From Publishers Weekly
Ostensibly a collection of miscellaneous essays on legal history, this latest from legal historian Levy is an often unintentionally amusing account of academic infighting. In 1969, Levy's Origins of the Fifth Amendment won the Pulitzer Prize in history, "making it an attractive target for critics." Here he settles accounts with anyone who criticized that book as well as several others written in his long career. He cites his critics by name, eviscerating them for their deceptiveness, irrelevance and sarcasm, their tendency to "attack" him, to "persistently misrepresent [him], even on trivial matters" and to misspell his name. In one astonishing chapter, he recounts how Harvard University Press, "whor[ing] after a best-seller," initially rejected his manuscript on the history of blasphemy. After two eminent readers of his own choosing submitted negative critiques, an enraged Levy wrote HUP a bilious, defensive 13-page letter, which he produces here in full ("I am an amateur, but I do not think I'm incompetent. Nor do I believe that I am unfair or prejudiced. I suspect that my reader is unfair to me. But I'm used to that sort of reaction"). Most of the rest of this volume consists of straightforward, densely detailed essays on the historical context of the Fourth Amendment, the published opinions of Massachusetts Chief Justice Lemuel Shaw and the 17th-century English religious anarchists known as "Ranters." Accomplished though they are, these chapters seem like afterthoughts in a work devoted mainly to airing personal grievances 30 years old. (Apr.)
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
Levy, a constitutional historian and Pulitzer Prize winner (Origins of the Fifth Amendment), offers an anthology of eight interpretive essays on the history of law, a field he studies "to discover what mankind has been and done and thought." In mid-17th-century England Ranters were antinomianists who repudiated moral law in both religious and political practices. In his essay on the Ranters, Levy emphasizes the procedural, substantive, and cultural underpinnings of the law. He continues this theme with an analysis of the origins of the Fourth Amendment's right against self-incrimination. Two essays show academic conflicts concerning the quality of historical works, including his own conflicts with Harvard University Press over a book on blasphemy and an unusual essay on the inner workings of the Pulitzer committee. The book's careful arguments will interest readers concerned with law, history, and the development of civil rights. Strongly recommended for larger public libraries and academic libraries.
-Steven Puro, St. Louis Univ. Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc.