|
There is a newer edition of this item:
|
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
49 of 53 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Gives inspiring ideas and insights into the history.,
By A Customer
This review is from: RC Series Bundle: The Poverty of Historicism (Routledge Classics) (Paperback)
This book is not your easy bedtime reading -- it's serious and requires a reader's thought to travel along the author's walks and remember his points. But the rewards are big -- Popper comes close to defining the method of the field I would call "societal engineering".Popper's main points to me are: 1. You can't plan and carry out a reform of the whole society. Reason - the people who carry out reforms are themselves changed by reforms. They loose relative objectivity and can no longer see clearly the original plan of reform and follow it. 2. You can plan and carry out changes in a relatively small sector or in a narrow field. Reason - it's possible to receive objective feedback and act on it to steer the reform into the objectives of the original plan. Examples from Soviet history that startled me: 1. A failure of Lenin and Bolsheviks to change society. They created a plan and did they try -- but the resulting system (in which I was born) instead of changing according to plan, just fed them the data their plans required. Even more almost all the originators of changes were destroyed by these changes. 2. A relative success of the NEP (New Economic Politics) initiated by Lenin and his associates. It dealt with relatively narrow field - small to middle businesses and it had definite goal -- to feed hungry country of the post-World War I Soviet Russia. And it did succeed! The NEP was stopped by Stalin, who unsuccessfully continued to implement plans to change whole society.
16 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This is a demolishing critic to the Ideological Marxism,
By A Customer
This review is from: RC Series Bundle: The Poverty of Historicism (Routledge Classics) (Paperback)
Karl Popper is one of the best thinkers about philosophy and Political theory.
Two of his greatest merits are, in order: The first is his coherent life (congruence between thougths and acts) and the other is that when this book came up first (it took about 18 years to be translated from German to English), the historycal timing (1950's) was the worst: Everybody thought that the Marxist theory regarding the history was right and scientifically proven.
Sir Popper demonstrated all errors of the Marxism from the ideolodical point of view, and that's why the name of the book.
Also, Mr. Popper was the only deep critiziser of Karl Marx.
15 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A slim volume with a powerful punch,
This review is from: RC Series Bundle: The Poverty of Historicism (Routledge Classics) (Paperback)
I read this book, and several of Karl Popper's other books then available in English, while still a graduate student in anthropology at an American university. While neither my dissertation committee members nor even my fellow graduate students were much interested in my attempts to bring Popper's arguments to their attention, I found his work to be exhilarating for its clarity, courage, and fairmindedness. Thirty-plus years later, I still do.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|