singing this opera in several opera houses in Europe. Her voice at the time was a mammoth-sized torrent of sound. She stopped singing Turandot in 1950, and never returned to it until this recording was done in 1957. The voice was now smaller, less powerful, more wiry, and considerably less steady than before. No matter, because she creates a highly individual Turandot with a myriad of vocal color. There are a few wayward top notes, but nothing horrendous. Callas aside, this is a very good recording, and the remastered sound has improved the sonics tremendously. I would recommend this recording, though no one could be blamed for prefering the London or RCA recordings.

Callas is great here, and the reccording as a whole is good. Guys, "Turandot" is a fairy-tale. It's not real like Madama Butterfly and Tosca. Just listen to the beautiful music, and to Callas' "In Questa Reggia." Stunning. (In fact, if you're a real Callas fan, lip-synch with her follwing the libretto, you'll see why she was great!)

This Turandot shows the highly dramatic Callas in a role made for her metallic, majestic timbre. She sounds amazing as the icy princess whom only true love can melt. If only Corelli had partnered her and the sublime Schwarzkopf we could have had the Turandot of the century. Other Turandots to cherish are Borkh, Turner and Nilsson. I never liked Sutherland as Turandot.

Five stars and more!!!!!! The most dramatic, enchanting Turandot on disc. I love Nilsson and Borkh as well. But Callas and Schwarzkopf are just superb!!!

Maria Callas sang Turandot in 1948 and 1949 with great success in Italy and South-America.The 49-live recording of her performance in Buenos Aires is amazing.Unfortunately,Callas'studio-recording was produced too late. It's true,in 1957 Callas' voice was too small for a dramatic role like Turandot, but there is still this incredible dramatic imagination that creates a living picture of Turandot's character.To be honest,this is a recording for fans like me,because we can excuse the vocal problems of our idol.
I already recommended Sutherlands fantastic Turandot,it's perfect.
The best Callas-Puccini recordings are Tosca (1953)and Madama Butterfly (1955).I also recommend the Callas-Puccini-recital of 1954 (with one of the most convincing performances of Turandot's aria).

I read all the reviews in this page and hoped for some reason and some musical criticism but as usual with Amazon the negative "reviews" are nothing except insipid, bottom-showing crap. One even plagiarised an entire review from somebody else. One can see how much hatred great talent can provoke. Then the bashing is written in awful grammar and unmusical nonsense is sold as the "truth". If Callas' voice HAD been "weak" and "thin" she could hardly have performed Aida, Tosca, Brünnhilde, Isolde, Kundry and Turandot to great critical acclaim. This Turandor really "bursts with colour" as another reviewer wrote. Schwarzkopf, ever intelligent and idiomatic, redeemed the lovely role of Liu of all the verismo-mannerisms that had plagued it before. Callas, in 1957 her voice was in beautiful shape though not as tough as it used to be, creates the most insightful, impressive Turandot that doesn't merely blow out her guts but shows feeling and emotion to. Listen how she phrases the word "Amore" and be floored by such beauty. Fernandi might not be a Corelli but I found his Prince to be very charming and truly heart-warming. Serafin conducts Puccini to perfection, nobody ever did it as well as he, who had witnessed Puccini himself. Two thumbs up indeed!

Every voice in this recording is special and excels far beyond anyone else who has recorded this opera! It's the perfect combination of drama, theater and innovative composing on the part of Puccini which I have never in 40 years heard matched by any other group of artists.