5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A bit disappointing, October 23, 2002
This review is from: A Question Of Honor (Zebra Regency Romance) (Paperback)
I came to this book with rather high expectations, having seen comment about it here and elsewhere. It was, for me somewhere between 3 and 4 stars.
The problem was that it was more of an adventure story than romance, although adventure can add to rather than detract from romance if it is skilfully done and an enhancement to character development.
However, my problem with this book was that I never really warmed to the hero who was very juvenile and underdeveloped. He made astoundingly bad judgements repeatedly and seemed slow to learn. Handled correctly, these could have been sympathetic flaws but I am afraid I found them simply annoying.
The book gets 4 stars from me because the author examined and developed the theme of Judaism in early 19th century Britain and she did her homework. This is a subject I doubt has been much used in historical romantic fiction set in the Regency and the author did a super job of explaining the difficulties and problems Jews had at that time. In fact, the most romantic and sympathetic character in the story is the heroine's brother, James Nathanson.
The book's story of intrigue and adventure in Wellington's Quatermaster General's department is done well and the author has done her research. My main problem is that Capt Richard Drayton just does not stand out in the setting in which the author places him.
I have Nita Abrams next book in what appears to be a mini-series and hope to find her improving with this book. She clearly has talent and writes well.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Addicted!, March 19, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: A Question Of Honor (Zebra Regency Romance) (Paperback)
What a read! I recently took this on my vacation with me and found myself sneaking away to find time to read more! It's one of those rare books you are so sad to finish! I loved the characters--all of them--and was especially impressed by the depth behind them. The historical elements of the story were equally alluring. It is really a wonderful story filled with rich character development and the plot is extremely well thought out--with all the twists and turns of a mystery, the allure of romance, and the intelligence of a talented author. I can't wait for her next release!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Should be classifed as historical fiction, not historical romance, June 17, 2006
This review is from: A Question Of Honor (Zebra Regency Romance) (Paperback)
From the back cover:
London, 1813: Wellington and Napoleon are locked in a desperate battle for Spain. And now that the French have inflitrated England's intelligence network, Captain Richard Drayton has sworn to ferret out the traitor. But he'll be dammned if he'll let a woman distract him, even one as intriguing as his sister's governess, Rachel Maitland Ross.
The Captain suspects that Rachel is not what she appears to be, although her education is impeccable, her manners exquisite, and even Drayton's wayward little niece is captivated by her gentle ways. But the Captain has been marked for death--and badly wounded--by agents aiding the enemy, and Rachel's true identity as the niece of an immensely wealthy Anglo-Jewish banker remains a mystery. Still, he must trust her--if he is to survive.
Rachel has heard the whispers: the handsome Captain is a rogue and a heartbreaker, though he is unquestionably brave. Indeed, when they were both kidnapped, he risked his life to save hers--but their unexpected intimacy has compromised her reputation. Like a true gentleman, he has offered for her hand, yet she must refuse. Rachel cannot betray the bonds of kinship and of faith...although the bonds of love may prove even more powerful...
And my review:
I felt very cheated after trying to read this book. I bought it because it was listed as historical romance. It should be listed as historical fiction instead of historical romance, since there's hardly anything romantic in it.
Granted, the author deserves kudos for her excellent research and well written prose, as well as for choosing a difficult premise. Not many Regencies deal with Jewish people during the time of Napoleon. If you want a history lesson, the A QUESTION OF HONOR will probably satisfy you. But if you're looking for a book that is primarily a romance, you're going to be dissapointed.
This was a case of the old "bait and switch". The classification of the book promises me a historical romance, and doesn't deliver on it. I can only assume that since half of all book sales are romances, publishers and/or authors are looking to cash in by listing anything that is the slightest bit romantic as a romance novel. For Pete's sake, we don't even get to meet the heroine until chapter three! The first 30 pages of the book are about military strategies and maneuvers. Which is fine for many readers, but most readers of historical romance want a story that is primarily romance.
So that's my two cents worth. Just wanted to warn readers who are expecting a Regency in the style of Sabrina Jeffries or Mary Balogh that they aren't going to get it in A QUESTION OF HONOR.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
