Most Helpful Customer Reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good antidote to the sanitized history taught in schools., November 16, 1996
By A Customer
This review is from: The Rape of the American Constitution (Paperback)
Chuck Shiver points out several areas and incidents, dating
practically from the Founding,
in which the practice of the US federal gov't dramatically
contradicts its Constitution (and the treaties it has
signed). Everyone knows about the drug war, but not about
the genocidal treatment of various native American tribes,
the Japanese internment, and many Supreme Court decisions
practically sneering at the founding document. The "Bonus
March" on Washington, and its unConstitutional disruption,
was a huge political event of the 1930's of which I was not
aware. Every American history student should read this
book. The only drawback is the lurid cover, which shows
a line drawing of the statue of Liberty being raped by
men in robes. Adults should buy this book, spraypaint the
cover, and give it to their middle-school or high school
children.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A book for anyone who cherishes democracy., February 13, 2000
This review is from: The Rape of the American Constitution (Paperback)
This is a book a incredible insight. It opens your eyes to the possibility that we may soon lose all of the right gauranteed to us by the bill of rights. Hundreds of pages document the systematic destruction of our gauranteed rights. It should be required reading for every student, make that every American. One of the best books I've ever read. It made me furious.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Valuable Alternative Source, September 9, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: The Rape of the American Constitution (Paperback)
While Shivers' books is a valuable alternative account of American legal history and the contemporary state of American constitutionalism, it should be seen as only that-- alternative. Noam Chomsky rightly points out that those who present alternative view points must also present the in depth analysis of evidence to back up those view points. Shivers presents little evidence and even less that can be traced to other sources. He has an agenda and he pursues that at the expense of accademic and historical good faith. With no basis he numerically quantifies the current worth of every protection in the bill of rights, and approaches criticism of the Supreme court from a rather dogmatic and cliched angle. However, to his credit, his account of the tragedies of Andrew Jackson's term in office and the Bonus March are among the best and the most detailled I have seen. If you choose to read Shivers' book do so skeptically and use it as a secondary and supplemental source rather than a primary political and historical doctrine.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|