Queer Burroughs [Paperback]

Jamie Russell (Author)

Book Description

ISBN-10: 0312239238 | ISBN-13: 978-0312239237 | Publication Date: July 20, 2001 | Edition: First Edition

William S. Burroughs is consistently thought of as a novelist who is gay, rather than a gay novelist. This distinction is slight, yet remarkable, since it has meant that Burroughs has been excluded from the gay canon and from the scope of queer theory. In this intelligent book, Jamie Russell offers the first queer reading of Burroughs' novels. He explores how the novels of Burroughs can be seen as a sustained attempt to offer a very personal rethinking of gay subjectivity and as an attempt to overturn stereotypes of gay men as effeminate. Yet in his celebration and appropriation of some of the most violent, misogynistic, and effeminophobic elements of heterosexually-identified masculinity, Burroughs' life and writing suggest a subjectivity that has been deeply troubling to many in the gay community.

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

This tightly written and convincing study by a British freelance journalist and college lecturer explores the relationship between the wily William S. Burroughs's writing and his homosexuality. In his excellent introduction, Jamie Russell describes the state of Burroughs studies, and the tendency of most critics to follow Norman Mailer in regarding "the fact that he's gay" as "incidental." The drug use and misogyny in Burroughs's novels has received far more attention than the homosexuality of his male alter ego, William Lee, and even gay critics appear to have washed their hands of Burroughs, with his troubling taste for handguns and the outlandishness of his vision.

By contrast, Russell hopes to "chart the progression of the novels' gay thematics, in particular the ways in which they respond to the gay movements that intersect their forty years, and the means by which they attempt to imagine a radical gay identity that builds upon the social gains made by the gay civil liberties movement." Russell pins his thesis on Burroughs's revulsion of effeminacy, the chief model of gay male existence available in the 1950s, when Junkie and Queer were written. In a letter to Allen Ginsberg, Burroughs made a crucial distinction between "us strong, manly, noble types and the leaping, jumping, window dressing c[---] sucker."

Russell argues that Burroughs's famous fragmentation of his male subject in these early novels is not a brilliantly queer destabilizing strategy, as some have considered it, but "the very mark of the regulation of the gay subject by the heterosexual dominant." He had a monkey on his back, in other words, and it wasn't heroin withdrawal. Queer Burroughs is a "strong, manly, noble" piece of cultural criticism of a kind Burroughs himself would have relished. --Regina Marler

Review

Convincing and compelling...accessible and understandable to any educated general reader. The prose is engaging, supple, fluid, readable, and clear. -- Bill Savage, Northwestern University

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 272 pages
• Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan; First Edition edition (July 20, 2001)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0312239238
• ISBN-13: 978-0312239237
• Product Dimensions: 8 x 5.4 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 11.4 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,806,851 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Jamie Russell is a journalist and author based in the UK. He is a contributing editor on Total Film magazine and freelances for Edge magazine, the world's most respected videogames publication. In over a decade of work as a freelance journalist he has written for the BBC Radio Times, BBC Movies, Channel 4 Film, Sight & Sound, FHM, and BAFTA. He's happiest writing about zombies, first person shooters and William S. Burroughs. One day he hopes to combine all three obsessions in a single feature...

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Disappointing, March 30, 2004

By 

Tom "Crane" Bradley (Seattle, WA USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Queer Burroughs (Paperback)

Though it's good to see that at last someone has written a book on Burroughs from a queer perspective, the author has such a limited and rigid idea of what counts as queer criticism that the book ultimately ignores most of what is interesting in Burroughs's fiction. The chapter on Naked Lunch, for example, focuses entirely on some rather questionable ideas about how to historicize the queer identity available in the 1950s, and thus ends up ignoring everything that is funny or satirical in a novel that is essentially comic and satirical (as well as being savage and caustic). The result is that every novel is viewed from a partial perspective that makes the book seem entirely thesis-driven, to the point that it simply ignores whatever is not grist for the author's mill.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars He Raises Some Good Points, September 24, 2008

By 

David L. Teeuwen - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Queer Burroughs (Paperback)

Russell's book is a helpful addition to Burroughs scholarship, but it takes as its premise an idea that is somewhat spurious to begin with: that Burroughs's homosexuality has been largely ignored in investigations of his work.

Perhaps this is true in the sense that most critics do not spend an enormous amount of time on the subject. However, the reason most critics probably don't spend a lot of time on the subject is because Burroughs didn't either. His sexuality was an integrated part of his work, not an objectified other, as Russell would like to suggest.

I found Russell's evaluation to be bordering on revisionist history, making Burroughs out to be someone contemplating and promoting his homosexuality in the same way present-day gay activists do, instead of ignoring his feelings and drowning himself in substance abuse. Perhaps he should have begun his evaluation of Burroughs work with his 1970's novels when homosexuality comes to the forefront as a main theme in Burroughs's work, instead of in Junky, Queer and Naked Lunch where it is a side show to other struggles.

As well, and very surprisingly in a book attempting to address his sexuality, Russell makes very little of the reality that Burroughs was in a heterosexual relationship for a number of years and fathered a child, while acting as step-father to another. Obviously, he was nothing like what a responsible father of his day would have been, and it didn't stop him from having homosexual affairs on the side, but, this is the very point. He wasn't exclusively homosexual any more than he was heterosexual. He was somewhere in between, it seems, depending on when you asked him. The world of identity politics was just beginning while Burroughs began to write. Even though Russell points this very fact out, the polemical sexual status he creates seems almost absent from the world of Burroughs.

Remember, Burroughs did not even publish a book until he was 39. It wasn't until half of his life was over that he adopted an exclusively homosexual lifestyle. And, as his letters show, he sometimes went back and forth in his feelings on his sexuality, up until the 1960's. Russell paints this as Burroughs being the victim of an outside influence (hostile governments of the 1950's, though Burroughs was absent from North America/England in the 1950's) rather than a person struggling to define himself.

The other issue I have with this book is that it does what many critics of Naked Lunch have done: it attempts to impose a narrative on the book that fits their view. Just as there are many versions of what a literal reading of a religious text may say, the 'real' narrative of Naked Lunch is revealed by whichever author is writing about it. Russell cannot be criticizes too harshly for this, as he is only following in the footsteps of most critics before him.

Ultimately, what Russell does well is bring to light many of the issues around Burroughs and sexuality and encapsulate them in a single book. However, Russell's book suffers from the identity politics of the 1990's and lacks substance because of this, and his book comes across more militant than disinterested. This would have been a much better book had Russell not given in to the temptation to try and cover anything before the 1970's.

3 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Finally!!, July 28, 2001

By 

"mugwumpboy2000" (UK) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Queer Burroughs (Hardcover)

It's amazing that it's taken this many years for someone to actually consider about Burroughs as a gay writer. All those Wild Boys are finally talked about as gay heroes in this excellent book. Jamie Russell made me return to the novels with new eyes. Of course Naked Lunch is about power and sex, of course the Wild Boys want to create a world without women. . . This book is a must-read for all Burroughs fans. Absolutely fantastic!!