Buy New
$9.67
Qty:1
  • List Price: $13.00
  • Save: $3.33 (26%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 8 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Q.E.D.: Beauty in Mathema... has been added to your Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Q.E.D.: Beauty in Mathematical Proof (Wooden Books) Hardcover – May 1, 2004

ISBN-13: 978-0802714312 ISBN-10: 0802714315 Edition: 0th

Buy New
Price: $9.67
45 New from $5.98 50 Used from $2.55
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$9.67
$5.98 $2.55
Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Frequently Bought Together

Q.E.D.: Beauty in Mathematical Proof (Wooden Books) + The Golden Section: Nature's Greatest Secret (Wooden Books) + Ruler and Compass: Practical Geometric Constructions (Wooden Books)
Price for all three: $28.91

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: Wooden Books
  • Hardcover: 64 pages
  • Publisher: Walker & Company (May 1, 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0802714315
  • ISBN-13: 978-0802714312
  • Product Dimensions: 6.8 x 5.8 x 0.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (17 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #37,829 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Burkard Polster is a mathematician at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia. His previous books include The Mathematics of Juggling and The Geometrical Picture Book.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
5 star
13
4 star
1
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
2
See all 17 customer reviews
Very nice visual demonstrations for a number of theorems.
Hop and Mop David
The proof, albeit more complicated than all proofs in this book, Q.E.D., was still unexpectedly simpler.
Alok Govil
First let me point out that this is one of about 35 excellent "Little Gems" published by Wooden Books.
J. Guild

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

66 of 67 people found the following review helpful By Mathsguy on April 8, 2005
Format: Hardcover
Sigh! Unlike the reviewer pond-jumper, I have actually read "QED", in the proper sense. In fact, I have proofread it. Being a colleague of the author, I am hardly an unbiased reviewer, and though I regard "QED" as a gem of a book, the potential buyer needn't accept my opinion. Please peek inside "QED" to judge for yourselves.

What I would like to do is to address pond-jumper's criticisms of "QED". To begin, he (it's gotta be a he) objects to the author's characterisation of a mathematical proof. pond-jumper doesn't specify his worry here, but it is fair enough to be concerned or confused over exactly what constitutes a mathematical proof: mathematicians and philosophers have been debating this for thousands of years, and there is plenty of room for disagreement. The approach in "QED" is to avoid the pedantry, to emphasise the clear, intuitive ideas at the heart of some mathematical theorems. As such, the book does not contain completely rigorous proofs, with the last I's and T's dotted and crossed. But the arguments are clear and convincing (and beautiful), AND the arguments are correct: the mathematicians/pedants CAN easily fill in the details if they so wish. There is no sleight of hand in "QED", no "professor's trick".

pond-jumper's substantive complaint is that the author's proof that .9999999... = 1 is incorrect. In fact, the author is absolutely correct; I will briefly explain how pond-jumper has led himself astray.

Any use of infinity is problematic, prone to confusion, and infinite decimals are no exception: in high school (and, sadly, often at university), the difficulties are simply ignored. Here, the question is, what happens to .999...999... when it is multiplied by 10? The author (correctly) claims the result is 9.999...999...
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
21 of 21 people found the following review helpful By Alok Govil on September 12, 2006
Format: Hardcover
If you feel that you have lost the touch of history of mathematics, have lost your creativity into the rigour of formal methods, and need integral calculus to solve simplest of the mathematical problems, this is the book you need.

Q.E.D. is a compilation of ancient mathematical problems with unexpectedly short mathematical proofs, which one you know them, are as simple as they can be, yet you may not think of them by yourself.

My idea is to train (or re-train) my mind with that creative thought with which you can find elegant proofs to mathematical problems rather than resorting to differential equations at each point. This book is just great on that.

I could work myself through half of the book in about two days. So thought-provoking is the content that I ended up proving a few theorems myself that were not included in the book. (Yet I see a simpler proof of one of them later in the book!)

I wish this book included five times more material than what it has. I wish to have all of mathematics to be taught in this fashion. Had once encountered a problem from electromagnetism that I could not even start on, finally gave up and continued reading the Feynman lectures on Physics (vol 2) to see the proof. The proof, albeit more complicated than all proofs in this book, Q.E.D., was still unexpectedly simpler.

I wish for a book like Q.E.D. that teaches me a lot more mathematics. But this is not to say that Q.E.D. hasn't served the purpose it aimed for.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful By Gary on August 28, 2005
Format: Hardcover
I like just about everything about this little book. There are a couple of other books on pictorial proofs out there (The Most Beautiful Mathematical Formulas by Salem et. al. and Proofs without Words by Nelson), but this one is by far the most visually appealing. I particularly like the beautiful etching-like illustrations which, in my opinion, capture the timeless beauty of the various proofs very well.

Included in the book is a nice mix of well-known and not so well-known material. For example, many people will know the nifty pizza proof that relates the circumference of the circle with its area, but it is probably quite a pleasant surprise for many that a similar relationship exists between the surface of a sphere and its volume.

B.t.w., and if you have also read the other reviews this may surprise you, I really did read most of the book.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Hardcover
Q. E. D. is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase "Quod erat demonstrandum", which means, "what had to be proved." In this book, Polster demonstrates 23 simple "proofs" of fundamental mathematical principles. I enclose the word proof in quotes because they are not always rigorous in the mathematical sense. In some cases they are more in the area of reasonably convincing reasoning.

Some examples are:

*) Cavalieri's principle

*Archimedes' theorem

*) The infinitude of primes

*) The divergence of the harmonic series

*) Slicing a cone by a plane will always give an ellipse

*) Formulas for the sums of the first n-th powers.

The mathematics is not rigorous, but that is not the intent here. The goal was to give a brief presentation and argument in favor of several fundamental mathematical principles. In my opinion, the author has found the mark, explaining these principles using language within the bounds of the merely interested rather than the learned professional.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews